German home-ownership rates are significantly lower than home-ownership rates in other nations. Perhaps attributable to several reasons, the ownership differential has become a major housing policy concern. This paper analyses the typical liquidity constraints for first-time home-buyers. It is well known that these constraints largely depend on the rate of inflation and result in credit rationing for investors whose income expectations are high but whose capital endowments are poor. Typically, this is the case for young families. Recently, German tax benefit schemes to promote home-ownership were rescheduled to avoid discrimination against young households. Still, the schemes place a high burden on public budgets. By contrast, the German Housing Policy commission proposed a scheme of home-ownership finance that combines private finance with a public pledge to overcome credit rationing. This paper examines the new proposal and its social, economic and fiscal implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Deutsch, E. and Tomann, H. (1995) Home ownership finance in Austria and Germany, Real Estate Economics, 23, pp. 441-474.
2.
Downs, A. (1985) The Revolution in Real Estate Finance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3.
Expertenkommission Wohnungspolitik (1995a) Wohnungspolitik auf dem Prüfstand. Report to the Federal Government. Tubingen: Mohr.
4.
Expertenkommission Wohnungspolitik (1995b) Wohnungspolitik ficr die neuen Lknder. Report to the Federal Government. Tubingen: Mohr.
5.
Guttentag, J., Hurst, E.G. and Redstone, A. (1991) Affordability and mortgage design: permanent buydowns and buyups, Housing Policy Debate, 2(4), pp. 1275-1288.
6.
Haffner, M. (1995) Housing expenses or costs: comparison of low-income tenants and owner occupiers in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Joint ENHRIEMF Seminar on Private Housing Finance in a Changing Environment, Brussels, 8-9 June.
7.
Hills, J., Hubert, F., Tomann, H. and White-Head, C. (1990) Shifting subsidy from bricks and mortar to people: experiences in Britain and West Germany, Housing Studies, 5(3), pp.147-167.
8.
Linnenman, P. and Wachter S. (1989) The impact of borrowing constraints on homeowner-ship , Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 17(4), pp. 389-401.
9.
McCulloch, J.H. (1986) Risk characteristics and underwriting standards for price level adjusted mortgages versus other mortgage instruments, Housing Finance Review, 5(2), pp. 65-97.
10.
Phillips, R.A. and Vanderhoff, J.H. (1994) Alternative mortgage instruments, qualification constraints and the demand for housing: an empirical analysis , Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 22, pp. 453-477.
11.
Tomann, H. (1992) Towards a housing market in eastern Germany, Housing Finance International, December, pp. 15-22.
12.
Yates, J. (1995) Homefund: the Australian experience of managing risk. Paper presented at the Joint ENHRIEMF Seminar on Private Housing Finance in a Changing Environment, Brussels, 8-9 June.
13.
Zorn P.M. (1993) The impact of mortgage qualification criteria on households' housing decisions: an empirical analysis using microeconomic data , Journal of Housing Economics, 3(1), pp. 51-75.
