How are works of art that present scenes that match potential expectations processed in the brain, in contrast to such scenes that can never occur in real life because they would violate physical laws? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the processing of surrealistic and naturalistic images in visual artworks. Looking at naturalistic paintings leads to a significantly higher activation in the visual cortex and in the precuneus. Humans apparently own a sensitive mechanism even for artistic representations of the visual world to separate the impossible from what potentially matches physical reality. The observation reported here also suggests that sensory input corresponding to a realistic representation of the visual world elicits higher self-referential processing.
AmuntsKSchleicherAZillesK, 2007“Cytoarchitecture of the cerebral cortex—More than localization”NeuroImage371061–1065
2.
BaoYPöppelE, 2007“Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: Evidence from inhibition of return”Cognitive Processing837–44
3.
BaoYSanderTTrahmsLPöppelELeiQZhouB, 2011“The eccentricity effect of inhibition of return is resistant to practice”Neuroscience Letters50047–51
4.
CavannaA ETrimbleM R, 2006“The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates”Brain129564–583
5.
ChunM MGolombJ DTurk-BrownN B, 2011“A taxonomy of external and internal attention”Annual Review of Psychology6273–101
6.
EgethH EYantisS, 1997“Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course”Annual Review of Psychology48267–297
7.
EpsteinS, 1985“The implications of cognitive-experiential self theory for research in social psychology and personality”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology15283–310
8.
GibsonJ J, 1966The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
9.
GibsonJ J, 1967“New reasons for realism”Synthese17162–172
10.
GodijnRTheeuwesJ, 2003“Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29882–896
11.
GoebelRMuckliLKimD-S, 2004“Visual system”, in The Human Nervous System2nd edition, Eds PaxinosGMaiJ K, (London: Elsevier Academic Press) pp 1280–1305
12.
HanSNorthoffG, 2008“Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition”Nature Reviews Neuroscience9646–654
13.
HeineS JProulxTVohsK D, 2006“Meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations”Personality and Social Psychology Review1088–110
14.
von HelmholtzH, 1896Handbuch der physiologischen Optik2nd edition (Hamburg and Leipzig: Verlag von Leopold Voss)
15.
von HolstE, 1954“Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs”British Journal of Animal Behaviour289–94
16.
KanwisherNChunM MDermottJ MLeddenP J, 1996“Functional imaging of human visual recognition”Cognitive Brain Research555–67
17.
KeilASabatinelliDDingMLangP JIhssenNHeimS, 2009“Re-entrant projections modulate visual cortex in affective perception: Evidence from Granger causality analysis”Human Brain Mapping30532–540
18.
KlingerE, 1998“The search for meaning in evolutionary perspective and its clinical implications”, in The Human Quest for Meaning: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Clinical Application Eds WongP T PFryP S, (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press) pp 137–186
19.
KoivistoMSilvantoJ, 2012“Visual feature binding: The critical time window of V1/V2 and parietal activity”NeuroImage591608–1614
20.
LederHBelkeBOeberstAAugustinD, 2004“A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments”British Journal of Psychology95489–508
21.
PöppelE, 2005“Complementarity as a generative principle in visual perception”Visual Cognition12665–670
22.
PöppelE, 2009“Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B3641887–1896
23.
PöppelE, 2010“Perceptual identity and personal self”, in Personality from Biological, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives Eds MaruszewskiTFajkowskaMEysenckM W, (New York: Eliot Werner) pp 77–84
24.
PöppelEBaoYZhouB, 2011“Temporal windows as logistical basis for cognitive processing”Advances in Psychological Science19775–793
25.
ProulxTHeineS JVohsK D, 2010“When is the unfamiliar the uncanny? Meaning affirmation after exposure to absurdist literature, humor, and art”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36817–829
26.
ReberRSchwartzNWinkelmanP, 2004“Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?”Personality and Social Psychology Review8364–382
27.
SchendanH ESternC E, 2008“Where vision meets memory: Prefrontal-posterior networks for visual object constancy during categorization and recognition”Cerebral Cortex181695–1711
28.
SchmidtK ELomberS GPayneB RGaluskeR A, 2011“Pattern motion representation in primary visual cortex is mediated by transcortical feedback”NeuroImage54474–484
29.
SestieriCShulmanG LCorbettaM, 2010“Attention to memory and the environment: Functional specialization and dynamic competition in human posterior parietal cortex”Journal of Neuroscience308445–8456
30.
SpelkeE S, 1994“Initial knowledge. Six suggestions”Cognition50443–447
31.
StegerM FKashadanT BSullivanB ALorentzD, 2008“Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning”Journal of Personality76199–228
32.
TalairachJTournouxP, 1988Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag)
33.
TanidaKPöppelE, 2006“A hierarchical model of operational anticipation windows in driving an automobile”Cognitive Processing837–44
34.
TeuberH-L, 1960Perception. Handbook of Physiology—Neurophysiology III (Heidelberg: Springer) pp 1595–1668
35.
Tzourio-MazoyerNLandeauBPapathanassiouDCrivelloFEtardODelcroixNMazoyerBJoliotM, 2002“Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain”NeuroImage15273–289
36.
WinstonA SCupchikG C, 1992“The evaluation of high art and popular art by naïve and experienced viewers”Visual Arts Research181–14
37.
ZekiS, 1999Inner Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
38.
ZhouBBaoYSanderTTrahmsLPöppelE, 2010“Dissociation of summation and peak latencies in visual processing: An MEG study on stimulus eccentricity”Neuroscience Letters483101–104
