A mathematical measure of pattern complexity based on subsymmetries possessed by the pattern, previously shown to correlate highly with empirically derived measures of cognitive complexity in the visual domain, is found to also correlate significantly with empirically derived complexity measures of perception and production of auditory temporal and musical rhythmic patterns. Not only does the subsymmetry measure correlate highly with the difficulty of reproducing the rhythms by tapping after listening to them, but also the empirical measures exhibit similar behavior, for both the visual and auditory patterns, as a function of the relative number of subsymmetries present in the patterns.
AksentjevićAElliottM ABarberP J, 2001“Dynamics of perceptual grouping: Similarities in the organization of visual and auditory groups”Visual Cognition8349–358.
ChenC-CWuJ-HWuC-C, 2011“Reduction of image complexity explains aesthetic preference for symmetry”Symmetry3443–456.
4.
FitchW TRosenfeldA J, 2007“Perception and production of syncopated rhythms”Music Perception2543–58.
5.
GrahnJ A, 2012“See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms” Experimental Brain ResearchAksentjević22051–61.
6.
GuttmanS EGilroyL ABlakeR, 2005“Hearing what the eyes see: Auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences”Psychological Science16228–235.
7.
JokiniemiMRaisamoRLylykangasJSurakkaV, 2008“Crossmodal rhythm perception”, in Haptic and Audio Interactive Design: Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencevolume 5270, Eds PirhonenABrewsterS, (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp 111–119.
8.
KubovyMVan ValkenburgD, 2001“Auditory and visual objects”Cognition8097–126.
9.
Longuet-HigginsH CLeeC S, 1984“The rhythmic interpretation of monophonic music”Music Perception1424–441.
10.
McAuleyJ DHenryM J, 2010“Modality effects in rhythm processing: Auditory encoding of visual rhythms is neither obligatory nor automatic”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics721377–1389.
11.
PatelA D, 2008Music, Language, and the Brain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12.
PatelA DIversenJ RChenYReppB H, 2005“The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat”Experimental Brain Research163226–238.
13.
PittsWMcCullochW S, 1947“How we know universals: The perception of auditory and visual forms”Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics9127–147.
14.
RoyerF LGarnerW R, 1966“Response uncertainty and perceptual difficulty of auditory temporal patterns”Perception & Psychophysics141–47.
15.
SmithD VDavisBNiuKHealyE WBonilhaLFridrikssonJMorganP SRordenC, 2010“Spatial attention evokes similar activation patterns for visual and auditory stimuli”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22347–361.
16.
SpenceC, 2011“Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review”Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics73971–995.
17.
ToussaintG T, 2012“The pairwise variability index as a tool in musical rhythm analysis”, in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) and 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM)Thessaloniki, Greece, 23–28 July, Eds CambouropoulosETsougrasCMavromatisPPastiadisK, (ICMPC-ESCOM) pp 1001–1008, http://icmpc-escom2012.web.auth.gr/sites/default/files/papers/1001_Proc.pdf.
