Amodal completion occurs when a portion of an object is hidden as a result of its occlusion behind another object. Under these conditions, the object perceived as occluded is seen as a unitary shape, whose boundary contours amodally complete behind the overlapping modal object. Kanizsa (1972, Studia Psychologica 14 208–210) and his collaborators demonstrated some effects related to the amodal completion: shrinkage of the whole figure partially occluded; expansion of the modally visible portions of the same figure; shape deformations against the Gestalt principles of regularity, simplicity, symmetry, and past experience; global increasing of colour quantity of the partially occluded figure. The aim of this work is to demonstrate that the amodal completion is not a necessary factor in inducing the previous effects. This was accomplished through phenomenological experiments whose stimuli were crucial instances (counterexamples) disproving the amodal completion hypothesis and proving the role played by the directional symmetry of the element components of each stimulus pattern. Some new phenomena demonstrated the main role of the directional shape organisation, considered as a principle of shape formation.
BoselieFWouterloodD, 1992“A good continuation model of some occlusion phenomena”Psychological Research54267–277
3.
BozziP, 1968–1969“Direzionalitá e organizzazione interna di una figura”Memorie della Accademia Patavina di SS.LL.AA., Classe di Scienze Morali, Lettere ed Arti, LXXXI. (See also: BozziP.1993Experimenta in Visu. Ricerche sulla Percezione (pages 133–163) (Milan: Guerini)
4.
BurmesterE, 1896“Beitrag zur experimentellen Bestimmung geometrisch-optischer Täuschungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane12355–394
5.
Da PosOZambianchiE, 1996Visual Illusions and Effects (Milan: Guerini)
6.
GerbinoW, 1978“Some observations on the formation of angles in amodal completion”Italian Journal of Psychology588–100
7.
GerbinoW, 1979“Il ruolo della forma nelle modificazioni grandezza dovute a completamento amodale”, Reports from the Institute of Psychology, University of Trieste, Italy
8.
GilbertC D, 1995“Dynamic properties of adult visual cortex”, in The Cognitive Neuroscience Ed. GazzanigaM S, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 73–90
9.
von HelmholtzH, 1866Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (Part III) (Leipzig: Voss)
10.
KanizsaG, 1969“Perception, past experience and the impossible experiment”Acta Psychologica3166–96
11.
KanizsaG, 1972“Schrumpfung von visuellen Feldern bei amodaler Ergänzung”Studia Psychologica14208–210
12.
KanizsaG, 1975“Amodal completion and phenomenal shrinkage of surfaces in the visual field”Italian Journal of Psychology2187–195
13.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger)
14.
KanizsaG, 1980La Grammatica del Vedere (Bologna: Il Mulino)
15.
KanizsaG, 1991Vedere e Pensare (Bologna: Il Mulino)
16.
KanizsaGGerbinoW, 1981“Il completamento amodale tra vedere e pensare”Giornale Italiano di Psicologia8279–307
17.
KanizsaGGerbinoW, 1982“Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking?”, in Organization and Representation in Perception Ed. BeckJ, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 167–190
18.
KanizsaGLuccioR, 1978“Espansione di superficie da completamento amodale”, Reports from the Institute of Psychology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
19.
KellmanP JShipleyT F, 1991“A theory of visual interpolation in object perception”Cognitive Psychology23141–221
20.
KomatsuH, 2006“The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in”Nature Reviews Neuroscience7220–231
21.
KristofW, 1961“Versuche mit der waagrechten Strecke-Punkt-Figur”Acta Psychologica1817–28
22.
KundtA, 1863“Untersuchungen über Augenmaß und optische Täuschungen”Annalen der Physik und Chemie120118–158
23.
LippsT, 1897Raumästhetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen (Leipzig: Barth)
24.
MachE, 1914/1959The Analysis of Sensation (Chicago, IL: Open Court)
25.
MetzgerW, 1963Psychologie (Darmstadt: Steinkopff)
26.
