Grouping and boundary perception are central to many aspects of sensory processing in cognition. We present a comparative study of recently published computational models of boundary perception in music. In doing so, we make three contributions. First, we hypothesise a relationship between expectation and grouping in auditory perception, and introduce a novel information-theoretic model of perceptual segmentation to test the hypothesis. Although we apply the model to musical melody, it is applicable in principle to sequential grouping in other areas of cognition. Second, we address a methodological consideration in the analysis of ambiguous stimuli that produce different percepts between individuals. We propose and demonstrate a solution to this problem, based on clustering of participants prior to analysis. Third, we conduct the first comparative analysis of probabilistic-learning and rule-based models of perceptual grouping in music. In spite of having only unsupervised exposure to music, the model performs comparably to rule-based models based on expert musical knowledge, supporting a role for probabilistic learning in perceptual segmentation of music.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbdallahS APlumbleyM D, 2009“Information dynamics: Patterns of expectation and surprise in the perception of music”Convection Science2189–117
2.
AttneaveF, 1959Applications of Information Theory to Psychology (New York: Holt)
3.
BalcetisEDunningD, 2006“See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology91612–625
4.
BarlowH B, 1959“Sensory mechanisms, the reduction of redundancy, and intelligence”, in Proceedings of a Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Processes (London: Natural Physical Laboratory, Teddington—London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office) pp 537–559
5.
BodR, 1998Beyond Grammar: An Experience-based Theory of Language (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications)
6.
BodR, 2001“Memory-based models of melodic analysis: Challenging the Gestalt principles”Journal of New Music Research3027–37
7.
BowerG, 1970“Organizational factors in memory”Cognitive Psychology118–46
8.
BregmanA S, 1990Auditory Scene Analysis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
9.
BrentM R, 1999a“An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery”Machine Learning3471–105
10.
BrentM R, 1999b“Speech segmentation and word discovery: A computational perspective”Trends in Cognitive Sciences3294–301
11.
BrochardRDufourADrakeCScheiberC, 2000“Functional brain imaging of rhythm perception”, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition Eds WoodsCLuckGBrochardRSeddonFSlobodaJ A (Keele: University of Keele)
12.
BruceVGreenPGeorgesonM, 2003Visual Perception: Physiology Psychology and Ecology (London: Psychology Press)
13.
BrudererM J, 2008Perception and Modeling of Segment Boundaries in Popular Music PhD thesis, J F Schouten School for User-System Interaction Research, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands
14.
CambouropoulosE, 2001“The local boundary detection model (LBDM) and its application in the study of expressive timing”, in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (San Francisco, CA: ICMA) pp 17–22
15.
CambouropoulosE, 2006“Musical parallelism and melodic segmentation: A computational approach”Music Perception23249–269
16.
ChaterN, 1996“Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organisation”Psychological Review103566–581
17.
ChaterN, 1999“The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle?”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A52273–302
CohenP RAdamsNHeeringaB, 2007“Voting experts: An unsupervised algorithm for segmenting sequences”Intelligent Data Analysis11607–625
20.
DeliègeI, 1987“Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules”Music Perception4325–360
21.
DeliègeI, 1998“Wagner ‘alte weise’: Une approche perceptive”Musicœ Scientiœ Special Issue63–90
22.
DowlingW J, 1973“Rhythmic groups and subjective chunks in memory for melodies”Perception & Psychophysics1437–40
23.
ElmanJ L, 1990“Finding structure in time”Cognitive Science14179–211
24.
EverittB SDunnG, 2001Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (London: Hodder Arnold)
25.
FerrandMNelsonPWigginsG, 2003“Unsupervised learning of melodic segmentation: A memory-based approach”, in Proceedings of the 5th Triennial ESCOM Conference Eds KopiezRLehmannA CWoltherIWolfC (Hanover: Hanover University of Music and Drama) pp 141–144
26.
FleissJ L, 1971“Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters”Psychological Bulletin76378–382
27.
FodorJ ABeverT G, 1965“The psychological reality of linguistic segments”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior4414–420
28.
FranklandB WCohenA J, 2004“Parsing of melody: Quantification and testing of the local grouping rules of Lerdahl and Jackendoff's A Generative Theory of Tonal Music”Music Perception21499–543
29.
FristonK, 2010“The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?”Nature Reviews Neuroscience11127–138
30.
GoldwaterS, 2007Nonparametric Bayesian Models of Lexical Acquisition PhD thesis, Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, USA
31.
GregoryA H, 1978“Perception of clicks in music”Perception & Psychophysics24171–174
32.
HaleJ, 2006“Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence”Cognitive Science30643–672
33.
IttiLBaldiP, 2006“Bayesian surprise attracts human attention”, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18 Eds WeissYSchölkopfBPlattJ (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 547–554
34.
JusczykP W, 1997The Discovery of Spoken Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
35.
JusczykP WKrumhanslC L, 1993“Pitch and rhythmic patterns affecting infant's sensitivity to musical phrase structure”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19627–640
36.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World)
37.
KrumhanslC L, 1990Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
38.
KulczynskiS, 1927“Die Planzenassoziationen der Pienien”Bulletin International de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres, Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles B57–203
39.
