Our aim in this study was to examine the influence of sound-marker durations on the perception of simple rhythm patterns. These comprised three successive sounds marking two neighbouring time intervals, T1 and T2, with their onsets. We varied the durations of each of the three sound markers to make them either 20 or 60 ms. Durations of T1 and T2 were also varied, but the total duration of T1 and T2 was fixed at either 240 or 480 ms. In experiment 1, participants compared the durations of T1 and T2. In experiment 2, the subjective duration of each interval was measured separately. We found that lengthening the duration of the sound marker which terminated an interval increased the subjective duration of that interval: lengthening the duration of the second marker increased the subjective duration of T1, and lengthening the duration of the third marker increased the subjective duration of T2. Lengthening the duration of the first marker increased the subjective duration of T1 when T1 + T2 = 240 ms, especially when T1 > T2. This effect of first-marker duration, which could not be observed with single intervals used in the control conditions, seemed to enhance the contrast between T1 and T2. The effects of marker durations are associated with previous time-perception studies, in which single time intervals were used. They are discussed in the context of rhythm-perception studies, in which more complex sound patterns have been used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CraigJ C, 1973“A constant error in the perception of brief temporal intervals”Perception & Psychophysics1399–104
2.
DivenyiP LSachsR M, 1978“Discrimination of time intervals bounded by tone bursts”Perception & Psychophysics24429–436
3.
EfronR, 1970“The relationship between the duration of a stimulus and the duration of a perception”Neuropsychologia837–55
4.
EssensP JPovelD-J, 1985“Metrical and nonmetrical representations of temporal patterns”Perception & Psychophysics371–7
5.
FastiHZwickerE, 2007Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models (Berlin: Springer) pp 271–276
6.
FraisseP, 1982“Rhythm and tempo”, in The Psychology of Music Ed. DeutschD (New York: Academic Press) pp 149–180
7.
FraněkMMatesJRadiiTBeckKPöppelE, 1994“Sensorimotor synchronization: Motor responses to pseudoregular auditory patterns”Perception & Psychophysics55204–217
8.
FujishimaYNakajimaY, 2006“The effect of marker duration on time-shrinking”poster presented at the Fourth Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Acoustical Society of Japan, Honolulu, Hawaii (Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1203085
9.
GrondinS, 2003“Sensory modalities and temporal processing”, in Time and Mind 2: Information Processing Perspectives Ed. HelfrichH (Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber) pp 75–92
10.
GrondinSIvryR BFranzEPerreaultLMettheL, 1996“Markers' influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals”Perception & Psychophysics58424–433
11.
GrondinSMcAuleyJ D, 2009“Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences”Perception381541–1559
12.
GuilfordJ P, 1954Psychometric Methods (New York: McGraw-Hill) pp 118–153
13.
HandelS, 1989Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 383–459
14.
HandelS, 1993“The effect of tempo and tone duration on rhythm discrimination”Perception & Psychophysics54370–382
15.
HasuoENakajimaY, 2007“Effects of sound marker durations on the perception of inter-onset time intervals”, paper presented at the23rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, Tokyo, Japan (Tokyo: International Society for Psychophysics) pp 113–118
16.
IwamiyaSNakajimaYUedaKKawaharaKTakadaM, 2003“Technical listening training: Improvement of sound sensitivity for acoustic engineers and sound designers”Acoustical Science and Technology2427–31
17.
KatoHTsuzakiM, 1994“Intensity effect on discrimination of auditory duration flanked by preceding and succeeding tones”Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan E15349–351
18.
KatoHTsuzakiMSagisakaY, 2003“Functional differences between vowel onsets and offsets in temporal perception of speech: local-change detection and speaking-rate discrimination”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1133379–3389
19.
LargeE W, 2008“Resonating to musical rhythm: theory and experiment”, in Psychology of Time Ed. GrondinS (Bingley, W. Yorks: Emerald) pp 189–231
20.
