People are very good at discriminating faces despite their gross similarity. Our ability to capitalize on the variance that exists between faces has been attributed to an adaptive face-coding system. Evidence from psychophysical adaptation paradigms has generally supported this view, although results from other paradigms have suggested alternative accounts. The composite face-effect (CFE), for example, has been used to argue that holistic processing supports face discrimination. The question addressed here is whether the notion of holistic processing can be integrated with the notion of an adaptive face-coding system. Experiment 1 clearly demonstrates that the CFE acts on contrast-reversed faces while experiment 2 reveals that face-space adaptation depends on contrast polarity, consistent with previous observations of contrast-reversal impairing discrimination performance. Our results suggest that two popular theoretical frame-works in the face-recognition literature can be integrated, with holistic processing occurring at an earlier stage than face discrimination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfrazACavanaghP, 2009“The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations”Journal of Vision9(10) 10, 1–17, doi:10.1167/9.10.10
2.
CliffordC W GRhodesG, 2005Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-effects in High-level Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
3.
CollishawS MHoleG J, 2000“Featural and configural processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity”Perception29893–909
4.
DakinS COmigieD, 2009“Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity”Vision Research492285–2296
5.
FarahM JWilsonK DDrainMTanakaJ N, 1998“What is ‘special’ about face perception?”Psychological Review105482–498
6.
FergusRPeronaPZissermanA, 2003“Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, WI, 18 – 20 June, Volume 2 (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society) pp 264–271, doi:10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211479
7.
FreiwaldW ATsaoD YLivingstoneM S, 2009“A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe”Nature Neuroscience121187–1196
8.
GalperR E, 1970“Recognition of faces in photographic negative”Psychonomic Science19207–208
9.
GoffauxV, 2008“The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges”Acta Psychologica128119–126
10.
GoffauxVRossionB, 2006“Faces are ‘spatial’ – Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance321023–1039
11.
HarrisAAguirreG K, 2008“The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience20863–878
12.
HoleG J, 1994“Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces”Perception2365–74
13.
HoleG JGeorgeP ADunsmoreV, 1999“Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives”Perception28341–359
14.
JacquesCd'ArripeORossionB, 2007“The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination”Journal of Vision7(8) 3, 1 – 9, doi:10.1167/7.8.3
15.
JaquetERhodesGHaywardH, 2008“Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces”Visual Cognition16734–753
16.
KempRMcMannusCPiggotT, 1990“Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images”Perception19531–543
17.
KempRPikeGWhitePMusselmanA, 1996“Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues”Perception2537–52
18.
KhuranaBSmithW CBakerM T, 2000“Not to be and then to be: Visual representation of ignored unfamiliar faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26246–263
19.
KonarYBennettP JSekulerA B, 2010“Holistic processing is not correlated with face identification accuracy”Psychological Science2138–43
20.
LeeKByattGRhodesG, 2002“Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: Testing the face-space framework”Psychological Science11379–385
21.
LeopoldD ABondarI VGieseM A, 2006“Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in monkey inferotemporal cortex”Nature442572–575
LevinD T, 2000“Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General129559–574
24.
LittleA CDeBruineL MJonesB C, 2005“Sex-contingent after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B2722283–2287
25.
LittleA CDeBruineL MJonesB CWaittC, 2008“Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species”Cognition1061537–1547
26.
LofflerGYourganovGWilkinsonFWilsonH, 2005“fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces”Nature Neuroscience81386–1390
27.
McKoneE, 2009“Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances”Vision Research49268–283
28.
McKoneEKanwisherNDuchaineB, 2007“Can generic expertise explain spatial processing for faces?”Trends in Cognitive Science118–15
29.
McKoneEMartiniPNakayamaK, 2001“Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27573–599
30.
MaurerDLe GrandRMondlochC J, 2002“The many faces of configural processing”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6255–260
31.
MichelCRossionBHanJChungC-SCaldaraR, 2006“Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race”Psychological Science17608–615
32.
RhodesGJefferyLWatsonTJaquetEWinklerCCliffordC W G, 2004“Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face coding mechanisms”Current Biology142119–2123
33.
RichlerJ JCheungO SGauthierI, in press “Holistic processing predicts face recognition”Psychological Science doi:10.1177/0956797611401753
34.
RichlerJ JMackM LGauthierIPalmeriT J, 2009“Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance”Vision Research492856–2861
35.
RobbinsRMcKoneE, 2003“Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?”Cognition8879–107
36.
RobbinsRMcKoneE, 2007“No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks”Cognition10334–79
37.
RollsE TBaylisG C, 1986“Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey”Experimental Brain Research6538–48
38.
RossionB, 2008“Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception”Acta Psychologica128274–289
39.
RossionB, 2009“Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis”Acta Psychologica132300–312
40.
SergentJ, 1984“An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception”British Journal of Psychology75221–242
41.
TanakaJ WFarahM, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology46225–245
42.
TaubertJ, 2009“Chimpanzee faces are ‘special’ to humans”Perception38343–356
43.
TaubertJAlaisD, 2009“The composite illusion requires composite face stimuli to be biologically plausible”Vision Research491877–1885
44.
TsaoD YLivingstoneM S, 2008“Mechanisms of face perception”Annual Review of Neuroscience31411–437
45.
ValentineT, 1991“A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A43161–204
46.
ValentineTEndoM, 1992“Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology44671–703
47.
WebsterM AKapingDMizokamiYDuhamelP, 2004“Adaption to natural face categories”Nature428557–560
48.
WebsterM AMacLinO H, 1999“Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review6647–653
49.
WeyrauchBHuangJHeiseleBBlanzV, 2004“Component-based face recognition with 3D morphable models”, in Proceedings of the First IEEE Workshop on Face Processing in Video, Washington, DC, 27 June – 2 July (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society) doi:10.1109/CVPR.2004.41
50.
YamashitaJ AHardyJ LDeValoisK KWebsterM A, 2005“Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance31420–437
51.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145
52.
YoungA WHellawellD JHayD C, 1987“Configural information in face perception”Perception16747–759
53.
ZhaoLChubbC, 2001“The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect”Vision Research412979–2994
