Detecting Bimodality in the Analogical Reasoning Performance of Elementary Schoolchildren

Abstract

This paper reports on modelling six frequency distributions representing the analogical reasoning performance of four different samples of elementary schoolchildren. A two-component model outperformed a one-component model in all investigated data sets, discriminating accurate performers with high success probabilities and inaccurate performers with low success probabilities, whereas for two data sets a three-component model provided the best fit. In a treatment-control group data set, the treatment group comprised a larger proportion of accurate performers than the control group, whereas the success probabilities of the two latent classes were nearly identical in both groups. In a repeated-measures data set, both the success probabilities of the two latent classes and the proportion of accurate performers increased from the first to the second test session. The results provided a first indication of a transition in the development of analogical reasoning in elementary schoolchildren.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander, P.A. , Willson, V.L. , White, C.S. , & Fuqua, J.D. (1987). Analogical reasoning in young children . Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 401-408 .

Brown, A.L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer. What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 369-412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development. Birth to adulthood. London: Academic Press .

Crisafi, M.A. , & Brown, A.L. (1986). Analogical transfer in very young children: Combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal . Child Development, 57, 953-968 .

Everitt, B.S. , & Hand, D.J. (1981). Finite mixture distributions. London: Chapman & Hall .

Fischer, K.W. , Pipp, S.L. , & Bullock, D. (1984). Detecting developmental discontinuities. Methods and measurement. In R.N. Emde & R.J. Harmon (Eds.), Continuities and discontinuities in development (pp. 95-121). New York: Plenum .

Gilmore, R. (1981). Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. New York: Wiley .

Goldman, S.R. , Pellegrino, J.W. , Parseghian, P. , & Sallis, R. (1982). Developmental and individual differences in verbal analogical reasoning . Child Development, 53, 550-559 .

Goswami, U. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory . Child Development, 62, 1-22 .

10.

Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.

11.

Goswami, U. (1995). Transitive relational mappings in three- and four-year-olds: The analogy of Goldilocks and the three bears . Child Development, 66, 877-892 .

12.

Goswami, U. , & Brown, A.L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations . Cognition, 35, 69-95 .

13.

Halford G. (1993). Children’s understanding. The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

14.

Hosenfeld, B. , van den Boom, D.C. , & Resing, W.C.M. (submitted). Constructing geometric analogies for the longitudinal testing of elementary school children.

15.

Lohaus, A., Kessler, T., Thomas, H., & Gediga, G. (1994). Individuelle Unterschiede bei räumlichen Fähigkeiten im Kindesalter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 373-390.

16.

Mokken, R.J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis with applications in political research. The Hague: Mouton .

17.

Raven, J.C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: Lewis & Co.

18.

Russo, J.E. , Johnson, E.J. , & Stephens, D.L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols . Memory and Cognition, 17, 759-769 .

19.

Stern, H.S. , Arcus, D. , Kagan, J. , Rubin, D.B. , & Snidman, N. (1995). Using mixture models in temperament research . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 407-423 .

20.

Sternberg, R.J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning . Psychological Review, 84, 353-378 .

21.

Sternberg, R.J. , & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies . Child Development, 51, 27-38 .

22.

Sternberg, R.J. , & Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195-232 .

23.

Thomas, H. (1989). A binomial mixture model for classification performance: A commentary on Waxman, Chambers, Yntema, and Gelman (1989) . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 423-430 .

24.

Thomas, H. , & Lohaus, A. (1993). Modeling growth and individual differences in spatial tasks. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, (9, Serial No. 237).

25.

Thomas, H. , & Turner, G.F.W. (1991). Individual differences and development in water-level task performance . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 171-194 .

26.

Titterington, D.M. , Smith, A.F.M. , & Makov, U.E. (1985). Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. New York: Wiley .

27.

van der Maas, H.L.J. (in press). The dynamical and statistical properties of cognitive strategies: Relations between strategies, attractors, and latent classes. In K.M. Newell & P.C.M. Molenaar (Eds.), Dynamical systems in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

28.

van der Maas, H.L.J. , & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory . Psychological Review, 99, 395-417 .

29.

van der Maas, H.L.J., Walma van der Molen, J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1993). Discontinuity in conservation acquisition: a longitudinal experiment. In H.L.J. van der Maas, Catastrophe analysis of stagewise cognitive development. Model, methods and application. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.