Symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism (femininity in female faces, masculinity in male faces) are attractive in faces. Many have suggested that preferences for these traits may be adaptations for identifying healthy mates. If they are, then the traits should be honest indicators of health and their attractiveness should result from their healthy appearance. Much research has focused on whether these traits honestly signal health. Here we focused on whether the appeal of these traits results from their healthy appearance. Specifically, we tested whether the attractiveness of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism is reduced or eliminated when perceived health is controlled, in two large samples of Western faces and a large sample of Japanese faces. The appeal of symmetric faces was largely due to their healthy appearance, with most associations between symmetry and attractiveness eliminated when perceived health was controlled. A healthy appearance also contributed to the appeal of averageness and femininity in female faces and masculinity in male faces, although it did not fully explain their appeal. These results show that perceptions of attractiveness are sensitive to a healthy appearance, and are consistent with the hypothesis that preferences may be adaptations for mate choice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssonM, 1994Sexual Selection (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
2.
EtcoffN, 1999Survival of the Prettiest (New York: Doubleday)
3.
FeingoldA, 1992“Good-looking people are not what we think”Psychological Bulletin111304–341
4.
FinkBPenton-VoakI, 2002“Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness”Current Directions in Psychological Science11154–158
5.
FolstadIKarterA J, 1992“Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap”American Naturalist139603–622
6.
GangestadSBussD M, 1993“Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences”Ethology and Sociobiology1489–96
7.
GangestadSScheydG J, 2005“The evolution of human physical attractiveness”Annual Review of Anthropology34523–548
8.
GrammerKFinkBMøllerA PThornhillR, 2003“Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty”Biological Reviews78385–407
9.
GrammerKThornhillR, 1994“Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness”Journal of Comparative Psychology108233–242
10.
HalberstadtJ, 2006“The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes”Personality and Social Psychology Review10166–183
11.
HalberstadtJRhodesG, 2000“The attractiveness of non-face averages: Implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces”Psychological Science11285–289
12.
HalberstadtJRhodesG, 2003“It's not just the average face that's attractive: The attractiveness of averageness in computer-manipulated birds, fish and automobiles”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review10149–156
13.
HalberstadtJRhodesGCattyS R, 2003“Subjective and objective familiarity as explanations for the attraction to average faces”, in Advances in Psychology Researchvolume 22, Ed. ShohovS P (New York: Nova Science) pp 35–49
14.
HendersonJ J AAnglinJ M, 2003“Facial attractiveness predicts longevity”Evolution and Human Behavior24351–356
15.
HoymeH E, 1994“Minor anomalies: diagnostic clues to aberrant human morphogenesis”, in Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications Ed. MarkowT A (Dordrecht: Kluwer) pp 309–317
16.
JonesB CLittleA CFeinbergD RPenton-VoakI STiddemanB PPerrettD I, 2004“The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness”Evolution and Human Behavior2524–30
17.
JonesB CLittleA CPenton-VoakI STiddemanB PBurtD MPerrettD I, 2001“Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a ‘good-genes’ explanation of the attractiveness – symmetry relationship”Evolution and Human Behavior22417–429
18.
KalickS MZebrowitzL ALangloisJ HJohnsonR M, 1998“Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question”Psychological Science98–13
19.
LangloisJ HKalakanisLRubensteinA JLarsonAHallamMSmootM, 2000“Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review”Psychological Bulletin126390–423
20.
Law SmithM JPerrettD IJonesB CCornwellR EMooreF RFeinbergD RBoothroydL GDurraniS JStirratM RWhitenSPitmanR MHillierS G, 2006“Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B273135–140
21.
MøllerA PSwaddleJ P, 1997Asymmetry, Developmental Stability and Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
22.
RhodesG, 2006“The evolution of facial attractiveness”Annual Review of Psychology57199–226
23.
RhodesGChanJZebrowitzL ASimmonsL W, 2003“Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B (Supplement) 270S93–S95 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0023)
24.
RhodesGHarwoodKYoshikawaSNishitaniMMcLeanI G, 2002“The attractiveness of average facial configurations: Cross-cultural evidence and the biology of beauty”, in Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive and Social Perspectives Eds RhodesGZebrowitzL A (Westport, CT: Ablex) pp 35–58
25.
RhodesGProffittFGradyJ MSumichA, 1998“Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5659–669
26.
RhodesGSimmonsL W, 2007“Symmetry, attractiveness and sexual selection”, in Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology Eds DunbarRBarrettL (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 333–364
27.
RhodesGSimmonsLPetersM, 2005“Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success?”Evolution and Human Behavior26186–201
28.
RhodesGSumichAByattG, 1999“Are average facial configurations only attractive because of their symmetry?”Psychological Science1052–58
29.
RhodesGTremewanT, 1996“Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness”Psychological Science7105–110
30.
RhodesGYoshikawaSClarkALeeKMcKayRAkamatsuS, 2001a“Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty”Perception30611–625
31.
RhodesGZebrowitzL A (Eds), 2002Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive and Social Perspectives (Westport, CT: Ablex)
32.
RhodesGZebrowitzL AClarkAKalickS MHightowerAMcKayR, 2001b“Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?”Evolution and Human Behavior2231–46
33.
RosenthalR, 1991Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research (Newbury Park, CA: Sage)
34.
SimmonsL WRhodesGPetersMKoehlerN, 2004“Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability?”Behavioral Ecology15864–871
35.
SlaterAvon der SchulenburgCBrownEBadenochMButterworthGParsonsSSamuelsC, 1998“Newborn infants prefer attractive faces”Infant Behavior and Development21345–354
36.
SolerCNúñezMGutierrezRNúñezJMedinaPSanchoMAlvarezJNúñezA, 2003“Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality”Evolution and Human Behavior24199–207
37.
SteigerJ H, 1980“Tests for comparing the elements of a correlation matrix”Psychological Bulletin87245–251
38.
SymonsD, 1979The Evolution of Human Sexuality (New York: Oxford University Press)
39.
ThornhillR, 2003“Darwinian aesthetics informs traditional aesthetics”, in Evolutionary Aesthetics Eds VolandEGrammerK (Berlin: Springer) pp 9–35
ThornhillRGangestadS W, 1999“Facial attractiveness”Trends in Cognitive Sciences3452–460
42.
ThornhillTMøllerA P, 1997“Developmental stability, disease and medicine”Biological Reviews72497–548
43.
WinkielmanPHalberstadtJFazendeiroTCattyS, 2006“Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the eye”Psychological Science17799–806
44.
ZebrowitzL ARhodesG, 2004“Sensitivity to ‘bad genes’ and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health”Journal of Nonverbal Behavior28167–185
