Theories of lightness, like theories of perception in general, can be categorized as high-level, low-level, and mid-level. However, I will argue that in practice there are only two categories: one-stage mid-level theories, and two-stage low-high theories. Low-level theories usually include a high-level component and high-level theories include a low-level component, the distinction being mainly one of emphasis. Two-stage theories are the modern incarnation of the persistent sensation/perception dichotomy according to which an early experience of raw sensations, faithful to the proximal stimulus, is followed by a process of cognitive interpretation, typically based on past experience. Like phlogiston or the ether, raw sensations seem like they must exist, but there is no clear evidence for them. Proximal stimulus matches are postperceptual, not read off an early sensory stage. Visual angle matches are achieved by a cognitive process of flattening the visual world. Likewise, brightness (luminance) matches depend on a cognitive process of flattening the illumination. Brightness is not the input to lightness; brightness is slower than lightness. Evidence for an early (< 200 ms) mosaic stage is shaky. As for cognitive influences on perception, the many claims tend to fall apart upon close inspection of the evidence. Much of the evidence for the current revival of the ‘new look’ is probably better explained by (1) a natural desire of (some) subjects to please the experimenter, and (2) the ease of intuiting an experimental hypothesis. High-level theories of lightness are overkill. The visual system does not need to know the amount of illumination, merely which surfaces share the same illumination. This leaves mid-level theories derived from the gestalt school. Here the debate seems to revolve around layer models and framework models. Layer models fit our visual experience of a pattern of illumination projected onto a pattern of reflectance, while framework models provide a better account of illusions and failures of constancy. Evidence for and against these approaches is reviewed.
AdelsonE. H.PentlandA. P. (1996). The perception of shading and reflectance. In KnillD.RichardsW. (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 409–423). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AndersonB.WhitbreadM.de SilvaC. (2014). Lightness, brightness, and anchoring. Journal of Vision, 14(9):7, 1–13.
3.
BarrowH. G.TenenbaumJ. (1978). Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from images. In HansonA. R.RisemanE. M. (Eds.), Computer vision systems (pp. 3–26). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
4.
BergströmS. S. (1977). Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 18180–186.
5.
BeritensG. (1914). El astigmatismo del Greco. Madrid: Librería de Fernando Fe.
6.
BhallaM.ProffittD. R. (1999). Visual–motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 251076–1096.
7.
BlakesleeB.McCourtM. E. (1999). A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction. Vision Research, 394361–4377.
8.
BlakesleeB.McCourtM. E. (2003). A multiscale spatial filtering account of brightness phenomena. In HarrisL.JenkinM. (Eds.), Levels of perception (pp. 47–72). New York: Springer.
9.
BlojM.RipamontiC.MithaK.HaukR.GreenwaldS.BrainardD. (2004). An equivalent illuminant model for the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness. Journal of Vision, 4(9):6, 735–746.
10.
BoyaciH.MaloneyL.HershS. (2003). The effect of perceived surface orientation on perceived surface albedo in binocularly viewed scenes. Journal of Vision, 3(8):2, 541–553.
11.
BrunerJ. S.GoodmanC. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 4233–44.
12.
BurkampW. (1923). Versuche über das Farbenwiedererkennen der Fische. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 55133–170.
13.
CornsweetT. N. (1970). Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press.
14.
DurginF. H.BairdJ. A.GreenburgM.RussellR.ShaughnessyK.WaymouthS. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16964–969.
15.
DurginF.De WaldD.LechichS.LiZ.OntiverosZ. (2011). Action and motivation: Measuring perception or strategies?Psychological Bulletin, 181077–1082.
16.
FirestoneC.SchollB. (2014). “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science, 2538–46.
17.
FodorJ. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
GeierJ.BernáthL.HudákM.SéraL. (2008). Straightness as the main factor of the Hermann grid illusion. Perception, 37651–665.
19.
GeierJ.HudákM. (2011). Changing the Chevreul illusion by a background luminance ramp: Lateral inhibition fails at its traditional stronghold—a psychophysical refutation. PLoSONE, 13(6): e26062.
20.
GelbA. (1929). Die “Farbenkonstanz” der Sehdinge (The color of seen things). In von BetheW. A. (Ed.), Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie (Vol. 12, pp. 594–678). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21.
GilchristA. L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. Science, 195185–187.
22.
