Developmental Improvement and Age-Related Decline in Unfamiliar Face Matching

Abstract

Age-related changes have been documented widely in studies of face recognition and eyewitness identification. However, it is not clear whether these changes arise from general developmental differences in memory or occur specifically during the perceptual processing of faces. We report two experiments to track such perceptual changes using a 1-in-10 (experiment 1) and 1-in-1 (experiment 2) matching task for unfamiliar faces. Both experiments showed improvements in face matching during childhood and adult-like accuracy levels by adolescence. In addition, face-matching performance declined in adults of the age of 65 years. These findings indicate that developmental improvements and aging-related differences in face processing arise from changes in the perceptual encoding of faces. A clear face inversion effect was also present in all age groups. This indicates that those age-related changes in face matching reflect a quantitative effect, whereby typical face processes are engaged but do not operate at the best-possible level. These data suggest that part of the problem of eyewitness identification in children and elderly persons might reflect impairments in the perceptual processing of unfamiliar faces.

Keywords

face matching development aging individual differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Althoff

R. R.

Cohen

N. J.

(1999). Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 997–1010. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.997.

Aylward

E. H.

Park

J. E.

Field

K. M.

Parsons

A. C.

Richards

T. L.

Cramer

S. C.

Meltzoff

A. N.

(2005). Brain activation during face perception: Evidence of a developmental change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 308–319. doi:10.1162/0898929053124884.

Bäckman

(1991). Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 19 63–71. doi:10.3758/BF03198496.

Bartlett

J. C.

(1993). Limits on losses in face recognition. In Cerella

Rybash

Hoyer

Commons

M. L.

(Eds.), Adult information processing: Limits on loss (pp. 351–379). New York: Academic Press.

Bartlett

J. C.

Fulton

(1991). Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age. Memory & Cognition, 19 229–238. doi:10.3758/BF03211147.

Bartlett

J. C.

Memon

(2006). Eyewitness memory in young and older adults. In Lindsay

Ross

Read

Toglia

(Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bartlett

J. C.

Shastri

K. K.

Abdi

Neville-Smith

(2009). Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35 1207–1230. doi:10.1037/a0016368.

Bartlett

J. C.

Strater

Fulton

(1991). False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age. Memory & Cognition, 19 177–188. doi:10.3758/BF03197115.

Beal

C. R.

Schmitt

K. L.

Dekle

D. J.

(1995). Eyewitness identification of children: Effects of absolute judgements, nonverbal response options, and event encoding. Law & Human Behavior, 19 197–216. doi:10.1007/BF01499325.

10.

Behrmann

Avidan

(2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 180–187. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011.

11.

Benton

A. L.

(1980). The neuropsychology of facial recognition. The American Psychologist, 35 176–186.

12.

Benton

A. L.

Eslinger

P. J.

Damasio

A. R.

(1981). Normative observations on neuropsychological test performance in old age. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3 33–42. doi:10.1080/01688638108403111.

13.

Bindemann

Avetisyan

Rakow

(2012). Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18 277–291. doi:10.1037/a0029635.

14.

Bindemann

Brown

Koyas

Russ

(2012). Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001.

15.

Bindemann

Sandford

Gillatt

Avetisyan

Megreya

A. M.

(2012). Recognizing faces seen alone or with others: Why are two heads worse than one? Perception, 41 415–535. doi:10.1068/p6922.

16.

Bindemann

Scheepers

Burton

A. M.

(2009). Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9(2):7, 1–16. doi:10.1167/9.2.7.

17.

Boutet

Faubert

(2006). Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 34 854–864. doi:10.3758/BF03193432.

18.

Brewer

Keast

A. L.

Sauer

(2010). Children's eyewitness identification performance: Effects of a Not Sure response option and accuracy motivation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15 261–277. doi:10.1348/135532509X474822.

19.

Bruce

Henderson

Greenwood

Hancock

P. J. B.

Burton

A. M.

Miller

(1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5 339–360. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339.

20.

Burton

A. M.

White

McNeill

(2010). The Glasgow Face Matching Test. Behavior Research Methods, 42 286–291. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.286.

21.

Caldara

Schyns

Mayer

Smith

M. L.

Gosselin

Rossion

(2005). Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 1652–1666. doi:10.1162/089892905774597254.

22.

