According to the commonly accepted view, Galileo Galilei devised in 1638 an experiment that seemed able to show that the velocity of light is finite. An analysis of archival material shows that two decades later members of the Florence scientific society Accademia del Cimento followed Galileo guidelines by actually attempting to measure the velocity of light and suggesting improvements. This analysis also reveals a fundamental difference between Galileo's and Florence academy's methodologies and that Galileo's experiment was, in some respects, a pioneering work affecting also the history of the psychology of perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerD GBaker-BlockerA, 1986“Visual observation of lightning propagation”Nature322215.
2.
BerettaM, 2000“At the source of western science: The organization of experimentalism at the Academia del Cimento (1657–1667)”Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London54131–151.
3.
BorelliA, 1657Letter to Leopoldo de Medici (April 14th), in Galilean Manuscripts, Posteriori T.16, Fondo Palatino 275, Folio 65 BCNF.
4.
BoringE G, 1950A History of Experimental Psychology (New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts).
5.
BoschieroL, 2005“Post-Galilean thought and experiment in seventeenth-century Italy: The life and work of Vincenzo Viviani”History of Science4377–100.
6.
BoyerC B, 1941“Early estimates of the velocity of light”Isis3324–40.
7.
BozziP, 1995“Osservazione e percezione. (Velocità della luce ed effetto y)”, in Galileo e la scienza sperimentale Ed. CeolinM Baldo (Padua: Dipartimento di Fisica “Galileo Galilei”) pp 112–118.
8.
BrantleyR DTillerJ AUmanM A, 1975“Lightning properties in Florida thunderstorms from video tape records”Journal of Geophysical Research803402–3406.
9.
BrookMVonnegutB, 1960“Visual confirmation of the junction process in lightning discharge”Journal of Geophysical Research651302–1303.
10.
CahanD, 1994Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-century Science (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
11.
CohenI B, 1940“Roemer and the first determination of the velocity of light”Isis31327–379.
12.
CrombieA C, 1972“The primary properties and secondary qualities in Galileo Galilei's natural philosophy”, in Saggi su Galileo Galilei Ed. MaccagniC, (Florence: Barbera) pp 71–91.
13.
DebruC, 2001“Helmholtz and the psychophysiology of time”Science in Context14471–492.
14.
D'AbbadieA, 1887“Lightning-flashes”Nature35342.
15.
DrakeS, 1986“Galileo's physical measurements”American Journal of Physics54302–306.
16.
FabroniA, (Ed.) 1775Lettere inedite di uomini illustri Tomo 2 (Florence: Moücke).
17.
FingerSWadeN, 2002“The neuroscience of Helmholtz and the theories of Johannes Müller: Part 1: Nerve cell structure, vitalism, and the nerve impulse”Journal of the History of the Neurosciences11136–155.
18.
FizeauH L, 1849“Sur une expérience relative à la vitesse de propagation de la lumière”Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris2990–92.
19.
GalileiG, 1623/1957Il Saggiatore, nel quale con bilancia esquisita e giusta … (Rome: Mascardi, 1623). English translation by DrakeS, in Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (New York: Doubleday, 1957).
20.
GalileiG, 1632/1969Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo tolemaico e copernicano (Florence: Landini). English translation by DrakeS, in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican2nd edition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967).
21.
GalileiG, 1638/1974Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche, intorno a due nuove scienze … (Leiden: appresso gli Elsevirii). English translation by DrakeS, in Two New Sciences (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).
22.
GiovannozziG, 1926–1927“Una lettera di Francesco Famiano Nichelini a Giovanni Alfonso Borelli”Atti della Pontificia Accademia delle Scienze80315–319.
23.
KenkelF, 1913“Untersuchungen über den Zusammenhang zwischen Erscheinungsgröβe und Erscheinungsbewegung bei einigen sogenannten optischen Täuschungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie67358–449.
24.
KriderE P, 1974“An unusual photograph of an air lightning discharge”Weather2924–27.
25.
MachE, 1898/1986Popular Scientific Lectures (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986).
26.
MagalottiL, 1667/1684Saggi di naturali esperienze fatte nell'Accademia del Cimento (Florence: Cocchini). English translation by WallerR, in Essayes of Natural Experiments made in the Academie del Cimento (London: Benjamin Alsop, 1684).
27.
MagalottiLVivianiL, no date, Galilean Manuscripts, Posteriori T.9 Cimento. Fisica Sperimentalevolume 9 Memorie e spoglio di esperienze. Fondo Palatino 268, Folio 167r-172r BCNF.
28.
MartinezJ A, 1974“Galileo on primary and secondary qualities”Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences10160–169.
MiddletonW E K, 1971The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del Cimento (Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins Press).
31.
MiddletonW E K, (Ed.) 1980Lorenzo Magalotti at the Court of Charles II (Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press).
32.
MollonJ DPerkinsA J, 1996“Errors of judgment at Greenwich in 1796”Nature380101–102.
33.
PiccolinoMWadeN J, 2008“Galileo's eye: A new vision of the senses in the work of Galileo Galilei”Perception371312–1340.
34.
RinaldiniC, no date, Galilean Manuscripts, Posteriori T.9 Cimento. Fisica Sperimentalevolume 9 Memorie e spoglio di esperienze. Fondo Palatino 268, Folio 166r BCNF.
35.
RobinsonD K, 2001“Reaction-time experiments in Wundt's Institute and beyond”, in Wilhelm Wundt in History: The Making of a Scientific Psychology Eds RieberR WRobinsonD K, (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press) pp 161–204.
36.
RonzaniAMaccarroneFDi LietoA, 2008“Measuring light speed with a modulated laser diode”European Journal of Physics29957–965.
37.
SalmonW, 1977“The philosophical significance of the one-way speed of light”Noûs11253–292.
38.
SchmidgenH, 2003“Time and noise: The stable surroundings of reaction experiments, 1860–1890”Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences34237–275.
39.
SchmidgenH, 2005“Physics, ballistics, and psychology: A history of the chronoscope in/as context, 1845–1890”History of Psychology846–78.
40.
SheaW R, 1978“Descartes as critic of Galileo”, in New Perspectives on Galileo Eds ButtsR WPittJ C, (Dordrecht: Reidel) pp 139–159.
41.
StraulinoS, 2008“Reconstruction of Galileo Galilei's experiment: The inclined plane”Physics Education43316–321.
42.
TozzettiG Targioni, (Ed.) 1780Atti e Memorie Inedite dell'Accademia del Cimento (Florence: Tofani).
43.
TitchenerE B, 1905Experimental Psychology. A Manual of Experimental Practicevolume IIQuantitative Experiments Part II Instructor's Manual (New York: Macmillan).
44.
VivianiV, no date, Galilean Manuscripts, Posteriori T.10 Cimento. Fisica Sperimentalevolume 10 Miscellanee I. Fondo Palatino 268, Folio 60r BCNF.
