Abstract
Research suggests that ambiguous figure reversal is associated with creativity, but current evidence relies on subjective self-report that is difficult to quantify (Wiseman, Watt, Gilhooly, Georgiou, 2011 British Journal of Psychology
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Doherty
M J
Tsuji
H
Phillips
W A
, 2008 “The context-sensitivity of visual size perception varies across cultures” Perception 37 1426 –1433
2.
Guilford
J P
Christensen
P R
Merrifield
P R
Wilson
R C
, 1978 Alternate Uses: Manual of Instructions and Interpretations (Orange, CA : Sheridan Psychological Services )
3.
Long
G M
Toppino
T C
, 2004 “Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures” Psychological Bulletin 130 748 –768
4.
Phillips
W A
Chapman
K L S
Berry
P D
, 2004 “Size perception is less context-sensitive in males” Perception 33 79 –86
5.
Wallach
M A
Kogan
N
, 1965 Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity– Intelligence Distinction (New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston )
6.
Wimmer
M C
Doherty
M J
, 2011 “The development of ambiguous figure perception” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 76 (1 ) 1 –130
7.
Wiseman
R
Watt
C
Gilhooly
K
Georgiou
G
, 2011 “Creativity and ease of ambiguous figure reversal” British Journal of Psychology 102 615 –622
