This article investigates the voluntary local organisations of the better-off classes in the Turkish urban context. Based on empirical research conducted with four neighbourhood associations (NAs), information is provided regarding their process of establishment, leadership, autonomy, goals and projects, resources and obstacles, which points to the significance of context. The research demonstrates that Turkish NAs differ from those in the West in terms of their commitment to ideological as much as pragmatic issues. In their response to the 'Islamist' versus 'secularist' polarisation in society, they seek to create their own localities as the places of secular and cosmopolitan people; and in their response to the increasingly unregulated and poorly serviced city, they struggle to create orderly localities protected from unlawful rent-seeking practices and equipped with adequate amenities. The NAs may be regarded as civic initiatives that empower the locality. Yet, by doing so, they may cause uneven development in urban space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aksoy, A. and Robins, K. (1994) Istanbul between civilization and discontent, New Perspectives on Turkey, 10, pp. 57—74.
2.
Bartu, A. (2001) Rethinking heritage politics in a global context: a view from Istanbul, in: N. Al Sayyad (Ed.) Hybrid Urbanism: On the Identity Discourse and the Built Environment , pp. 131— 155. Westport, CT: Praeger.
3.
Chen, S.C.Y. and Webster, C.J. (2005) Home-owners associations, collective action and the costs of private governance, Housing Studies, 20, pp. 205—220.
4.
Çinar, A.I. (1997) Refah party and the city administration of Istanbul: liberal Islam, local-ism and hybridity, New Perspectives on Turkey, 16, pp. 23—40.
5.
Danielson, M.N. and Keleş, R. (1985) The Politics of Rapid Urbanization . New York: Holmes & Meier .
6.
Davis, D.E. (2005) Cities in global context: a brief intellectual history, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , 29, pp. 92—109.
7.
Docherty, I., Goodlad, R. and Paddison, R. (2001) Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods, UrbanStudies, 38, pp. 2225—2250.
8.
Donnelly, G.P. and Majka, J.T. (1998) Residents' efforts at neighborhood stabilization: facing the challenges of inner-city neighborhoods, Sociological Forum, 13(2), pp. 189—213.
9.
Ebcim, N. (2005) Üç Dinin ve Ünlülerin Buluştuğu Semt: Kuzguncuk [The district where three religions and famous people meet: Kuzguncuk] . Istanbul: İleri.
10.
Erkip, F. (2000) Global transformations vs local dynamics in Istanbul , Cities, 17, pp. 371—377.
11.
Ferrell, J. (2001) Remapping the city: public identity, cultural space, and social justice, Contemporary Justice Review, 4, pp. 161—180.
12.
Fischer, R. (1984) Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America. Boston, MA: Twayne.
13.
Foley, P. and Martin, S. (2000) A new deal for the community? Public participation in regeneration and local service delivery, Policy and Politics , 28, pp. 479—491.
14.
Ilkuçan, A. (2004) Gentrification, community and consumption: constructing, conquering and contesting `the republic of Cihangir'. Unpublished MA thesis , Bilkent University, Ankara.
15.
Kadioğlu, A. (2005) Civil society, Islam and democracy in Turkey: a study of three Islamic non-governmental organizations, The Muslim World, 95, pp. 23—41.
16.
Keyder, Ç. (1999) The setting, in: Ç. Keyder (Ed.) Istanbul: Between the Global and the Local , pp. 3—31. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
Keyder, Ç. (2000) Liberalization from above and the future of the informal sector: land, shelter, and informality in the periphery, in: F. Tabak and M. A. Crichlow (Eds) Informalization: Process and Structure , pp. 119—132. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Kling, M.J. and Posner, S.P. (1990) Class and community in an era of urban transformation , in: M. J. Kling and S. P. Posner (Eds) Dilemmas of Activism , pp. 23—45. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
19.
Kocabiçak, E. (2003) Locating thirdspace in the specificities of the urban: a case study on Saturday mothers in Istiklal Street, Istanbul. Unpublished MA thesis, Middle EastTechnical University, Ankara.
20.
