Embodied cognition and perceptual symbol theories assume that higher cognition interacts with and is grounded in perception and action. Recent experiments have shown that language processing interacts with perceptual processing in various ways, indicating that linguistic representations have a strong perceptual character. In the present study, we have used signal detection theory to investigate whether the comprehension of written sentences, implying either horizontal or vertical orientation, could improve the participants' visual sensitivity for discriminating between horizontal or vertical square-wave gratings and noise. We tested this prediction by conducting one main and one follow-up experiment. Our results indicate that language can, indeed, affect perception at such a low level of the visual process and thus provide further support for the embodied theories of cognition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aziz-ZadehLFiebachCNaranayanSFeldmanJDodgeEIvryR, 2008“Modulation of the FFA and PPA by language related to faces and places”Social Neuroscience3229–238
2.
BarsalouL W, 1999“Perceptual symbol systems”Behavioral and Brain Sciences22577–660
3.
BarsalouL W, 2008“Grounded cognition”Annual Review of Psychology59617–645
4.
BinderJ RDesaiR H, 2011“The neurobiology of semantic memory”Trends in Cognitive Sciences15527–536
5.
BoroditskyL, 2000“Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors”Cognition751–28
6.
EstesZVergesMBarsalouL W, 2008“Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects' typical location”Psychological Science1993–97
7.
FarahM J, 1989“Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms?”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15188–194
8.
Fincher-KieferR, 2001“Perceptual components of situation models”Memory and Cognition29336–343
9.
FodorJ A, 1975The Language of Thought (New York: Crowell)
10.
ForsterK IForsterJ C, 2003“DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers35116–124
11.
GalleseVLakoffG, 2005“The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge”Cognitive Neuropsychology22455–479
12.
GlenbergA M, 1997“What memory is for”Behavioral and Brain Sciences201–55
13.
GlenbergA MKaschakM P, 2002“Grounding language in action”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9558–565
14.
KaschakM PMaddenC JTherriaultD JYaxleyR HAveyardMBlanchardA AZwaanR A, 2005“Perception of motion affects language processing”Cognition94B79 – B89
15.
LakoffG, 1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
MeteyardLBahramiBViglioccoG, 2007“Motion detection and motion verbs. Language affects low-level visual perception”Psychological Science181007–1013
21.
PulvermüllerF, 1999“Words in the brain's language”Behavioral and Brain Sciences22253–336
22.
PulvermüllerF, 2005“Brain mechanisms linking language and action”Nature Reviews Neuroscience6576–582
23.
PylyshynZ, 1984Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
24.
RichardsonD CSpiveyM JBarsalouL WMcRaeK, 2003“Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs”Cognitive Science27767–780
25.
RichardsonD CSpiveyM JEdelmanSNaplesA, 2001“‘Language is spatial’: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs”, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 873–878
26.
ShippSAdamsD LMoutoussisKZekiS, 2009“Feature binding in the feedback layers of area V2”Cerebral Cortex192230–2239
27.
SpeerN KReynoldsJ RSwallowK MZacksJ M, 2009“Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences”Psychological Science20989–999
28.
StanfieldR AZwaanR A, 2001“The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition”Psychological Science12153–156
29.
StanislawHTodorovN, 1999“Calculation of signal detection theory measures”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers31137–149
30.
WichmannF AHillN J, 2001“The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit”Perception & Psychophysics631293–1313
31.
YaxleyR HZwaanR A, 2007“Simulating visibility during language comprehension”Cognition105229–236
32.
YeshurunYCarrascoM, 1998“Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution”Nature39672–75
33.
ZekiS, 1978“Functional specialization in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey”Nature274423–428
34.
ZekiSWatsonJ DLueckC JFristonK JKennardCFrackowiakR S, 1991“A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex”Journal of Neuroscience11641–649
35.
ZwaanR A, 2004“The Immersed Experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension”The Psychology of Learning and Motivation4435–62
36.
ZwaanR AMaddenC JYaxleyR HAveyardM E, 2004“Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension”Cognitive Science28611–619
37.
ZwaanR AStanfieldR AYaxleyR H, 2002“Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects”Psychological Science13168–171
