The aim of the present study was to investigate how perceptual binding and selective attention operate during infants' and adults' visual search of an illusory figure. An eye-tracker system was used to test adults and infants in two conditions: illusory and non-illusory (real). In the illusory condition, a Kanizsa triangle was embedded among distractor pacmen which did not generate illusory contours. In the non-illusory condition, a real triangle was included in the same pacmen's display. The results showed that adults detected both the Kanizsa and the real figure automatically and without focal attention (experiment 1). In contrast, 6-month-old infants showed a pop-out effect only for the real figure (experiment 2). The failure of the illusory figure to trigger infants' attention was not due to infants' inability to perceive the illusory figure per se, as infants preferred the illusory figure over a non-illusory control stimulus in a classical preferential-looking task (experiment 3). Overall, these findings indicate that the illusory Kanizsa triangle triggers visual attention in adults, but not in infants, supporting evidence that at 6 months of age the binding processes involved in the perception of a Kanizsa figure do not operate in an adult-like manner.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbertM K, 1993“Parallelism and the perception of illusory contours”Perception22589–595
2.
AdlerS AOrprecioJ, 2006“The eyes have it: Visual pop-out in infants and adults”Developmental Science9189–206
3.
AmsoDJohnsonS P, 2006“Learning by selection: Visual search and object perception in young infants”Developmental Psychology421236–1245
4.
BertenthalB ICamposJ JHaithM M, 1980“Development of visual organization: The perception of subjective contours”Child Development511072–1080
5.
BhattR S, 1997“The interface between perception and cognition: Feature detection, visual pop-out effects, feature integration, and long-term memory in infancy”, in Advances in Infancy Research Eds Rovee-CollierCLipsittL P (Orwood, NJ: Ablex) volume 11, pp 143–191
6.
CanfieldR LSmithE GBrezsnyakM PSnowK L, 1997“Information processing through the first year of life: a longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm”Monographs of the Society or Research in Child Development621–45
7.
CondryK FSmithW CSpelkeE S, 2001“Development of perceptual organization”, in Emerging Cognitive Abilities in Early Infancy Eds LacerdaFVon HofstenCHeimannM (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 1–28
8.
CsibraG, 2001“Illusory contour figures are perceived as occluding surfaces by 8-month-old infants”Developmental Science47–11
9.
CsibraGDavisGSpratlingM WJohnsonM H, 2000“Gamma oscillation and object processing in the infant brain”Science2901582–1585
10.
DavisGDriverJ, 1994“Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system”Nature371791–793
11.
DriverJDavisGRussellCTurattoMFreemanE, 2001“Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects”Cognition8061–95
12.
DuncanJHumphreysG W, 1989“Visual search and stimulus similarity”Psychological Review96433–458
13.
GraboweckyMTreismanA, 1989“Attention and fixation in subjective contour perception”Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science30457 [abstract]
14.
GurnseyRPoirierFGasconE, 1996“There is no evidence that Kanizsa-type subjective contours can be detected in parallel”Perception25861–874
15.
HerrmannC SMecklingerA, 2000“Magnetoencephalographic responses to illusory figures: Early eked gamma is affected by processing stimulus features”International Journal of Psychophysiology38265–281
16.
HoodB MAtkinsonJ, 1990“Sensory visual loss and cognitive deficits in the selective attentional system of normal infants and neurologically impaired children”Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology321067–1077
17.
JohnsonM H, 1995“The development of visual attention: a cognitive neuroscience perspective”, in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ed. GazzanigaM S (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 735–747
18.
JohnsonS PMasonU, 2002“Perception of kinetic illusory contours by two-month-old infants”Child Development7322–34
19.
KanizsaG, 1955“Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea”Rivista di Psicologia497–30
20.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger)
21.
KavšekM J, 2002“The perception of static subjective contours in infancy”Child Development73331–334
22.
KavšekM JYonasA, 2006“The perception of moving subjective contours by 4-month-old infants”Perception35215–227
23.
LiXCaveK RWolfeJ M, 2008“Kanizsa-style subjective contours do not guide attentional deployment in visual search but line termination contours do”Perception & Psychophysics70477–488
24.
McSorleyEFindlayJ M, 2003“Saccade target selection in visual search: Accuracy improves when more distractors are present”Journal of Vision3877–892
25.
MotterB CBelkyE J, 1998“The guidance of eye movements during active visual search”Vision Research381805–1815
26.
OtsukaYKanazawaSYamaguchiM K, 2004“The effect of support ratio on infants' perception of illusory contours”Perception33807–816
27.
OtsukaYYamaguchiM K, 2003“Infants' perception of illusory contours in static and moving figures”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology86244–251
28.
SenkowskiDRöttgerSGrimmSFoxeJ JHerrmannC S, 2005“Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data”Neuropsychologia43872–886
29.
SheaS L, 1992“Eye movements: Developmental aspects”, in The Role of Eye Movements in Perceptual Processes Eds ChekalukELlewellynK R (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 239–306
30.
TreismanA, 1998“The perception of features and objects”, in Visual Attention Ed. WrightR D (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 26–54
31.
TreismanAGeladeG, 1980“A features integration theory of attention”Cognitive Psychology1297–136
32.
ValenzaEBulfH, 2007“The role of kinetic information in newborns' perception of illusory contours”Developmental Science10492–501
33.
WadaYShiraiNOtsukaYMidorikawaAKanazawaSDanIYamaguchiM K, 2009“Sound enhances detection of visual target during infancy: A study using illusory contours”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology102315–322
34.
WarmJ SDemberW NPadichR ABecknerW NJonesS, 1987“The role of illumination level in the strength of subjective contours”, in The Perception of Illusory Contours Eds PetrySMeyerG E (New York: Springer) pp 176–182
35.
YantisS, 1993“Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19676–681
36.
ZelinskyG JSheinbergD L, 1997“Eye-movement during parallel–serial visual search”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23244–262
