The other-race effect is a collection of phenomena whereby faces of one's own race are processed differently from those of other races. Previous studies have revealed a paradoxical mirror pattern of an own-race advantage in face recognition and an other-race advantage in race-based categorisation. With a well-controlled design, we compared recognition and categorisation of own-race and other-race faces in both Caucasian and Chinese participants. Compared with own-race faces, other-race faces were less accurately and more slowly recognised, whereas they were more rapidly categorised by race. The mirror pattern was confirmed by a unique negative correlation between the two effects in terms of reaction time with a hierarchical regression analysis. This finding suggests an antagonistic interaction between the processing of face identity and that of face category, and a common underlying processing mechanism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiJ SRhodesM G, 2005“An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review121043–1047.
2.
AnastasiJ SRhodesM G, 2006“Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition”North American Journal of Psychology8237–252.
3.
BernsteinM JYoungS GHugenbergK, 2007“The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition”Psychological Science18706–712.
4.
BothwellR KBrighamJ CMalpassR S, 1989“Cross-racial identification”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin1519–25.
5.
BrighamJ CMaasASnyderL DSpauldingK, 1982“Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42673–681.
6.
BrighamJ CMalpassR S, 1985“The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons”Journal of Social Issues41139–155.
7.
BruceV, 1986“Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces”Perception15387–397.
8.
BruceVYoungA, 1986“Understanding face recognition”British Journal of Psychology77305–327.
9.
BruyerRLeclereSQuinetP, 2004“Ethnic categorisation of faces is not independent of face identity”Perception33169–179.
10.
BurtonA MBruceVJohnstonR A, 1990“Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model”British Journal of Psychology81361–380.
11.
ByattGRhodesG, 2004“Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review11735–741.
12.
CaldaraRRossionBBovetPHauertC A, 2004“Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantage”NeuroReport15905–910.
13.
ChanceJ ETurnerA LGoldsteinA G, 1982“Development of differential recognition for own-race and other-race faces”Journal of Psychology11229–37.
14.
ChiroroPValentineT, 1995“An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology48879–894.
15.
CrossJ FCrossJDalyJ, 1971“Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces”Perception & Psychophysics10393–396.
16.
EtcoffN L, 1984“Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion”Neuropsychologia22281–295.
17.
GanelTGoshen-GottsteinY, 2002“Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: Further evidence for the single-route hypothesis”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28854–867.
18.
GolbyA JGabrieliJ D EChiaoJ YEberhardtJ L, 2001“Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces”Nature Neuroscience4845–850.
19.
HaxbyJ VHoffmanE AGobbiniM I, 2000“The distributed human neural system for face perception”Trends in Cognitive Sciences4223–233.
20.
HillsP JLewisM B, 2006“Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59996–1002.
21.
HugenbergKMillerJClaypoolH M, 2007“Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43334–340.
22.
HumphreysG WDonnellyNRiddochM J, 1993“Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence”Neuropsychologia31173–181.
23.
JaquetERhodesGHaywardW G, 2008“Race contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces”Visual Cognition16734–753.
24.
Le GalP MBruceV, 2002“Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces”Perception & Psychophysics64230–243.
25.
LevinD T, 1996“Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition221364–1382.
26.
LevinD T, 2000“Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General129559–574.
27.
MeissnerC ABrighamJ C, 2001“Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces—A meta-analytic review”Psychology Public Policy and Law73–35.
28.
PezdekKBlandon-GitlinLMooreC, 2003“Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-rate effect”Journal of Applied Psychology88760–763.
29.
RhodesGBrakeSTaylorKTanS, 1989“Expertise and configural coding in face recognition”British Journal of Psychology80313–331.
30.
SangrigoliSde SchonenS, 2004a“Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects”Developmental Science774–87.
31.
SangrigoliSde SchonenS, 2004b“Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry451219–1227.
32.
ShepherdJ WDeregowskiJ B, 1981“Races and faces—a comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races”British Journal of Social Psychology20125–133.
33.
SporerS L, 2001“Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups—An integration of theories”Psychology Public Policy and Law736–97.
34.
StroessnerS J, 1996“Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times”Social Cognition14247–276.
35.
ValentineT, 1991“A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology43161–204.
36.
ValentineTEndoM, 1992“Towards an exemplar model of face processing—the effects of race and distinctiveness”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology44671–703.
37.
WrightD BSladdenB, 2003“An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition”Acta Psychologica114101–114.
38.
YoungA WHayD CMcWeenyK HFludeB MEllisA W, 1985“Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features”Perception14737–746.
39.
YoungA WNewcombeFDehaanE H FSmallMHayD C, 1993“Face perception after brain injury—Selective impairments affecting identity and expression”Brain116941–959.
40.
ZarateM ASmithE R, 1990“Person categorization and stereotyping”Social Cognition8161–185.