McAdamsSDrakeC, 2002“Auditory perception and cognition”, in Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychologyvolume 1 Sensation and Perception third edition, Ed. YantisS (New York: John Wiley) pp 424–432
21.
MitsudoTNakajimaYRemijnG BTakeichiHGotoYTobimatsuS, 2009“Electrophysiological evidence of auditory temporal perception related to the assimilation between two neighboring time intervals”Neuroquantology7114–127
22.
MiyauchiRNakajimaY, 2005“Bilateral assimilation of two neighboring empty time intervals”Music Perception22411–424
23.
MiyauchiRNakajimaY, 2007“The category of 1:1 ratio caused by assimilation of two neighboring empty time intervals”Human Movement Science26717–727
24.
MugitaniRPonsFFaisLDietrichCWerkerJ FAmanoS, 2009“Perception of vowel length by Japanese- and English-learning infants”Developmental Psychology45236–247
25.
NakajimaY, 1987“A model of empty duration perception”Perception16485–520
26.
NakajimaYTen HoopenGHilkhuysenGSasakiT, 1992“Time-shrinking: A discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns”Perception & Psychophysics51504–507
27.
NakajimaYTen HoopenGSasakiTYamamotoKKadotaMSimonsMSuetomiD, 2004“Time-shrinking: the process of unilateral temporal assimilation”Perception331061–1079
28.
NakajimaYTen HoopenGVan der WilkR, 1991“A new illusion of time perception”Music Perception8431–448
29.
NakajimaYTakeichiH, 2010“Explicit and implicit temporal judgments visualized by similarities in electrophysiological signal subspaces”paper presented at the Auditory Research Meeting of the Acoustical Society of Japan, Fukuoka, Japan, 40, H-2010-145, 801–806
30.
PatelA D, 2008Music, Language, and the Brain (New York: Oxford University Press) pp 95–179
31.
PennerM J, 1976“The effect of marker variability on the discrimination of temporal intervals”Perception & Psychophysics19466–469
32.
PovelD-J, 1981“Internal representation of simple temporal patterns”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance73–18
33.
RammsayerT HLeutnerD, 1996“Temporal discrimination as a function of marker duration”Perception & Psychophysics581213–1223
SasakiTSuetomiDNakajimaYTen HoopenG, 2002“Time-shrinking, its propagation, and Gestalt principles”Perception & Psychophysics64919–931
36.
ScharfB, 1978“Loudness”, in Handbook of Perception volume IV Hearing Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P (New York: Academic Press) pp 204–209
37.
SchubertEFabianD, 2001“Perception and preference of dotted 6/8 patterns by experienced and less experienced baroque music listeners”Journal of Music Perception and Cognition7113–132
38.
SchulzeH H, 1989“The perception of temporal deviations in isochronic patterns”Perception & Psychophysics45291–296
39.
TakeichiHMitsudoTNakajimaYRemijnG BGotoYTobimatsuS, in press “A neural decoding approach to auditory temporal assimilation”Neural Computing and Applications
40.
TanakaSKubozonoH, 1999Introduction to Japanese Pronunciation: Theory and Practice (Tokyo: Kurosio) pp 5–14
41.
Ten HoopenGHartsuikerRSasakiTNakajimaYTanakaMTsumuraT, 1995“Auditory isochrony: time-shrinking and temporal patterns”Perception24577–593
42.
Ten HoopenGSasakiTNakajimaYRemijnG BMassierBRhebergenK SHollemanW, 2006“Time-shrinking and categorical temporal ratio perception: Evidence for a 1:1 temporal category”Music Perception241–22
43.
WoodrowH, 1928“Behavior with respect to short temporal stimulus forms”Journal of Experimental Psychology11167–193
44.
YamashitaMNakajimaY, 1999“The effect of marker duration on time-shrinking”, in Music: Mind and Science Ed. YiS W (Seoul: Seoul National University Press) pp 211–218