Lance, D. (2004) Neighborhood associations help shape policy in Juneau, Alaska, Nations Cities Weekly, 27(July), p. 5.
21.
Langbein, L. (2004) Efficiency, accountability, and private government: the impact of residential community associations on residential property values , Social Science Quarterly, 85, pp. 640—659.
22.
Lenk, K.M., Toomey, T.L., Wagenaar, A.C. ET AL. (2002) Can neighborhood associations be allies in health policy efforts?Political activity among neighborhood associations, Journal of Community Psychology, 30, pp. 57—68.
23.
Mağgönül, A.Z. (2005) `Seçkin' Semtin `Seçkin' Sakinleri: Teşvikiye-Nişantaşı [The `elite' residents of the `elite' district]. Istanbul : Kitabevi.
24.
Martin, G.D. (2003) `Place-framing' as place-making: constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, pp. 730—750.
25.
Martineau, W.H. (1976) Social participation and a sense of powerlessness among Blacks: a neighborhood analysis, The Sociological Quarterly , 17, pp. 27—41.
26.
Matejczyk, A.P. (2001) Why not NIMBY? Reputation, neighbourhood organisations and zoning boards in a US midwestern city, UrbanStudies, 38, pp. 507—518.
27.
Mills, A. (2006) Boundaries of the nation in the space of the urban: landscape and social memory in Istanbul, Cultural Geographies , 13, pp. 367—394.
28.
Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2002) Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Oakley, S. and Verity, F. (2003) Resisting urban entrepreneurialism: place-based politics in the production of collective identity, Urban Policy and Research, 21, pp. 191—203.
30.
Ohmer, M. and Beck, E. (2006) Citizen participation in neighborhood organizations in poor communities and its relationship to neighborhood and organizational collective efficacy, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 33, pp. 179—202.
31.
Öncü, A. (1988) The politics of the urban land market in Turkey: 1950—1980, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12, pp. 38—63.
32.
Portney, K.E. (1997) Mobilizing minority communities, American Behavioral Scientist, 40, pp. 632—645.
33.
Quane, J.M. and Rankin, B. (2006) Does it pay to participate? Neighborhood-based organizations and the social development of urban adolescents, Children and Youth Services Review, 28, pp. 1229—1250.
34.
Rich, C.R. (1980) A political-economy approach to the study of neighborhood organizations, American Journal of Political Science, 24, pp. 559—592.
35.
Sampson, J.R., Raudenbush, W.S. and Earls, F. (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy, Science, New Series, 277(5328), pp. 918—924.
36.
Sassen, S. (1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
37.
Selek, P. (2001) Maskeler, Süvariler ve Gacılar: Ülker Sokak, Bir Alt Kültürün Dışlanma Mekanı [The Ülker Street: the exclusion space of a subculture]. Istanbul: Aykırı.
38.
Şenol, F. (2004) Differences in the development of citizenship: residents' motivations and capacities for participating in neighborhood associations in Los Angeles. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of SouthCalifornia.
39.
Şimşek, S. (2004) The transformation of civil society in Turkey: from quantity to quality, TurkishStudies, 5, pp. 46—74.
40.
Smith, N. (2002) New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global strategy, Antipode, 34, pp. 427—450.
41.
Smith, R. (2006) Discerning differences in social capital: the significance of interpersonal network and neighborhood association structure on citizen participation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University.
42.
Swindell, D. (2000) Issue representation in neighborhood organizations: questing for democracy at the grassroots, Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, pp. 123—137.
43.
Vorhoff, K. (2000) Businessmen and their organizations: between industrial solidarity, cultural diversity, and the state, in: S. Yerasimos and G. Seufert (Eds) Civil Society in the Grip of Nationalism, pp. 188—189. Istanbul : Orient Institut and Institut Français d'Etudes Anatoliennes .
44.
Yip, N.M. and Forrest, R. (2002) Property owning democracies? Homeowner corporations in Hong Kong, Urban Studies, 17, pp. 703—720.
45.
Zukin, S. (1998) Urban lifestyles: diversity and standardisation in spaces of consumption, UrbanStudies, 35, pp. 825—839.