Carey

Diamond

Woods

(1980). Development of face recognition: A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16 257–269.

23.

Chaby

Jemel

George

Renault

Fiori

(2001). An ERP study of famous face incongruity detection in middle age. Brain and Cognition, 45 357–377. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1272.

24.

Chance

J. E.

Goldstein

A. G.

(1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40 69–85. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01094.x.

25.

Chung

Thomson

D. M.

(1995). Development of face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 86 55–87.

26.

Crookes

McKone

(2009). Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 11 219–247. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004.

27.

Daniel

Bentin

(2012). Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence. Neurobiology of Aging, 33 206.e1–206.e28. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001.

28.

Darling

Martin

Hellmann

J. H.

Memon

(2009). Some witnesses are better than others. Personality and Individual Differences, 47 369–373. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.010.

29.

de Gelder

Rouw

(2000). Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 38 1271–1279. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00039-7.

30.

de Heering

Rossion

Maurer

(2012). Developmental changes in face recognition during childhood: Evidence from upright and inverted faces. Cognitive Development, 27 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.07.001.

31.

Duchaine

Yovel

Butterworth

E. J.

Nakayama

(2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23 714–747. doi:10.1080/02643290500441296.

32.

Edmonds

E. C.

Glisky

E. L.

Bartlett

J. C.

Rapcsak

S. Z.

(2012). Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27 54–60. doi:10.1037/a0024582.

33.

Ellis

H. D.

Flin

R. H.

(1990). Encoding and storage effects in seven-year-olds' and ten-year-olds' memory for faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8 77–92. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00823.x.

34.

Farah

M. J.

Wilson

K. D.

Drain

H. M.

Tanaka

J. R.

(1995). The inverted faces inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research, 35 2089–2093. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00273-O.

35.

Freire

Lee

(2001). Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: Processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80 347–371. doi:10.1006/jecp.2001.2639.

36.

Geiselman

R. E.

Tubridy

Blumkin

Schroppel

Turner

Yoakum

Young

(2001). Benton facial recognition test scores: Index of eyewitness accuracy. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19 77–88.

37.

Germine

L. T.

Duchaine

Nakayama

(2011). Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition, 118 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.002.

38.

Graf

Ohta

(Eds.). (2002). Lifespan development of human memory. London: MIT Press.

39.

Habak

Wilkinson

Wilson

H. R.

(2008). Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views. Vision Research, 48 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.007.

40.

Havard

(2014). Are children less reliable at making visual identifications than adults? A review. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20 372–388. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.793334.

41.

Havard

Memon

Clifford

Gabbert

(2010). A comparison of video and static photo lineups with child and adolescent witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24 1209–1221. doi:10.1002/acp.1645.

42.

Henderson

J. M.

Williams

C. C.

Falk

R. J.

(2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory & Cognition, 33 98–106. doi:10.3758/BF03195300.

43.

Hosch

(1994). Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. In Ross

D. F.

Read

J. D.

Toglia

M. P.

(Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 328–347). New York: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Konar

Bennett

P. J.

Sekuler

A. B.

(2010). Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy. Psychological Science, 21 38–43. doi:10.1177/0956797609356508.

45.

Lamont

A. C.

Stewart-Williams

Podd

(2005). Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load. Memory & Cognition, 33 1017–1024. doi:10.3758/BF03193209.

46.

Lindsay

R. C. L.

Pozzulo

J. D.

Craig

Lee

Corber

(1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law & Human Behavior, 21 391–404. doi:10.1023/A:1024807202926.

47.

Macrae

C. N.

Lewis

H. L.

(2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13 194–196. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00436.

48.

McKone

Crookes

Kanwisher

(2009). The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in humans. In Gazzaniga

M. S.

(Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 467–482). Cambridge: MIT Press.

49.

Megreya

A. M.

Bindemann

(2013). Individual differences in personality and face identification. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 30–37. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.739153.

50.

Megreya

A. M.

Bindemann

Havard

Burton

A. M.

(2012). Identity-lineup location influences target selection: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27 167–178. doi:10.1007/s11896-011-9098-7.

51.

Megreya

A. M.

Burton

A. M.

(2006a). Recognising faces seen alone or with others: When two heads are worse than one. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20 957–972. doi:10.1002/acp.1243.

52.

