CapitaniELaiaconaMMahonBCaramazzaA, 2003“What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence”Cognitive Neuropsychology20213–261.
2.
CaramazzaASheltonJ R, 1998“Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate – inanimate distinction”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience101–34.
3.
CrutchS JWarringtonE K, 2003“The selective impairment of fruit and vegetable knowledge: A multiple processing channels account of fine-grain category specificity”Cognitive Neuropsychology20355–372.
4.
DavidoffJWarringtonE K, 1993“A dissociation of shape discrimination and figure – ground perception in a patient with normal acuity”Neuropsychologia3183–93.
5.
De RenziEScottiGSpinnlerH, 1969“Perceptual and associative disorders of visual recognition. Relationship to the side of the cerebral lesion”Neurology19634–642.
6.
De RenziESpinnlerH, 1967“Impaired performance on color tasks in patients with hemispheric damage”Cortex3194–216.
7.
GazzanigaM SBogenJ ESperryR W, 1962“Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commisures in man”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA481765–1769.
8.
HecaenHGoldblumM CMasureM CRamierA M, 1974“Une nouvelle observation d'agnosie d'objet. Déficit de l'association ou de la catégorisation, spécifique de la modalité visuelle?” [A new case of object agnosia. A deficit in association or categorisation specific for the visual modality]Neuropsychologia12447–464.
9.
HodgesJ RGrahamNPattersonK, 1995“Charting the progression in semantic dementia: Implications for the organisation of semantic memory”Memory3463–495.
10.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1984“Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A36385–415.
11.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1987“The fractionation of visual agnosia”, in Visual Object Processing: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach Eds HumphreysG WRiddochM J, (Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 281–306.
12.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1987To See or Not to See (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
13.
KartsounisL DWarringtonE K, 1991“Failure of object recognition due to a breakdown of figure – ground discrimination in a patient with normal acuity”Neuropsychologia29969–980.
14.
Lambon-RalphM AGrahamK SPattersonKHodgesJ R, 1999“Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia”Brain Language70309–335.
15.
LissauerH, 1890“Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben”Archiv für Psychiatrie21222–270.
16.
McCarthyR AWarringtonE K, 1986“Visual associative agnosia: A clinico-anatomical study of a single case”Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry491233–1240.
17.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman).
18.
SperryR WGazzanigaM SBogenJ E, 1969“Interhemispheric relationships: The neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemispheric disconnection”, in Handbook of Clinical Neurologyvolume 4, Eds VinkenP JBruynG W, (Amsterdam: Elsevier – North-Holland) pp 273–290.
19.
SutherlandN S, 1968“Outlines of a theory of pattern recognition in animals and man”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B171297–317.
20.
SutherlandN S, 1973“Object recognition”, in Handbook of Perceptionvolume 3, Eds CarteretteE CFriedmanM P, (London: Academic Press) pp 157–185.
21.
TenenbaumJ MBarrowH G, 1976“Experiments in interpretation-guided segmentation”Stanford Research Institute Technical Note 123.
22.
WarringtonE K, 1975“The selective impairment of semantic memory”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology27635–657.
23.
WarringtonE K, 1982“Neuropsychological studies of object recognition”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B29815–33.
24.
WarringtonE K, 1986“Visual deficits associated with occipital lobe lesions in man”Experimental Brain Research11Supplementum247–261.
25.
WarringtonE KMcCarthyR, 1983“Category specific access dysphasia”Brain106859–878.
26.
WarringtonE KMcCarthyR A, 1987“Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration”Brain1101273–1296.
27.
WarringtonE KMcCarthyR A, 1994“Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics”Neuropsychologia321465–1473.
28.
WarringtonE KCipolottiL, 1996“Word comprehension. The distinction between refractory and storage impairments”Brain119611–625.
29.
WarringtonE KJamesM, 1967“Disorders of visual perception in patients with localised cerebral lesions”Neuropsychologia5253–266.
30.
WarringtonE KJamesM, 1986“Visual object recognition in patients with right-hemisphere lesions: Axes or features?”Perception15355–366.
31.
WarringtonE KShalliceT, 1984“Category specific semantic impairments”Brain107829–854.
32.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1973“The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition”Cortex9152–164.
33.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1978“Two categorical stages of object recognition”Perception7695–705.
34.
BartramD J, 1976“Levels of coding in picture – picture comparison tasks”Memory & Cognition4593–602.
35.
BiedermanI, 1987“Recognition-by-components—a theory of human image understanding”Psychological Review94115–147.
36.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a 2-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64.
37.
DavidoffJWarringtonE K, 1999“The bare bones of object recognition: Implications from a case of object recognition impairment”Neuropsychologia37279–292.
38.
DavidoffJWarringtonE K, 2001“A particular difficulty in discriminating between mirror images”Neuropsychologia391022–1036.
39.
DickinsonS JBergevinRBiedermanIEklundhJ OMunck-FairwoodRJainA KPentlandA, 1997“Panel report: The potential of geons for generic 3-D object recognition”Image and Vision Computing15277–292.
40.
EllisRAllportD A, 1986“Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioral study”, in Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications Eds CohnA GThomasJ R, (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley) pp 245–247.
41.
HumphreysG WBruceV, 1987Visual Cognition (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
42.
