In two experiments we examined the role of visual horizon information on absolute egocentric distance judgments to on-ground targets. Sedgwick [1983, in Human and Machine Vision (New York: Academic Press) pp 425–458] suggested that the visual system may utilize the angle of declination from a horizontal line of sight to the target location (horizon–distance relation) to determine absolute distances on infinite ground surfaces. While studies have supported this hypothesis, less is known about the specific cues (vestibular, visual) used to determine horizontal line of sight. We investigated this question by requiring observers to judge distances under degraded vision given an unaltered or raised visual horizon. The results suggest that visual horizon information does influence perception of absolute distances as evident through two different action-based measures: walking or throwing without vision to previously viewed targets. Distances were judged as shorter in the presence of a raised visual horizon. The results are discussed with respect to how the visual system accurately determines absolute distance to objects on a finite ground plane and for their implications for understanding space perception in low-vision individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CongdonNO'ColmainBKlaverC C WKleinRMuñozBFriedmanD SKempenJTaylorH RMitchellPHymanL, 2004“Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States”Archives of Ophthalmology122477–485
2.
EbyD WLoomisJ M, 1987“A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues”Perception & Psychophysics41308–312
3.
FukusimaS SLoomisJ MDa SilvaJ A, 1997“Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2386–100
4.
GardnerP LMon-WilliamsM, 2001“Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension”Experimental Brain Research136379–385
5.
GibsonJ J, 1950The Perception of the Visual World (Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin)
6.
GrutzmacherR PAndreJ TOwensD A, 1997“Gaze inclination: A source of oculomotor information for distance perception”, in Studies in Perception and Action IV: Ninth International Conference on Perception and Action (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 229–232
7.
LiWMatinL, 1995“Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization”Perception & Psychophysics5771–83
8.
LoomisJ MKlatzkyR LGolledgeR GCicinelliJ GPellegrinoJ WFryP A, 1993“Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General12273–91
9.
LoomisJ MKnappJ, 2003“Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments”, in Virtual and Adaptive Environments Eds HettingerL JHaasM W (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 21–46
10.
LoomisJ MSilvaJ A DFujitaNFukusimaS S, 1992“Visual space perception and visually directed action”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18906–921
LudtRGoodrichG L, 2002“Change in visual perception detection distances for low vision travelers as a result of dynamic visual assessment and training”Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness967–21
13.
MatinLFoxC R, 1989“Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity”Vision Research29315–324
14.
MatinLLiW, 1995“Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch”Perception & Psychophysics5784–104
15.
MengJ CSedgwickH A, 2001“Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces”Perception & Psychophysics631–15
16.
MengJ CSedgwickH A, 2002“Distance perception across spatial discontinuities”Perception & Psychophysics641–14
17.
MessingRDurginF, 2005“Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays”ACM Transactions on Applied Perception2234–250
18.
OoiT LWuBHeZ J, 2001“Distance determination by the angular declination below the horizon”Nature141197–200
19.
OzkanKBraunsteinM L, 2010“Background surface and horizon effects in the perception of relative size and distance”Visual Cognition18229–254
20.
PhilbeckJ WLoomisJ M, 1997“Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions”Journal of Experimental Psychology2372–85
21.
RieserJ JAshmeadD HTalorC RYoungquistG A, 1990“Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets”Perception19675–689
22.
RieserJ JHillE WTalorC RBradfieldARosenS, 1992“Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking”Journal of Experimental Psychology121210–221
23.
SahmC SCreem-RegehrS HThompsonW BWillemsenP, 2005“Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in real and virtual environments”ACM Transactions on Applied Perception135–45
24.
SedgwickH A, 1983“Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available visual information from texture and perspective”, in Human and Machine Vision Eds BeckJHopeBRosenfeldA (New York: Academic Press) pp 425–458
ThompsonW BDildaVCreem-RegehrS H, 2007“Absolute distance perception to locations off the ground plane”Perception361559–1571
27.
ThompsonW BWillemsenPGoochA ACreem-RegehrS HLoomisJ MBeallA C, 2004“Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments?”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments13560–571
28.
ThomsonJ A, 1983“Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9427–443
29.
WuB WHeZ JOoiT L, 2007“The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment”Perception & Psychophysics69654–672
