This paper presents the results of some recent experiments in neuroscience and perceptual science that reveal the role of virtual reality in normal visual perception, and the use of television technology by the visual brain. This involves particularly the cholinergic system in the forebrain. This research throws new light on the nature of perception and the relation of phenomenal consciousness and its brain. It is directly relevant to criticisms by certain analytical philosophers of aspects of neuroscience relating to these matters. Particular attention is paid to their support for Naive Realism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BechtelWMandikPMundallJStufflebeamR S, (Eds), 2001Philosophy and the Neurosciences (Oxford: Blackwell).
2.
BennettMDennettDHackerPSearleJ, 2007Neuroscience and Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press).
3.
BennettMHackerP, 2003Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Oxford: Blackwell).
4.
BrainW R, 1946“The neurological approach to the problem of perception”Philosophy21133–146.
5.
CrickF, 1994The Astonishing Hypothesis (New York: Scribner).
GregoryR, 1981Mind in Science (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson).
13.
HardinC L, 2008“Color qualities and the physical world”, in The Case for Qualia Ed. WrightE, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
14.
KleiserRSeitzR JKrekelbergB, 2004“Neural correlates of saccadic suppression in humans”Current Biology14195–197.
15.
KovácsIPapathomasT VYangMFehérA, 1996“When the brain changes its mind: Intraocular grouping during retinal rivalry”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1004289–296.
16.
LibetB, 1981“The experimental evidence for subjective referral of a sensory experience backwards in time: Reply to P. S. Churchland”Philosophy of Science48182–219.
17.
NoëAThompsonE, 2004“Are there neural correlates of consciousness?”Journal of Consciousness Studies115–28.
18.
PenroseR, 1989The Emperor's New Mind (New York: Viking Penguin).
RamachandranV SBlakesleeS, 1998Phantoms in the Brain (New York: HarperCollins).
22.
RobertsonL C, 2003“Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness”Nature Reviews Neuroscience493–102.
23.
RouhierA, 1927Le Peyotl (Paris: Gaston Doin).
24.
SchilderP, 1942Mind. Perception and Thought in their Constructive Aspects (New York: Columbia University Press) pp 21, 181, 355.
25.
SmythiesJ, 1953“The experience and description of the human body”Brain76132–145.
26.
SmythiesJ, 1959“The stroboscopic patterns”British Journal of Psychology50106–116, 305–325.
27.
SmythiesJ, 1960“The stroboscopic patterns”British Journal of Psychology51247–255.
28.
SmythiesJ, 1994aThe Walls of Plato's Cave (Aldershot, Hants: Avebury).
29.
SmythiesJ, 1994b“Review of Francis Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis”Brain117899–901.
30.
SmythiesJ, 1994c“Shipwreck of a grand hypothesis: Review of Francis Crick: The Astonishing Hypothesis”Inquiry37267–280.
31.
SmythiesJ, 1994d“Requiem for the Identity Theory”Inquiry37311–321.
32.
SmythiesJ, 1994e“On the nature of consciousness and the unconscious from the point of view of neuroscience and neurophilosophy”, in the Neurological Boundaries of Reality Ed. CritchleyE M R, (London: Farrand Books).
33.
SmythiesJ, 2002The Dynamic Neuron (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
34.
SmythiesJ, 2003“Space, time and consciousness”Journal of Consciousness Studies1047–56.
35.
SmythiesJ, 2008“The ontological status of qualia and sensations: How they fit into the brain”, in The Case for Qualia Ed. WrightE, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
36.
SmythiesJRamachandranV S, 1998“An empirical refutation of the Direct Realist theory of perception”Inquiry40437–438.
37.
StrollA, 1988Surfaces (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
38.
TeschnerG, 1981“The undifferentiated conjunction of sensation and judgement in perception”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research42119–122.
39.
TreismanASchmidtH, 1982“Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects”Cognitive Psychology14107–141.
