Despite the growth in research on the impact of school administration on educational improvement in the past 10 years, the characterization of the identity of school principals is a controversial, pending issue. In this study, we set out to undertake this characterization from a dialogic perspective by tracking four expert principals over the course of one academic year. Via a longitudinal design with multiple case studies, we analysed their repertoire of positions and their variations. The instruments included a reflective journal, interviews based on the self-confrontation method and a discussion group. Our results indicate not only that the principals share their positioning as promoters of learning and project managers when dealing with professional events but that dialogue among internal and external voices enables them to deal with the conflicts and tensions among positions constructively. We conclude that principals’ professional identity can be developed through conscious, strategic reflection on the positions they take within the context of their professional activity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkkermanS. F.MeijerP. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
2.
AkkermanS. F.BruiningT. (2016). Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448
3.
ArmstrongD.MitchellC. (2017). Shifting identities: Negotiating intersections of race and gender in Canadian administrative contexts. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(5), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217712721
4.
BadiaA.LiesaE. (2020). Experienced teachers’ identity based on their I-positions: An analysis in the Catalan context. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1795122
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
6.
BendiksonL.RobinsonV.HattieJ. (2012). Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 2012(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0387
7.
BushT. (2018). Preparation and induction for school principals: Global perspectives. Management in Education, 32(2), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618761805
8.
CastellóM.McAlpineL.Sala-BubaréA.InouyeK.SkakniI. (2021). What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education, 81(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00557-8
9.
ConnollyM.MiltonE.DaviesA. J.BarranceR. (2018). Turning heads: The impact of political reform on the professional role, identity and recruitment of head teachers in Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3450
10.
CrowG.DayC.MøllerJ. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1123299
11.
Cruz-GonzálezC.RodríguezC. L.SegoviaJ. D. (2020). A systematic review of principals’ leadership identity from 1993 to 2019. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 49(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896053
12.
EspunyM. T.CunhaR. S.CabralI.AlvesJ. M. (2020). Giving voice to problems faced by school leaders in Portugal. School Leadership and Management, 40(4), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1719400
13.
GaldamesS.MontecinosC.CamposF.AhumadaL.LeivaM. V. (2018). Novice principals in Chile mobilizing change for the first time: Challenges and opportunities associated with a school’s readiness for change. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 46(2), 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217707520
14.
Gómez-NúñezI.Cano-MuñozÁ.TorregrosaS. (2020). Manual para investigar en educación: Guía para orientadores y docentes indagadores (Vol. 225). Narcea Ediciones.
15.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D. (2018). Two Methodological Approaches to the Integration of Mixed Methods and Case Study Designs: A Systematic Review. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641
16.
HargreavesA. (2018). Foreword. In BrownC.PoortmanC. L. (Eds.), Networks for learning, effective collaboration for teacher school and system improvement (pp. xxi–xxii). Routledge.
17.
HermansH. J. M. (2001). The construction of a personal position repertoire: Method and practice. Culture and Psychology, 7(3), 323–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173005
18.
HermansH. J. M. (2015). Dialogical self in a complex world: The need for bridging theories. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i1.917
19.
HermansH. J. M. (2018). Society in the self. A theory of identity in democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190687793.001.0001
20.
JohnsonL. (2017). The lives and identities of UK black and South Asian head teachers: Metaphors of leadership. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(5), 842–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717279
21.
KelchtermansG.PiotL.BalletK. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals’ work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2010.545192
22.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2019). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
23.
LeónO. G.MonteroI. (2015). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. Las tradiciones cuantitativa y cualitativa (4a ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
24.
LingamG. I.LingamN. (2014). Leadership and management training for school heads: A milestone achievement for Fiji. International Studies in Educational Administration, 42(2), 1–17.
25.
MejierF.HermansH. J. M. (2018). The dialogical self-theory in education. In MeijersF.HermansH. (Eds.), The dialogical self-theory in education. Cultural psychology of education (Vol. 5, pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62861-5_7
26.
MonereoC. (2019). The role of critical incidents in the dialogical construction of teacher identity. Analysis of a professional transition case. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 20, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.002
27.
MonereoC.BadiaA. (2020). A dialogical self-approach to understanding teacher identity in times of educational innovations. Quaderns de Psicologia, 22(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1572
28.
MpungoseJ. (2010). Constructing principals’ professional identities through life stories: An exploration. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n4a387
29.
MurakamiE.TornsenM. (2017). Female secondary school principals: Equity in the development of professional identities. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(5), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717273
30.
NgS.SzetoS. Y. E. (2015). Preparing school leaders: The professional development needs of newly appointed principals. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 44(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214564766
31.
NordholmD.ArnqvistA.NihlforsE. (2020). Principals’ identity – Developing and validating an analysis instrument in the Swedish context. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1804621
32.
PradosM.CuberoM.SantamaríaA.AriasS. (2014). El yo docente en la universidad. Posiciones del yo y voces en la construcción narrativa de las identidades del profesorado universitario. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 36(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037013807532981
33.
RitaccoM.BolívarA. (2018). School principals in Spain: An unstable professional identity. International Journal Educational Leadership Management, 6(1), 18–39. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.17583/ijelm.2018.2110
34.
RiverosA.VerretC.WeiW. (2016). The translation of leadership standards into leadership practices: A qualitative analysis of the adoption of the Ontario leadership framework in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2015-0084
35.
RobertsonS. (2017). Transformation of professional identity in an experienced primary school principal: A New Zealand case study. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(5), 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217707519
36.
SolariM.RasskinI.MartínE. (2013). La investigación sobre la identidad profesional en contextos educativos: Una revisión bibliográfica. Eídos, 6, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.29019/eidos.v0i6.103
37.
SolariM. (2017). Humanizing school psychologists. The construction of a novice school psychologist’s model of professional identity / Humanizando a los orientadores educativos. El proceso de construcción del modelo de identidad profesional de una orientadora novel. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40(3), 467–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1341103
38.
VenturaA.-C. (2017). University professor identity in a classroom and interview situation / La identidad de profesores universitarios en situación de clase y de entrevista. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40(3), 531–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1341104
39.
WertschJ. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. Harvard University Press.
40.
YinR. K. (2012). Case study methods. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-009
