Predictors of spelling errors in expository texts written by Hebrew-speaking elementary school children ( Predictores de errores ortográficos en textos expositivos escritos por alumnos de habla hebrea en escuela primaria )
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
Predictors of spelling errors in expository texts written by Hebrew-speaking elementary school children ( Predictores de errores ortográficos en textos expositivos escritos por alumnos de habla hebrea en escuela primaria )
Spelling errors are considered a paramount criterion in the evaluation of written texts. The present study aimed: (a) to describe the developmental path of spelling errors in expository texts written by Hebrew-speaking children from the second to fifth grades and (b) to reveal the predictive power of cognitive, linguistic and reading variables on spelling accuracy. To this end, each child wrote three expository texts and completed a battery of tasks. Spelling errors were identified and classified into various categories. Findings revealed a consistent decrease in spelling errors as age increased with a greater leap from the third grade on. Proficiency in reading fluency (as measured by rate and accuracy) and good reading comprehension skills significantly reduced the chance of producing spelling errors of any kind. Additional variables, such as lexical knowledge, also contributed to explaining the reduction of spelling errors in content Hebrew words. Our findings of mutual relations clearly support the connectionist and comprehensive approach to spelling that incorporates various linguistic and literacy dimensions in order to reach the goal of correct spelling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlamargotD.FayolM. (2009). Modelling the development of written transcription. In BeardR.MyhillD.NystrandM.RileyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing development (pp. 23–47). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n3
2.
AlvesR. A.BrancoM.CastroS. L.OliveT. (2012). Effects of handwriting skill: Output modes and gender on fourth-graders on pauses, language bursts, fluency and quality. In BerningerV. W. (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 389–402). Psychology Press.
3.
BabayiğitS.StainthorpR. (2011). Modeling the relationships between cognitive–linguistic skills and literacy skills: New insights from a transparent orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021671
4.
BahrR. H.SillimanE. R.BerningerV. W.DowM. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(6), 1587–1599. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092–4388(2012/10–0335
5.
Bar-KochvaI.AmielM. (2016). The relations between reading and spelling: an examination of subtypes of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(2), 219–234.
6.
BarKochvaI.NevoE. (2019). The relations of early phonological awareness, rapidnaming and speed of processing with the development of spelling and reading: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12242
7.
Bar-OnA. (2010). The role of linguistic knowledge in learning to read non-voweled Hebrew [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.
8.
Bar-OnA.KupermanV. (2019). Spelling errors respect morphology: a corpus study of Hebrew orthography. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1107–1128.
9.
Bar-OnA.RavidD. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguist, 32(3), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641100021X
10.
Ben- ZviA. G. (2010). Morpho-lexical development across the school years [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University. [in Hebrew]
11.
BermanR. A.RavidD. (1999). The oral/literate continuum: Developmental perspectives (Final Report submitted to the Israel Science Foundation). Tel Aviv University.
12.
BerningerV. W. (1999). Coordinating Transcription and Text Generation in Working Memory during Composing: Automatic and Constructive Processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269
13.
BerningerV.FayolM. (2008). Why spelling is important and how to teach it effectively. In D.G. Jamieson (Ed.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of language and literacy development (pp. 1–13). Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.
14.
BerningerV.VaughanK.AbbottR.BrooksA.BegayK.CurtinG.ByrdK.GrahamS. (2000). Language-based spelling instruction: Teaching children to make multiple connections between spoken and written words. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511141
15.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.SwansonH. L.LovittD.TrivediP.LinS. J. C.AmtmannD. (2010). Relationship of word-and sentence-level working memory to reading and writing in second, fourth, and sixth grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0002)
16.
BerningerV. W.GarciaN. P.AbbottR. D. (2009). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In TroiaG. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers (pp. 15–50). The Guilford Press.
17.
BerningerV. W.RichardsT. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. Academi.
18.
CaravolasM. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European Psychologist, 9(1), 3–14.
19.
DeaconS. H.ConradN.PactonS. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
20.
DekkerM. C.ZiermansT. B.SpruijtA. M.SwaabH. (2017). Cognitive, parent and teacher rating measures of executive functioning: Shared and unique influences on school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00048
21.
DesimoniM.ScalisiT. G.OrsoliniM. (2012). Predictive and concurrent relations between literacy skills in Grades 1 and 3: A longitudinal study of Italian children. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.002
22.
DockrellJ. E.ConnellyV. (2015). The role of oral language in underpinning the text generation difficulties in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(1), 18–34.
23.
DockrellJ. E.LindsayG.ConnellyV. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 427–446.
GarciaN. P.AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language and Literacy, 13(1), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.13.1.03
29.
GeorgiouG. K.HirvonenR.LiaoC.-H.ManolitsisG.ParrilaR.NurmiJ.-E. (2011). The role of achievement strategies on literacy acquisition across languages. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.001
30.
GillisS.RavidD. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A crosslinguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33(3), 621–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007434
31.
GlantzY. (1989). Mivxan Mem (test of abstract verbal intelligence). Bar Ilan University. [in Hebrew].
32.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.HebertM. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i4.6687
33.
GrahamS.SantangeloT. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9517-0
34.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In GreggL.SteinbergE. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
KimY. S.Al OtaibaS.WanzekJ.GatlinB. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037210
36.
LevinI.KoratO.AmsterdamerP. (1996). Emergent writing among Israeli kindergartners: Cross-linguistic commonalties and Hebrew specific issues. In RijlaarsdanG.Van-den BerghH.CouzijnM. (Eds.), Theory models and methodology: Current trends in research of writing (pp. 398–419). Amsterdam University Press.