Megreya

A. M.

Burton

A. M.

(2006b). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34 865–876. doi:10.3758/BF03193433.

53.

Megreya

A. M.

Burton

A. M.

(2007). Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69 1175–1184. doi:10.3758/BF03193954.

54.

Megreya

A. M.

Burton

A. M.

(2008). Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14 364–372. doi:10.1037/a0013464.

55.

Megreya

A. M.

White

Burton

A. M.

(2011). The other race effect does not rely on memory: Evidence from a matching task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64 1473–1483. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.575228.

56.

Meinhardt-Injac

Persike

Meinhardt

(2014a). Holistic processing and reliance on global viewing strategies in older adults' face perception. Acta Psychologica, 151 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.001.

57.

Meinhardt-Injac

Persike

Meinhardt

(2014b). Development of visual systems for faces and objects: Further evidence for prolonged development of the face system. PLoS ONE, 9: e99942. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099942.

58.

Memon

Bartlett

J. C.

Rose

Gray

(2003). The aging eyewitness: The effects of face, age and delay upon younger and older observers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58 338–345.

59.

Metzger

M. M.

(2002). Stimulus load and age effects in face recognition: A comparison of children and adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 4 51–62.

60.

Mondloch

C. J.

Geldart

Maurer

Le Grand

(2003). Developmental changes in face processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86 67–84. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00102-4.

61.

Mondloch

C. J.

Le Grand

Maurer

(2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31 553–566. doi:10.1068/p3339.

62.

Moscovitch

Winocur

Behrmann

(1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 555–604. doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555.

63.

Perfect

T. J.

(2003). Local processing bias impairs lineup performance. Psychological Reports, 93 393–394. doi:10.2466/PR0.93.6.393-394.

64.

Pesce

Guidetti

Baldari

Tessitore

Capranica

(2005). Effects of aging on visual attentional processing. Gerontology, 51 266–276. doi:10.1159/000085123.

65.

Pezdek

Blandon-Gitlin

Moore

(2003). Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 760–763. doi:10.1037/00219010.88.4.760.

66.

Picozzi

Cassia

V. M.

Turati

Vescovo

(2009). The effect of inversion on 3- to 5-year-olds' recognition of face and nonface visual objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102 487–502. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.11.001.

67.

Podd

(1990). The effects of memory load and delay on face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4 47–60. doi:10.1002/acp.2350040105.

68.

Pozzulo

J. D.

Balfour

(2006). Children's and adults' eye witness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination line up procedures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11 25–34. doi:10.1348/135532505X52626.

69.

Pozzulo

J. D.

Lindsay

(1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22 549–570. doi:10.1023/A:1025739514042.

70.

Pozzulo

J. D.

Lindsay

(1999). Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 167–176. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.167.

71.

Rhodes

M. G.

Castel

A. D.

Jacoby

L. L.

(2008). Associative recognition of face pairs by younger and older adults: The role of familiarity-based processing. Psychology and Aging, 23 239–249. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.239.

72.

Roux

Ceccaldi

(2001). Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing? Brain and Cognition, 46 383–396. doi:10.1006/brcg.2001.1296.

73.

Sangrigoli

de Schonen

(2004). The effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Developmental Science, 7 74–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00324.x.

74.

Scherf

K. S.

Behrmann

Humphreys

Luna

(2007). Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. Developmental Science, 10 F15–F30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00595.x.

75.

Schwarzer

(2000). Development of face processing: The effect of face inversion. Child Development, 71 391–401. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00152.

76.

Searcy

J. H.

Bartlett

J. C.

Memon

(1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing rates on face recognition and eyewitness identification tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27 538–552. doi:10.3758/BF03211547.

77.

Searcy

J. H.

Bartlett

J. C.

Memon

Swanson

(2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 207–214. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.207.

78.

Shapiro

P. N.

Penrod

(1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100 139–156. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139.

79.

Slessor

Phillips

L. H.

Bull

(2008). Age-related declines in basic social perception: Evidence from tasks assessing eye-gaze processing. Psychology and Aging, 23 812–822. doi:10.1037/a0014348.

80.

Sullivan

Ruffman

Hutton

S. B.

(2007). Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62 53–60.

81.

Whitbourne

S. K.

Sliwinski

(2012). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook for adulthood and aging. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.