The Conservative Government's 1988 Local Government Act extended compulsory tendering to a wide range of local authority services mainly supplied in the past by public departments in-house. This article reviews why the legislation was introduced; considers the evidence on efficiency savings from competitive tendering; details the services affected; and concludes by looking at the consequences for local government. Generally, there appears to be ample evidence to support the Government's claim that competitive tendering produces appreciable cost savings. Higher operating efficiency comes, however, from competition rather than 'privatisation'. The Act seems to be having a galvanising effect upon in-house suppliers who are reorganising and changing tneir 'culture' so as to compete effectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahlbrandt, R. (1973) Efficiency in the provision of fire services, Public Choice, 16, pp. 1-15.
2.
Ascher, K. (1987) The Politics of Privatisation: Contracting Out Public Services. London: Macmillan .
3.
Audit Commission (1984) Improving Vehicle Fleet Management in Local Government . London: HMSO.
4.
Audit Commission (1987) Competitiveness and contracting out of local authorities' services. Occasional Paper No. 3, Audit Commission, London.
5.
AuDrr Commission (1989) Preparing for compulsory competition. Occasional Paper No. 7, Audit Commission, London.
6.
Bennett, J.T. and Johnson, M.H. (1979) Public versus private provision of collective goods and services, garbage collection revisited, Public Choice , 34, pp. 55-63.
7.
Bish, R.L. and Warren, R. (1972) Scale and monopoly problems in urban government services, Urban Affairs Quarterly, September, pp. 97-122.
8.
Blankart, C.B. (1979) Bureaucratic problems in public choices: why do public goods still remain public?, in: K. W. Roskamp (Ed.) Public Finance and Public Choice. Paris: Cujas.
9.
Burnett, M. (1984) Privatisation: the Wands-worth experience, Accountancy, March, pp. 143-146.
10.
Coy.E.A. (1987) Dirty Business. Birmingham: West Midlands Low Pay Unit.
11.
Cubbin, J., Domberger, S. and Meadowcroft, S. (1987) Competitive tendering and refuse collection: identifying the sources of efficiency gains, Fiscal Studies, 8(3), pp. 49-58.
12.
Davis, E. (1984) Express coaching since 1980: liberalisation in practice, Fiscal Studies, 5(1), pp. 47-60.
13.
Department Of The Environment (1985) Competition in the Provision of Local Authority Services. London: Department of the Environment.
14.
Department Of The Environment (1988) Circular 19/88. London: Department of the Environment.
15.
Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S.A. and Thompson, D.J. (1986) Competitive tendering and efficiency: the case of refuse collection, Fiscal Studies, 7(4), pp. 69-87.
16.
Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S.A. and Thompson, D.J. (1987) The impact of competitive tendering on the costs of hospital domestic services, Fiscal Studies, 8(4), pp. 39-54.
17.
Dunsire, A., Hartley, K., Parker, D. and Dimitriou, B. (1988) Organizational status and performance: a conceptual framework for testing public choice theories, Public Administration , 66(4), pp. 365-387.
18.
Edwards, F.R. and Stevens, B.J. (1978) The provision of municipal sanitation services by private firms: an empirical analysis of the efficiency of alternative market structures and regulatory arrangements, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, pp. 133-147.
19.
Forsyth, M. (1980) Reservicing Britain. London : Adam Smith Institute.
20.
Gage, T. (1982) Cops Inc, Reason, 14(7), pp. 23-28.
21.
Hamada, K. and Aoki, S. (1983) 'Spinning off' in Japan: the upsurge in privatization, in: G. G. Wynne (Ed.) Cutback Management: A Trinational Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
22.
Hartley, K. (1984) Why contract out, in: Contracting Out in the Public Sector. London: RIPA.
23.
Hartley, K. (1986) Bureaucracy and power without responsibility, Economic Affairs, April/May, pp. 16-18.
24.
