Transdisciplinary integration and its implementation in primary education through two STEAM projects ( La integración transdisciplinar y su aplicación en Educación Primaria a través de dos proyectos STEAM )
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2021
Transdisciplinary integration and its implementation in primary education through two STEAM projects ( La integración transdisciplinar y su aplicación en Educación Primaria a través de dos proyectos STEAM )
Curriculum integration from a STEAM transdisciplinary perspective represents a profound challenge. This study delves into a transdisciplinary approach to primary education and the role of the arts through two STEAM projects in a programme for gifted students in Madrid (Spain). Participants include 111 students from eight groups (11–12 years old), five teachers and four external professionals. The teachers fulfill the dual role of both teacher and researcher, using participant and non-participant observation, video recordings, interviews and classroom journals and questionnaires. All the findings have been triangulated and coded by means of Activity Theory, using Atlas.ti8 software and statistical analysis. The results show the significance of learning and the creation of meaningful experiences as being related to a high degree of motivation and satisfaction, and to the integration of diverse areas in a participatory process in which the arts play a disciplinary and integrating role. A transdisciplinary STEAM approach is presented that could be paradigmatic for the field of primary education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArósteguiJ. L. (2020). Implications of neoliberalism and knowledge economy for music education. Music Education Research, 22(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2019.1703923
2.
BautistaA.TanL. S.PonnusamyL. D.YauX. (2016). Curriculum integration in arts education: Connecting multiple art forms through the idea of ‘space’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1089940
3.
BurgerP.KamberR. (2003). Cognitive integration in transdisciplinary science. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 43–73. http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6329135
4.
BurnardP.Colucci-GrayL. (2020). Why science and art creativities matter. (Re- configuring STEAM for future-making education). Brill/Sense Publishers.
5.
ChalmersC.CarterM. L.CooperT.NasonR. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–43. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1
6.
ChapellK.HetheringtonL.KeeneH. R.WrenH.AlexopoulosA.Ben-HorinO.NikolopoulosK.RobberstadJ.SotiriouS.BognerF. X. (2019). Dialogue and materiality/embodiment in science|arts creative pedagogy: Their role and manifestation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.008
7.
ClappE. P.JimenezR. L. (2016). Implementing STEAM in maker-centered learning. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066
8.
Cochran-SmithM.LitleS. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
9.
Colucci-GrayL.BurnardP.GrayD.CookeC. (2019, May). A critical review of STEAM (Science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.398
10.
CostantinoT. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973
11.
ElliottJ. (2009). Building educational theory through action research. In NoffkeS. E.SomekhB. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 28–38). SAGE.
12.
EngeströmY. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngestromY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.
EtimJ. S. (Ed.). (2005). Curriculum integration K-12: Theory and practice. University Press of America.
15.
FrieseS. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7: User guide and reference. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
16.
GeX.IfenthalerD.SpectorJ. (2015). Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. Springer.
17.
HarrisA.de BruinL. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educationial Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2
18.
HenrkisenD.DeSchryverM.MishraP. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century transform and transcend: Synthesis as a trans-disciplinary approach to thinking and learning. TechTrends, 59(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0863-9
19.
HerroD.QuigleyC. (2016). STEAM enacted: A case study of a middle school teacher implementing STEAM instructional practices. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 35(4), 319–342. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
20.
Hirsch HadornG.Hoffmann-RiemH.Biber-KlemmS.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.JoyeD.PohlC.WiesmannU.ZempE. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer.
KhineM. S.AreepattamannilS. (2019). STEAM education: Theory and practice. Springer.
23.
KleinJ. T.Grossenbacher-MansuyW.HäberliR.BillA.ScholzR. W.WeltiM. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser Verlag.
24.
LoewenthalK. M.LewisC. A. (2018). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Psychology press.
NicolescuB. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: The hidden third, between the subject and the object. Human and Social Studies, 1(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10317-012-0002-5
27.
NiemiD.ValloneJ.VendlinskiT. (2006). The power of big ideas in mathematics education: Development and pilot testing of POWERSOURCE assessments (CSE Report 697). National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
28.
ParkJ.SonJ. (2010). Transitioning toward transdisciplinary learning in a multidisciplianary environment. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.6.1.82
29.
PerignatE.Katz-BuonincontroJ. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
30.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
31.
RiceP.EzzyD. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford University Press.
32.
Torres SantoméJ. (1994). Globalización e interdisciplinariedad: el currículum integrado. Ediciones Morata.
33.
WengerE. (2002). Comunidades de práctica. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.
