Factors that are important to successful face recognition, such as features, configuration, and pigmentation/reflectance, are all subject to change when a face has been engraved with ink markings. Here we show that the application of facial tattoos, in the form of spiral patterns (typically associated with the Maori tradition of a Moko), disrupts face recognition to a similar extent as face inversion, with recognition accuracy little better than chance performance (2AFC). These results indicate that facial tattoos can severely disrupt our ability to recognise a face that previously did not have the pattern.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EllisH DDaviesG MShepherdJ W, 1978“Remembering pictures of real and unreal faces: Some practical and theoretical considerations”British Journal of Psychology69467–474
2.
McKoneEYovelG, 2009“Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review16778–797
3.
RuaMTuhoeNAwaNWhakaueN, 1999“Contemporary attitudes to traditional facial Ta Moko: Aworking paper”, in Maori and Psychology: Research and Practice Ed. RobertsonN, Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Maori and Psychology Research Unit, Hamilton, New Zealand
4.
RussellRBiedermanINederhouserMSinhaP, 2006“The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces”Vision Research47157–165
5.
SimmonsD R, 1986Ta Moko: The Art of Maori Tattoo (Auckland, New Zealand: Reed)
6.
UedaSKoyamaT, 2010“Influence of make-up on facial recognition”Perception39260–264
