We report two experiments, based on a novel variant of the Rubber Hand Illusion (RHI), in which tactile stimulation is referred to an artificial (out-of-body) tongue. In the experiments reported here the participant's tongue was stimulated while they looked at a mirrored dummy tongue. On average, the participants agreed with the statement that they felt as if they had been touched in the location where they saw the rubber tongue being touched (experiment 1), thus demonstrating visual capture. When the external tongue was illuminated with a laser pointer (experiment 2), a significant proportion of the participants reported feeling either tactile or thermal stimulation on their own tongue. These results therefore demonstrate that the multisensory integration of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive information that gives rise to the RHI can be extended to the tongue (a body part that is rarely seen directly).
AllmanJ. M. (2000). Evolving brains. New York: Scientific American Library.
2.
AltschulerE. L.RamachandranV. S. (2007). A simple method to stand outside oneself. Perception, 36, 632–634.
3.
ArmelK. C.RamachandranV. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1499–1506.
DurginF. H.EvansL.DunphyN.KlostermannS.SimmonsK. (2007). Rubber hands feel the touch of light. Psychological Science, 18, 152–157.
6.
EhrssonH. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317(5841), 1048.
7.
EhrssonH. H.SpenceC.PassinghamR. E. (2004). That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305, 875–877.
8.
ErnstM. O.BanksM. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433.
LenggenhagerB.TadiT.MetzingerT.BlankeO. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317, 1096–1099.
11.
LimJ.JohnsonM. (2012). The role of congruency in retronasal odor referral to the mouth. Chemical Senses, 37, 515–521.
12.
MakinT. R.HolmesN. P.EhrssonH. H. (2008). On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research, 191, 1–10.
13.
MoseleyG. L.ArntzA. (2007). The context of a noxious stimulus affects the pain it evokes. Pain, 133, 64–71.
14.
MoseleyM. L. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience: Swapping bodies in the brain. Current Biology, 21, 583–585.
15.
PariseC. V.SpenceC.ErnstM. (2012). When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. Current Biology, 22, 46–49.
16.
PernegerT. V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316(7139):1236.
17.
RamachandranV. S.KrauseB.CaseL. K. (2011). The phantom head. Perception, 40, 367–370.
18.
RockI.VictorJ. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594–596.
19.
SessleB. J. (2006). Mechanisms of oral somatosensory and motor functions and their clinical correlates. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 33, 243–261.
20.
TastevinJ. (1937). En partant de l'expérience d'Aristote [Starting from Aristotle's experiment]. L'Encéphale, 1, 57–84, 140–158.
21.
TipperS. P.PhillipsN.DancerC.LloydD.HowardL. A.McGloneF. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 160–167.
22.
TsakirisM. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PLoS ONE, 3(12): e4040.
23.
TsakirisM.CarpenterL.JamesD.FotopoulouA. (2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 343–352.
24.
TsakirisM.HaggardP. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80–91.
25.
TsakirisM.HesseM. D.BoyC.HaggardP.FinkG. R. (2007). Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2235–2244.
26.
YoungJ. Z. (1968). Influence of the mouth on the evolution of the brain. In PersonP. (Ed.), Biology of the mouth: A symposium presented at the Washington meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 29–30 December 1966 (pp. 21–35). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