37.
LevinI.RavidD.RapaportS. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28(3), 741–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000901004834
38.
LimpoT.AlvesR. A.ConnellyV. (2017). Examining the transcription-writing link: Effects of handwriting fluency and spelling accuracy on writing performance via planning and translating in middle grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.004
39.
McCarthyJ. H.HoganT. P.CattsH. W. (2012). Is weak oral language associated with poorspelling in school-age children with specific language impairment, dyslexia or both?Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(9), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.702185
40.
McCutchenD. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in text composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01464076
41.
McCutchenD. (2006). Cognitive factors in the development of children’s writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (p. 115–130). The Guilford Press.
42.
McCutchenD.StullS. (2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9524-1
43.
McCutchenD.StullS.HerreraB. L.LotasS.EvansS. (2014). Putting words to work: Effects of morphological instruction on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509969
44.
MillerP. (2004). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness?Reading and Writing, 17(6), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044299.63726.10
45.
MollK.RamusF.BartlingJ.BruderJ.KunzeS.NeuhoffN.LanderlK. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.003
46.
NunesT.BryantP. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. Routledge.
47.
OliveT. (2004). Working memory in writing: Empirical evidence from the dual-task technique. European Psychologist, 9(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.1.32
48.
OliveT. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4
PifarréM.FisherR. (2011). Breaking up the writing process: how wikis can support understanding the composition and revision strategies of young writers. Language and Education, 25(5), 451–466.
51.
PontartV.Bidet-IldeiC.LambertE.MorissetP.FlouretL.AlamargotD. (2013). Influence of handwriting skills during spelling in primary and lower secondary grades. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00818
52.
PuranikC. S.AlOtaibaS. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1523–1546.
53.
PurcellJ. J.TurkeltaubP. E.EdenG. F.RappB. (2011). Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00239
54.
RavidD. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing, 14(5/6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011192806656
55.
RavidD. (2005). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–363). Erlbaum.
56.
RavidD. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
57.
RavidD.Bar-OnA. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1802-5
58.
RavidD.KubiE. (2003). What is a spelling error? The discrepancy between perception and reality. Faits de Langues, 22, 87–98.
59.
RavidD.SchiffR. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19(8), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9004-3
60.
ReA. M.MirandolaC.EspositoS. S.CapodieciA. (2014). Spelling errors among children with ADHD symptoms: The role of working memory. Research in Developmental Dissabilities, 35(9), 2199–2204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.010
61.
SalasN.TolchinskyL. (2017). Hunting for the links between word level writing skills and text level quality. In SegersE.Van den BroekP. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven. John Benjamins.
62.
SavageR.PillayV.MelidonaS. (2008). Rapid serial naming is a unique predictor of spelling in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408315814
63.
SchaarsM. M.SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2017). Word decoding development during phonics instruction in children at risk for dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1556
64.
SeroussiB. (2011). The morphology-semantics interface in the mental lexicon: The case of Hebrew [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.
65.
Shahar-YamesD.ShareD. L. (2008). Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679817.2007.00359
66.
ShanyM.BahatA.LachmanD.ShalemZ.ZeigerT. (2006). Alef-Tav Examination for Diagnosis of Reading and Writing Processes According to National Norms:Theoretical and Practical Manual. Yesod Publication.
67.
ShanyM.Bar-OnA.KatzirT. (2012). Reading different orthographic structures in the shallow-pointed Hebrew script: A cross-grade study in elementary school. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1217–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9314-y
68.
ShanyM.ShareD. L. (2011). Subtypes of reading disability in a shallow orthography: A double dissociation between accuracy-disabled and rate-disabled readers of Hebrew. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0047-4
69.
SmytheI.EverattJ.Al-MenayeN.HeX.CapelliniS.GyarmathyE.SiegelL. S. (2008). Predictors of word-level literacy amongst grade 3 children in five diverse languages. Dyslexia, 14(3), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.369
70.
StavansA.SeroussiB.RigbiA.Zadunaisky-EhrlichS. (2020). The contribution of reading abilities to the writing quality of expository text structure in Hebrew-speaking elementary school children. In AlvesR.LimpoT.JoshiM. (Eds.), Reading-writing connections (pp. 123–145). Springer.
71.
SumnerE.ConnellyV.BarnettA. L. (2016). The influence of spelling ability on vocabulary choices when writing for children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 293–304.
72.
SwansonH. L. (1996). Individual and age-related differences in children’s working memory. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197273
73.
SwansonH. L.BerningerV. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(2), 358–385.
74.
TolchinskyL.Castillo ColomC. (2016). Les percepcions de mestres i experts sobre la qualitat dels textos. LSC-Llengua, Societat I Comunicació, 14, 57–67. DOI:10.1344/LSC-2016.14.8
Vaknin-NusbaumV.SaridM.ShimronJ. (2016). Morphological awareness and reading in second and fifth grade: Evidence from Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9587-7
77.
WagnerR. K.PuranikC. S.FoormanB.FosterE.WilsonL. G.TschinkelE.KantorP. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
78.
WegenerS.WangH. C.de LissaP.RobidouxS.NationK.CastlesA. (2018). Children reading spoken words: interactions between vocabulary and orthographic expectancy. Developmental Science, 21(3), 1–9. doi: 10.1111/desc.12577
79.
WolfM.BowersP. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415
80.
WolfM.Katzir-CohenT. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–239.
