This paper contributes to the on-going debate over how government form affects spending. It broadens the previous focus on elected versus professional management to address the separation of legislative and executive powers. The empirical results reveal spending differences between governments with separation of powers and those with unified powers only for Southern counties of the US. In addition, for all regions and time-periods, professional or elected executive management does not significantly affect either municipal or county spending.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bingham, R.D. and Hedge, D. (1991) State and Local Government in a Changing Society . New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Blais, A. and Dion, S. (1991) The Budget-maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
3.
Booms, B.H. (1966) City government form and public expenditure levels , National Tax Journal, 19(2), pp. 187-199.
4.
Chang, C. and Turnbull, G.K. (2002) Bureaucratic behavior in the local public sector: a revealed preference approach, Public Choice (forthcoming).
5.
Deno, K.T. and Mehay, S.L. (1987) Municipal management structure and fiscal performance: do city managers make a difference?Southern Economic Journal , 53(3), pp. 627-672.
6.
Grosskopf, S. and Hayes, K. (1993) Local Public sector bureaucrats and their input choices, Journal of Urban Economics, 33(2), pp. 151-166.
7.
Hausman, J. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46, pp. 1251-1271.
8.
Hayes, K. and Chang. S. (1990) The relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council forms of government, Southern Economic Journal, 571), pp. 167-177.
9.
MacManus, S.A. (1996) County boards, partisanship, and elections, in: D. C. Menzel (Ed.) The American County, pp. 53-79. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
10.
Turnbull, G.K. (1995) Biased tax price or grant elasticities?, Economics Letters, 49, pp. 187-192.
11.
Turnbull, G.K. and Chang, C. (1998) The median voter according to GARP, Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), pp. 1001-1010.
12.
Turnbull, G.K. and Djoundourian, S.S. (1994) The median voter hypothesis: evidence from general purpose local governments, Public Choice , 81(3/4), pp. 223-240.
13.
Turnbull, G.K. and Mitias, P.M. (1999) The median voter model across levels of government , Public Choice, 99(1/2), pp. 119-138.
14.
Whitaker, G.P. and Jenne, K. (1995) Improving city managers' leadership, State and Local Government Review, 27(1), pp. 84-94.
