In this study, water-based precursor solutions with citric acid as the chelating agent were prepared, and the effect of the pH of the precursor solutions on the morphology and microstructure of the Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) coating layer was investigated. A clear precursor solution was prepared and its colour changed depending on the pH of the solution, suggesting that citric acid effectively formed chelate complexes composed of Li, Al, Ti and P ions. The scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping analyses showed that a low pH resulted in a homogeneous LATP coating layer with a fine particle size and less dense morphology. When the pH value was increased, dense and enhanced surface coverage was obtained, whereas an inhomogeneous atomic distribution was confirmed in the LATP coating. The LATP-coated LiCoO2 (LCO) cathode exhibited enhanced specific capacity retention compared to that of the pristine LCO cathode.
KimS, OguchiH, ToyamaN, . A complex hydride lithium superionic conductor for high-energy-density all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Nat Comm. 2019;10(1):1081. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09061-9
2.
JungWD, KimJS, ChoiS, . Superionic halogen-rich Li-argyrodites using in situ nanocrystal nucleation and rapid crystal growth. Nano Lett. 2020;20(4):2303–2309. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04597
3.
ParkCH, LeeSS, KimKB, . Electrochemical properties of composite cathode using bimodal sized electrolyte for All-solid-state batteries. J Electrochem Soc. 2019;166(3):A5318–A5322. doi:10.1149/2.0481903jes
4.
XiL, ZhangD, XuX, . The interface engineering of all–solid–state batteries based on inorganic solid electrolytes. ChemSusChem. 2023: e202202158. doi:10.1002/cssc.202202158
5.
LinC, IssuesLS.Developments, and computation analyses of interfacial stability in all-solid-state Li batteries. JOM. 2022;74:4654–4663. doi:10.1007/s11837-022-05512-9
6.
LeeJS, ParkYJ.Comparison of LiTaO3 and LiNbO3 surface layers prepared by post- and precursor-based coating methods for Ni-rich cathodes of All-solid-state batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(32):38333–38345. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c10294
7.
WaltherF, StraussF, WuX.The working principle of a Li2CO3/LiNbO3 coating on NCM for thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries. Chem Mater. 2021;33(6):2110–2125. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04660
8.
WangY, LiuBN, ZhouG.Improved electrochemical performance of Li(Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2)O2 at high charging cut-off voltage with Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 surface coating. Chinese Phys B. 2019;28(6):068202. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/28/6/068202
9.
DengYF, ZhaoSX, XuYH, . Effect of temperature of Li2O–Al2O3–TiO2–P2O5 solid-state electrolyte coating process on the performance of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode materials. J Power Sources. 2015;296:261–267. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.017
10.
QiuJ, LiuX, ChenR, . Enabling stable cycling of 4.2 V high-voltage All-solid-state batteries with PEO-based solid electrolyte. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1909392. doi:10.1002/adfm.201909392
11.
NieK, WangX, QiuJ, . Increasing poly(ethylene oxide) stability to 4.5 V by surface coating of the cathode. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5(3):826–832. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02739
12.
KobylianskaS, DemchukD, KhomenkoV, . Surface modification of the LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode by a protective interface layer of Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3. J Electrochem Soc. 2019;166(10):A1920–A1925. doi:10.1149/2.0701908jes
13.
WangY, ZhangQ, XueZC, . An In situ formed surface coating layer enabling LiCoO2 with stable 4.6 V high-voltage cycle performances. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10(28):2001413. doi:10.1002/aenm.202001413
14.
ChoiJW, LeeJW.Improved electrochemical properties of Li(Ni0.6Mn0.2Co0.2)O2 by surface coating with Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3. J Power Sources. 2016;307:63–68. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.055
15.
KimMY, SongYW, LimJ, . LATP-coated NCM-811 for high-temperature operation of all-solid lithium battery. Mater Chem Phys. 2022;290:126644. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126644
16.
QuX, YuZ, RuanD, . Enhanced electrochemical performance of Ni-rich cathode materials with Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 coating. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2020;8(15):5819–5830. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05539
17.
YunJH, WonES, ShinHS, . Efficient and robust lithium metal electrodes enabled by synergistic surface activation–passivation of copper frameworks. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(40):23208–23215. doi:10.1039/C9TA08779F
18.
YuS, MertensA, GaoX.Influence of microstructure and AlPO4 secondary-phase on the ionic conductivity of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 solid-state electrolyte. Funct Mater Lett. 2016;9(5):1650066. doi:10.1142/S1793604716500661
19.
GunduzDC, SchierholzR, YuS, . Combined quantitative microscopy on the microstructure and phase evolution in Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 ceramics. J Adv Ceram. 2020;9(2):149–161. doi:10.1007/s40145-019-0354-0
20.
DavaasurenB, TietzF.Impact of sintering temperature on phase formation, microstructure, crystallinity and ionic conductivity of Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5(PO4)3. Solid State Ionics. 2019;338:144–152. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.016
21.
SomanS, IwaiY, KawamuraJ, . Crystalline phase content and ionic conductivity correlation in LATP glass–ceramic. J Solid State Electrochem. 2012;16:1761–1766. doi:10.1007/s10008-011-1592-4
22.
ZhangH, JiaX, YanY, . The effect of the concentration of citric acid and pH values on the preparation of MgAl2O4 ultrafine powder by citrate sol–gel process. Mater Res Bull. 2005;39:839–850.
23.
WiecinskaP.Thermal degradation of organic additives used in colloidal shaping of ceramics investigated by the coupled DTA/TG/MS analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:1419–1430. doi:10.1007/s10973-015-5075-1
24.
LinZ, LiuS, SunX, . The effects of citric acid on the synthesis and performance of silver–tin oxide electrical contact materials. J Alloys Compoun. 2014;588:30–35. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.222
25.
WuZ, ZhouW, JinW, . Effect of pH on synthesis and properties of perovskite oxide via a citrate process. AIChE J. 2006;52(2):769–776. doi:10.1002/aic.10664