MichotteA, 1951“Une nouvelle énigme de la psychologie de la perception: Le «donné amodal» dans l'expérience sensorielle”, International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm
27.
MichotteABurkeL, 1951“Une nouvelle énigme de la psychologie de la perception: Le ‘donné amodal’ dans l'expérience sensorielle”, in Actes du XIII Congrés International de Psychologie, Stockholm. Reprinted in MichotteA, 1962Causalité, Permanence et Réalité Phénoménales (Louvain: Publications Universitaires) pp 372–373
28.
MichotteAThinesGCrabbéG, 1964“Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives”Studia PsychologicaLouvain, Publications Universitaires. Reprinted in Michotte 's Experimental Phenomenology of Perception Eds ThinèsGCostallAButterworthG, (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 1991
29.
MurakamiI, 2008“Perceptual filling-in”Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (Berlin: Springer)
30.
ObonaiT, 1954“Induction effects in estimates of extent”Journal of Experimental Psychology4757–60
31.
OppelJ J, 1854–1855“Über geometrisch-optische Täuschungen”Jahresbericht des Physikalischen Vereins zu Frankfurt am Main pp 37–47
32.
PalmerS E, 1999Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology (Cambridge MA: MIT Press)
33.
PetterG, 1956“Nuove ricerche sperimentali sulla totalizzazione percettiva”Rivista di Psicologia50213–227
34.
PinnaB, 2008“A new perceptual problem: The amodal completion of color”Visual Neuroscience25415–422
35.
PinnaB, 2010a“New Gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning”Gestalt Theory321–67
36.
PinnaB, 2010b“What comes before psychophysics? The problem of ‘what we perceive’ and the phenomenological exploration of new effects”Seeing & Perceiving23463–481
37.
PinnaB, 2011“What is the meaning of shape?”Gestalt Theory33383–422
38.
PinnaB, 2012“La percezione visiva: Domande, temi e obiettivi della scienza della visione”, in Psicologia dei Processi Cognitivi Eds JobRCubelliR, (Rome: Carocci Editore) pp 100–132
39.
PinnaBAlbertazziL, 2011“From grouping to visual meanings: A new theory of perceptual organization”, in Information in Perception Eds AlbertazziLvan TonderGVishwanathD, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 288–344
40.
PinnaBGrossbergS, 2006“Logic and phenomenology of incompleteness in illusory figures: New cases and hypotheses”Psychofenia993–135
41.
PinnaBSiriguL, 2011“The accentuation principle of visual organization and the illusion of musical suspension”Seeing & Perceiving24595–621
42.
SchumannF, 1900“Beiträge zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen. Zur Schätzung räumlicher Grössen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane241–33
43.
SekulerA BPalmerS EFlynnC, 1994“Local and global processes in visual completion”Psychological Science5260–267
44.
SinghM, 2004“Modal and amodal completion generate different shapes”Psychological Science15454–459
45.
Ts'oD YRoeA W, 1995“Functional compartments in visual cortex: Segregation and interaction”, in The Cognitive Neuroscience Ed. GazzanigaM S, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 325–337
46.
Van EssenD CDeYoeE A, 1995“Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex”, in The Cognitive Neuroscience Ed. GazzanigaM S, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 383–400
47.
VezzaniS, 1999“Shrinkage and expansion by amodal completion: A critical review”Perception28935–947
48.
Von der HeydtRPeterhansE, 1989“Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: I. Lines of pattern discontinuity”Journal of Neuroscience91731–1748
49.
ZanforlinM, 1981a“Perception of apparent width using adjacent surfaces: I. Amodal completion and surface shrinkage”, Report n. 31 dell'Istituto di Psicologia dell'Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
50.
ZanforlinM, 1981b“Perception of apparent width using adjacent surfaces: II:. Apparent shrinkage and expansion of adjacent (or striped) surfaces: An explanatory hypothesis”, Report n. 37 dell'Istituto di Psicologia dell'Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