KosslynS MChabrisC FMarsolekC JKoenigO, 1992“Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations—computational analyses and computer-simulations”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18562–577.
43.
KosslynS MKoenigOBarrettACaveC BackerTangJGabrieliJ D E, 1989“Evidence for two types of spatial representations hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15723–735.
44.
LawsonRHumphreysG W, 1996“View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22395–416.
45.
LissauerH, 1890“Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrag zur Theorie derselben”Archiv für Psychiatrie21222–270.
46.
LoweD G, 1987“The viewpoint consistency constraint”International Journal of Computer Vision157–72.
47.
MarrD, 1982Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman).
48.
MarsolekC J, 1999“Dissociable neural, subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition”Psychological Science10111–118.
49.
PoggioTEdelmanS, 1990“A network that learns to recognize 3-dimensional objects”Nature343263–266.
50.
PosnerM I, 1969“Abstraction and the process of recognition”, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Eds SpenceJ TBowerG, (New York: Academic Press) pp 43–100.
51.
PosnerM IKeeleS W, 1967“Decay of visual information from a single letter”Science158137–139.
52.
StankiewiczB JHummelJ E, 2002“Automatic priming for translation- and scale-invariant representations of object shape”Visual Cognition9719–739.
53.
StankiewiczB JHummelJ ECooperE E, 1998“The role of attention in priming for left – right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24732–744.
54.
TarrM JBülthoffH H, 1995“Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views—Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance211494–1505.
55.
TarrM JPinkerS, 1989“Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape-recognition”Cognitive Psychology21233–282.
56.
Thoma V, Davidoff J, in press “Priming of depth-rotated objects depends on attention and part changes” Experimental Psychology.
57.
ThomaVDavidoffJHummelJ E, 2005“Priming of plane-rotated objects depends on attention and view familiarity”Visual Cognition15179–210.
58.
ThomaVHummelJ EDavidoffJ, 2004“Evidence for holistic representation of ignored images and analytic representation of attended images”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30257–267.
59.
UllmanS, 1989“Aligning pictorial descriptions—an approach to object recognition”Cognition32193–254.
60.
WarringtonE KDavidoffJ, 2000“Failure at object identification improves mirror image matching”Neuropsychologia381229–1234.
61.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1978“Two categorical stages of object recognition”Perception7695–705.
62.
BiedermanIKalocsaiP, 1997“Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B3521203–1220.
63.
ColtheartM, 1978“Lexical access in simple reading tasks”, in Strategies of Information Processing Ed. UnderwoodG, (London: Academic Press) pp 151–216.
64.
ColtheartMPattersonKMarshallJ C, 1980Deep Dyslexia (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
65.
EdelmanSDuvdevani-BarS, 1997“A model of visual recognition and categorization”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B3521191–1202.
66.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, in press “Features, objects, action: The cognitive neurophysiology of visual object processing, 1984 – 2004”Cognitive Neuropsychology.
67.
MarrDNishiharaH-K, 1978“Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional structure”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B200269–294.
68.
TaylorA MWarringtonE K, 1973“Visual discrimination in patients with localized cerebral lesions”Cortex982–93.
69.
WarringtonE KRabinP, 1970“Perceptual matching in patients with cerebral lesions”Neuropsychologia8475–487.
70.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1973“The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition”Cortex9152–164.
71.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1978“Two categorical stages of object recognition”Perception7695–705.
72.
GaroffR JSlotnickS DSchacterD L, 2005“The neural origins of specific and general memory: The role of the fusiform cortex”Neuropsychologia43847–859.
73.
Grill-SpectorKKushnirTEdelmanSAvidanGItzchakYMalachR, 1999“Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex”Neuron24187–203.
74.
Grill-SpectorKMalachR, 2001“fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons”Acta Psychologica107293–321.
75.
Grill-SpectorKMalachR, 2004“The human visual cortex”Annual Review of Neuroscience27649–677.
76.
HumphreysG WRiddochM J, 1984“Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A36385–415.
77.
JamesT WHumphreyG KGatiJ SMenonR SGoodaleM A, 2002“Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams”Neuron35793–801.
78.
JamesT WCulhamJHumphreyG KMilnerA DGoodaleM A, 2003“Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: A fMRI study”Brain1262463–2475.
79.
KourtziZErbMGroddWBülthoffH H, 2003“Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex”Cerebral Cortex13911–920.
80.
LargeM EAldcroftAVilisT, 2007“Task-related laterality effects in the lateral occipital complex”Brain Research1128130–138.
81.
MilnerA DPerrettD IJohnstonR SBensonP JJordanT RHeeleyD WBettucciDMortaraFMutaniRTerazziEDavidsonD L W, 1991“Perception and action in visual form agnosia”Brain114405–428.
82.
PietriniPFureyM LRicciardiEGobbiniM IWuW HCohenLGuazzelliMHaxbyJ V, 2004“Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA1015658–5663.
83.
SimonsJ SKoutstaalWPrinceSWagnerA DSchacterD L, 2003“Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex”NeuroImage19613–626.
84.
VuilleumierPHensonR NDriverJDolanR J, 2002“Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming”Nature Neuroscience5491–499.
85.
WarringtonE KTaylorA M, 1978“Two categorical stages of object recognition”Perception7695–705.