Human faces under natural illumination, and human eyes in their unique morphology, include specific contrast polarity relations that face-detection mechanisms could capitalise on. Newborns have been shown to preferentially orient to simple face-like patterns only when they contain face- or gaze-relevant contrast. We investigated whether human adults show similar preferential orienting towards schematic face-like stimuli, and whether this effect depends on the contrast polarity of the stimuli. In two experiments we demonstrate that upright schematic face-like patterns elicit faster eye movements in adult humans than inverted ones, and that this occurs only if they contain face- or gaze-relevant contrast information in the whole stimulus or in the eye region only. These results suggest that primitive mechanisms underlying the orienting bias towards faces and eyes influence and modulate social cognition not just in infants but in adults as well.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndoS, 2002“Luminance-induced shift in the apparent direction of gaze”Perception31657–674.
2.
AndoS, 2004“Perception of gaze direction based on luminance ratio”Perception331173–1184.
3.
BindemannMBurtonA MLangtonS RSchweinbergerS RDohertyM J, 2007“The control of attention to faces”Journal of Vision71–8.
CsibraGGergelyG, 2006“Social learning and social cognition: The case of pedagogy”, in Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development: Attention and Performance XXI Eds MunakataYJohnsonM H, (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 249–274.
6.
CsibraGJohnsonM HTuckerL A, 1997“Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density ERP study of the gap effect”Neuropsychologia35855–865.
7.
EastwoodJ DSmilekDMerikleP M, 2003“Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance”Perception & Psychophysics65352–358.
8.
EmeryN J, 2000“The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze”Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews24581–604.
9.
FarroniTJohnsonM HMenonEZulianLFaragunaDCsibraG, 2005“Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA10217245–17250.
10.
FoxERussoRBowlesRDuttonK, 2001“Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130681–700.
11.
de GelderB, 2006“Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language”Nature Reviews Neuroscience7242–249.
12.
de GelderBVroomenJPourtoisGWeiskrantzL, 1999“Non-conscious recognition of affect in the absence of striate cortex”NeuroReport103759–3763.
13.
GeorgeNDolanR JFinkG RBaylisG CRussellCDriverJ, 1999“Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus”Nature Neuroscience2574–580.
14.
GorenC CSartyMWuP Y, 1975“Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants”Pediatrics56544–549.
15.
HershlerOHochsteinS, 2005“At first sight: A high-level pop out effect for faces”Vision Research451707–1724.
16.
ItierR JTaylorM J, 2002“Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs”NeuroImage15353–372.
17.
JohnsonM H, 2005“Subcortical face processing”Nature Reviews Neuroscience6766–774.
18.
JohnsonM HDziurawiecSEllisHMortonJ, 1991“Newborns' preferential tracking of facelike stimuli and its subsequent decline”Cognition401–19.
19.
JohnstonAHillHCarmanN, 1992“Recognising faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal”Perception21365–375.
20.
KanwisherN, 2000“Domain specificity in face perception”Nature Neuroscience3759–762.
21.
KanwisherNTongFNakayamaK, 1998“The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area”Cognition68B1–B11.
22.
KleinkeC L, 1986“Gaze and eye contact; a research review”Psychological Bulletin10078–100.
23.
KobayashiHKohshimaS, 1997“Unique morphology of the human eye”Nature387767–768.
24.
KuwahataHAdachiIFujitaKTomonagaMMatsuzawaT, 2004“Development of schematic face preference in macaque monkeys”Behavioural Processes6617–21.
25.
LangtonS RLawA SBurtonA MSchweinbergerS R, 2008“Attention capture by faces”Cognition107330–342.
26.
LavieNRoTRussellC, 2003“The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces”Psychological Science14510–515.
27.
LewisM BEdmondsA J, 2003“Face detection: Mapping human performance”Perception32903–920.
28.
LewisM BEdmondsA J, 2005“Searching for faces in scrambled scenes”Visual Cognition121309–1336.
29.
CassiaV MacchiSimionFUmiltaC, 2001“Face preference at birth: The role of an orienting mechanism”Developmental Science4101–108.
30.
CassiaV MacchiTuratiCSimionF, 2004“Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns' face preference?”Psychological Science15379–383.
31.
MoggKBradleyB P, 1999“Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness”Cognition & Emotion13713–740.
32.
MorrisJ SOhmanADolanR J, 1999“A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating ‘unseen’ fear”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA961680–1685.
33.
MortonJJohnsonM H, 1991“CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition”Psychological Review98164–181.
34.
PourtoisGGrandjeanDSanderDVuilleumierP, 2004“Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces”Cerebral Cortex14619–633.
35.
RicciardelliPBaylisGDriverJ, 2000“The positive and negative of human expertise in gaze perception”Cognition77B1–B14.
36.
RoTFriggelALavieN, 2007“Attentional biases for faces and body parts”Visual Cognition15322–348.
37.
SchultzR T, 2005“Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area”International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience23125–141.
38.
SewardsT VSewardsM A, 2002“Innate visual object recognition in vertebrates: Some proposed pathways and mechanisms”Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology132861–891.
39.
SimionFValenzaEUmiltaCBarbaB Dalla, 1998“Preferential orienting to faces in newborns: A temporal-nasal asymmetry”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance241399–1405.
40.
SinhaP, 2000“Last but not least—Here's looking at you, kid”Perception291005–1008.
41.
TheeuwesJVan der StigchelS, 2006“Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return”Visual Cognition13657–665.
42.
ValenzaESimionFCassiaV MacchiUmiltaC, 1996“Face preference at birth”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22892–903.
43.
VanRullenR, 2006“On second glance: Still no high-level pop-out effect for faces”Vision Research463017–3027.
44.
VuilleumierP, 2005“How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention”Trends in Cognitive Sciences9585–594.
45.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145.