KurbyC AZacksJ M, 2007“Segmentation in the perception and memory of events”Trends in Cognitive Sciences1272–19
40.
LadefogedPBroadbentD E, 1960“Perception of sequences in auditory events”Journal of Experimental Psychology12162–170
41.
LandisJ RKochG G, 1977“The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data”Biometrics33159–174
42.
LeopoldD ALogothetisN K, 1999“Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception”Trends in Cognitive Sciences3254–264
43.
LerdahlFJackendoffR, 1983A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
Liegeoise-ChauvelCPeretzIBabaiMLaguittonVChauvelP, 1998“Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing”Brain1211853–1867
46.
McAdamsSWinsbergSDonnadieuSSoeteG DKrimphoffJ, 1995“Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities and latent subject classes”Psychological Research58177–192
47.
MacKayD J C, 2003Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
48.
ManningC DSchützeH, 1999Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
49.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
50.
MelucciMOrioN, 2002“A comparison of manual and automatic melody segmentation”, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Music Information Retrieval Ed. FingerhutM (Paris: IRCAM) pp 7–14
51.
MeyerL B, 1957“Meaning in music and information theory”Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism15412–424
52.
NarmourE, 1990The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication-realisation Model (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
53.
NewtsonD, 1973“Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2828–38
54.
de NooijerJWieringFVolkATabachneck-SchijfH J M, 2008“An experimental comparison of human and automatic music segmentation”, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition Eds MiyazakiKAdachiMHiragaYNakajimaYTsuzakiM (Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions) pp 399–407
55.
PearceM TConklinDWigginsG A, 2005“Methods for combining statistical models of music”, in Computer Music Modelling and Retrieval Ed. WiilU K (Berlin: Springer) pp 95–312
56.
PearceM TMüllensiefenDWigginsG A, 2010a“Melodic grouping in music information retrieval: New methods and applications”, in Advances in Music Information Retrieval Eds RasZ WWieczorkowskaA (Berlin: Springer) pp 364–388
57.
PearceM TRuizM HKapasiSWigginsG ABhattacharyaJ, 2010b“Unsupervised statistical learning underpins computational, behavioural and neural manifestations of musical expectation”NeuroImage50302–313
58.
PearceM TWigginsG A, 2004“Improved methods for statistical modelling of monophonic music”Journal of New Music Research33367–385
59.
PearceM TWigginsG A, 2006“Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning”Music Perception23377–405
60.
PearlmutterN JMacdonaldM C, 1995“Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution”Journal of Memory and Language34521–542
61.
PeretzI, 1989“Clustering in music: An appraisal of task factors”International Journal of Psychology24157–178
62.
PeretzI, 1990“Processing of local and global musical information by unilateral brain-damaged patients”Brain1131185–1205
63.
ReynoldsJ RZacksJ MBraverT S, 2007“A computational model of event segmentation from perceptual prediction”Cognitive Science31613–643
64.
SaffranJ R, 2003“Absolute pitch in infancy and adulthood: The role of tonal structure”Developmental Science637–49
65.
SaffranJ RAslinR NNewportE L, 1996“Statistical learning by 8-month old infants”Science2741926–1928
66.
SaffranJ RGriepentrogG J, 2001“Absolute pitch in infant auditory learning: Evidence for developmental reorganization”Developmental Psychology3774–85
67.
SaffranJ RJohnsonE KAslinR NNewportE L, 1999“Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults”Cognition7027–52
68.
SchaffrathH, 1995“The Essen folksong collection”, in Database Containing 6, 255 Folksong Transcriptions in the Kern Format and a 34-Page Research Guide [Computer Database] Ed. HuronD (Menlo Park, CA: CCARH)
69.
SchellenbergE G, 1997“Simplifying the implication-realisation model of melodic expectancy”Music Perception14295–318
70.
ShannonC E, 1948“A mathematical theory of communication”Bell System Technical Journal27379–423 and 623–656
71.
SlobodaJ AGregoryA H, 1980“The psychological reality of musical segments”Canadian Journal of Psychology34274–280
SpiroN, 2006“A new method for assessing consistency of real-time identification of phrase-parts and its initial application”, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition Eds BaroniMAddessiRCaterinaRCostaM (Bologna: SMPC and ESCOM) pp 793–800
74.
StafferT H, 1985“Representation of phrase structure in the perception of music”Music Perception3191–220
75.
TanNAielloRBeverT G, 1981“Harmonic structure as a determinant of melodic organization”Memory and Cognition9533–539
76.
TemperleyD, 2001The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
77.
ThomBSpevakCHöthkerK, 2002“Melodic segmentation: Evaluating the performance of algorithms and musical experts”, in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (San Francisco, CA: ICMA) pp 65–72
78.
WaughNNormanD A, 1965“Primary memory”Psychological Review7289–104
79.
WigginsG A, 2007“Models of musical similarity”Musicœ Scientiœ (Discussion Forum 4a) 315–337
80.
WigginsG A, 2010“A cross-domain model: grouping of phonemes into syllables by a model of melodic segmentation”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition Eds DemorestS MMorrisonS JCampbellP S (Seattle, WA: ICMPC and Causal Productions) page 75