Hartley, K. (1988) Contracting-out: achievements and problems. Mimeo . University of York.
25.
Hartley, K. and Huby, M. (1985) Contracting-out in health and local authorities: prospects, progress and pitfalls, Public Money5(2), September, pp. 23-26.
26.
Hastings, S. and Levie, H. (Eds) (1983) Privatisation ?Nottingham: Spokesman.
27.
Hirsch, W.Z. (1965) Cost functions of the urban government service: refuse collection, Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, pp. 87-92.
28.
Kelliher, C. and McKenna, S. (1988) The employment implications of government policy: a case study of public sector catering, Employee Relations , 10(2), pp. 8-13.
29.
Kitchen, H.M. (1976) A statistical estimation of an operating cost function for municipal refuse collection, Public Finance Quarterly , 4, pp. 56-76.
30.
Kristensen, O.P. (1983) Public versus private provision of government services: the case of Danish fire protection services, UrbanStudies , 20, pp. 1-9.
31.
Marlin, J.T. (1982) Privatisation of Local Government Activities: Lessons from Japan. London: Aims of Industry .
32.
Mcdavid, J.C. (1985) The Canadian experience with privatizing residential solid waste collection services, Public Administration Review , 45, pp. 602-608.
33.
Millward, R. and Parker, D. (1983) Public and private enterprise: comparative behaviour and relative efficiency, in: R. MILLwARD, D. PARKER, L. ROSENTHAL, M. T. SUMNER and N. TOPHAM Public Sector Economics. London : Longman.
34.
Milne, R.G. (1987) Competitive tendering in the NHS: an economic analysis of the early implementation of HC(83)18, Public Administration , 65, pp. 145-160.
35.
Mitchell, W.C. (1988) Government as it is. Hobart Paper 109, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
36.
Oelert, W. (1976) Reprivatisierung des offentlichen Personalverkehers , Der Personenverkehr, 4.
37.
Orzechowski, W. (1977) Economic models of bureaucracy: survey, extensions and evidence, in: T. E. Borcherding (Ed.) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Source of Government Growth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
Parker, D. (1985) Is the private sector more efficient? A study in the public v. private debate, Public Administration Bulletin , August, pp. 2-23.
39.
Parker, D. (1989) Public control of natural monopoly in the UK: is regulation the answer, in: M. Campbell, M. Hardy and N. Healey (Eds) Controversy in Applied Economics. London: Harvester.
40.
Pier, W.J., Vernon, R.B. and Wicks, J.H. (1974) An empirical comparison of government and private production efficiency, National Tax Journal, 27, pp. 653-656.
41.
Pirie, M. (1985) Privatization. London: Adam Smith Institute.
42.
Pommerehne, W.M. and Frey, B.S. (1977) Public versus private production efficiency in Switzerland: a theoretical and empirical comparison, Urban Affairs Annual Review, 12, pp. 221-241.
43.
Primeaux, W.J. (1977) An assessment of X-efficiency gained through competition , Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, pp. 105-108.
44.
Roehm, S.H., Castellano, J.F. and Karns, D.A. (1989) Contracting services to the private sector: a survey of management practices, Government Finance Review, 5, pp. 21-52.
45.
Rogers, M. (1987) Some practicalities of contracting, Public Finance andAccountancy, 24, July, pp. 14-15.
46.
Savas, E.S. (1977) An empirical study of competition in municipal service delivery, Public Administration Review, November/December, pp. 717-724.
47.
Savas, E.S. (1979) Public vs private refuse collection: a critical review of the evidence, Journal of UrbanAnalysis, 6, pp. 1-13.
48.
Savas, E.S. (1987) Privatization: The Key to Better Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
49.
Scullard, R. (1989) Productivity in local government, Management Services, 33, pp. 38-41.
50.
Stevens, B.J. (1984) Delivering Municipal Services Efficiently: A Comparison of Municipal and Private Service Delivery. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
