It has been hypothesized (Lederman et al, 1990 Perception & Psychophysics47 54–64) that sighted people adopt a visual translation process when attempting to identify 2-D raised images by touch—they employ a visual image as a mediator between haptic sensory information and the object representation. If this hypothesis is correct, the performance in identifying pictures by touch (with eyes closed) ought to be better when the head is facing the picture than when facing in a very different direction. In this study, thirty-six blindfolded participants were required to identify raised pictures of common objects with their head facing either in the same direction as the raised picture or in an orthogonal direction. Identification performance was measured in terms of accuracy and response latencies. Overall, participants were more accurate and faster when their heads faced in the same direction as the picture. This finding is discussed in terms of spatial congruency between haptic representations of pictures and visual (or spatial) imagery created during exploration of haptic pictures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DacenDCoulsonM, 1988“Tactile mobility maps—A comparative study”, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for Visually Handicapped People Eds TathamA FDoddsA G, (Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham Press) pp 7–23.
2.
HellerM A, 1989“Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and in the blind: The advantage of the late blind”Perception18379–389.
3.
HellerM AKennedyJ MClarkAMcCarthyMBorgertAWempleLFulkersonEKaffelNDuncanARiddleT, 2006“Viewpoint and orientation influence picture recognition in the blind”Perception351397–1420.
4.
HellerM AMcCarthyMClarkA, 2005“Pattern perception and pictures for the blind”Psicologia26161–171.
5.
IkedaMUchikawaK, 1978“Integrating time for visual pattern perception and a comparison with the tactile mode”Vision Research181565–1571.
6.
KennedyJ MFoxN, 1977“Pictures to see and pictures to touch”, in The Arts and Cognition Eds PerkinsDLeondarB, (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp 118–135.
7.
KlatzkyR LLoomisJ MLedermanS JHiromiWFujitaN, 1993“Haptic identification of objects and their depictions”Perception & Psychophysics54170–178.
8.
LedermanS JKlatzkyR LChatawayCSummersC D, 1990“Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects”Perception & Psychophysics4754–64.
9.
LoomisJ MKlatzkyR LAvraamidesMLippaYGolledgeR G, 2007“Functional equivalence of spatial images produced by perception and spatial language”, in Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery, and Perception Eds MastFJänckeL, (New York: Springer) pp 29–48.
10.
LoomisJ MKlatzkyR LLedermanS J, 1991“Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view”Perception20167–177.
11.
MageeL EKennedyJ M, 1980“Exploring pictures tactually”Nature278287–288.
12.
MarksD F, 1973“Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures”British Journal of Psychology6417–24.
13.
RatcliffR, 1993“Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers”Psychological Bulletin114510–532.
14.
RoschEMervisCGrayWJohnsonDBoyes-BraemP, 1976“Basic objects in natural categories”Cognitive Psychology8382–439.
15.
SnodgrassJ GVanderwartM, 1980“A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory6174–215.
16.
ToriiSMochizukiTWakeT, 1975“Perception of three-D represented patterns by touch and vision”Proceedings of the First Sensory Substitution Symposium Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