GilchristA. (1979). The perception of surface blacks and whites. Scientific American, 240112–123.
23.
GilchristA. L. (1980). When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?Perception & Psychophysics, 28527–538.
24.
GilchristA. (1988). Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: A common explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43415–424.
25.
GilchristA. (2006). Seeing black and white. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
GilchristA.DelmanS.JacobsenA. (1983). The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination. Perception & Psychophysics, 33425–436.
27.
GilchristA.KossyfidisC.BonatoF.AgostiniT.CataliottiJ.LiX.EconomouE. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106795–834.
28.
HansenT.OlkkonenK.WalterS.GegenfurtnerK. (2006). Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 91367–1368.
29.
HelmholtzH. (1924). Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. New York: Optical Society of America. (Original work published 1866).
30.
HeringE. (1964). Outlines of a theory of the light sense. (JamesonL. M. H. D., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1874).
31.
HolwayA.BoringE. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 289–94.
32.
HurvichL.JamesonD. (1966). The perception of brightness and darkness. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
IngleD. (1985). The goldfish as a retinex animal. Science, 227651–654.
34.
JohanssonG. (1977). Spatial constancy and motion in visual perception. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: John Wiley.
35.
KanizsaG. (1979). Organization in vision. New York: Praeger.
36.
KardosL. (1934). Ding und Schatten [Object and shadow]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 23. (Supplement).
37.
KatzD. (1930). Der Aufbau der Farbwelt. Leipzig.
38.
KatzD. (1935). The world of colour. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
39.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J.KappersA. M. (1994). On so-called paradoxical monocular stereoscopy. Perception, 23583–594.
40.
KöhlerW. (1913/1971). On unnoticed sensations and errors of judgment. In HenleM. (Ed.), The selected papers of Wolfgang Köhler. New York: Liveright. (Original work published 1913).
41.
KöhlerW. (1917). Die Farbe der Sehdinge beim Schimpansen und beim Haushuhn. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 77248–255.
42.
KozakiA. (1973). Perception of lightness and brightness of achromatic surface color and impression of illumination. Japanese Psychological Research, 15194–203.
43.
LiX.GilchristA. (1999). Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values. Perception & Psychophysics, 61771–785.
44.
MacLeodR. B. (1932). An experimental investigation of brightness constancy. Archives of Psychology, number 135, 5–102.
45.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (SmithC., Trans.). London: Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945).
46.
MooreC.BrownL. (2001). Preconstancy information can influence visual search: The case of lightness constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27178–194.
47.
NoguchiK.MasudaN. (1971). Brightness changes in a complex field with changing illumination: A re-examination of Jameson and Hurvich's study of brightness constancy. Japanese Psychological Research, 1360–69.
48.
PetterG. (1956). Nuove ricerche sperimentali sulla totalizzazione percettiva. Rivista di Psicologia, 50213–227.
49.
ProffittD. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1110–122.
50.
PylyshynZ. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22341–365.
51.
RauschenbergerR.PetersonM.MoscaF.BrunoN. (2004). Amodal completion in visual search: Preemption or context effects?Psychological Science, 15351–355.
RipamontiC.BlojM.HauckR.MithaK.GreenwaldS.MaloneyS.BrainardD. H. (2004). Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness. Journal of Vision, 4(9):7, 747–763.
54.
RockI. (1977). In defense of unconscious inference. In EpsteinW. (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes (pp. 321–373). New York: John Wiley.
55.
RossW.PessoaL. (2000). Lightness from contrast: A selective integration model. Perception & Psychophysics, 621160–1181.
56.
RunesonS. (1977). On the possibility of “smart” perceptual mechanisms. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 18172–179.
57.
SekulerA.PalmerS. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 12195–111.
58.
ShapiroA.LuZ. (2011). Relative brightness in natural images can be accounted for by removing blurry content. Psychological Science, 221452–1459.
59.
StefanucciJ.GeussM. (2009). Big people, little world: The body influences size perception. Perception, 381782–1795.
60.
StumpfC. (1906). Erscheinungen und psychische Funktionen. Abhandlungen der Königlich-Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, IV1–40.
61.
von KriesJ. (1904). Die Gesichtsempfindungen. Handbuch der Physiologie des Menchen, 3211.
62.
WallachH. (1976). On perception. New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co.
63.
WertheimerM. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 4301–350.
64.
YarbusA. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
