The influence of academic emotion on level of attention and relaxation in augmented reality learning: are boys consistent with girls? ( La influencia de la emoción académica en el nivel de atención y relajación en el aprendizaje mediante la realidad aumentada )
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2023
The influence of academic emotion on level of attention and relaxation in augmented reality learning: are boys consistent with girls? ( La influencia de la emoción académica en el nivel de atención y relajación en el aprendizaje mediante la realidad aumentada )
Based on AR learning software, this study investigated whether students with positive academic emotion and negative academic emotion maintained consistent levels of attention and relaxation. In Study 1, 98 primary school students were selected and tested with the SUS scale after completing an AR learning module. In Study 2, 45 primary school students were selected to participate in a two-factor between-subjects experimental design. The results showed that (1) AR learning software has good usability, (2) there was a significant difference in gender — in the AR learning environment, girls’ degree of relaxation was greater than that of boys, (3) in AR learning, the degree of attention and relaxation among students in the negative academic emotion group was higher than among those in the positive academic emotion group, but the difference did not reach a level of significance, which partly reflects the interest-based positive compensation trend of negative academic emotion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinleyM.CorriganM.RichardsonN. (2005). Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students’ reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.011
2.
AlbrechtU. V.Folta-SchoofsK.BehrendsM.Von JanU. (2013). Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: Randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), e182. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2497
3.
AndersonD. M.HaddadC. J. (2005). Gender, voice, and learning in online course environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i1.1799
4.
ArtinoA. R.JrJonesK. D.II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
5.
ArinoJ. J.JuanM. C.Gil-GómezJ. A.MolláR. (2014). A comparative study using an autostereoscopic display with augmented and virtual reality. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(6), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.815277
6.
ArvanitisT. N.PetrouA.KnightJ. F.SavasS.SotiriouS.GargalakosM.GialouriE. (2009). Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7
7.
ArvanitisT. N.WilliamsD. D.KnightJ. F.BaberC.GargalakosM.SotiriouS.BognerF. X. (2011). A human factors study of technology acceptance of a prototype mobile augmented reality system for science education. Advanced Science Letters, 4(11–12), 3342–3352. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.2044
8.
AshbyF. G.IsenA. M.TurkenA. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529
9.
AzumaR. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0143
10.
BangorA.KortumP.MillerJ. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.
11.
BrookeJ. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty’ usability. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(3), 4–7.
12.
BuchmannC.DiPreteT. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100401
13.
CaudellT. P.MizellD. W. (1992). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. Proceedings of 1992 IEEE Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, 2, 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317
14.
ChangS. C.HwangG. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007
15.
ChenG. P.JinY.HuangZ. Q.ZengX. Q.WangG. H.LiuS. (1998). The national norm designation report of “attention test for primary and middle school students”. Psychological Science, 21(5), 401–403. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.1998.05.005
16.
ChiangT. H.YangS. J.HwangG. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
17.
DalgarnoB. (2004, December5–8). A classification scheme for learner-computer interaction. In AtkinsonR.McBeathC.Jonas-DwyerD.PhillipsR. (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 240–248). Perth.
18.
DirinA.AlamäkiA.SuomalaJ. (2019). Gender differences in perceptions of conventional video, virtual reality and augmented reality. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(6), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.10487
19.
DongY.YuG. L. (2010). The influence of adolescents’ academic emotion on academic achievement. Psychological Science, 33(4), 934–937. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2010.04.024
20.
EfklidesA.VoletS. (2005). Emotional experiences during learning: Multiple, situated and dynamic. Learning & Instruction, 15(5), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.006
21.
EkremS.RecepC. (2016). Investigating the role of augmented reality technology in the language classroom. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(4), 1067–1085. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v18i4.1729
22.
FidanM.TuncelM. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635
23.
FogartyT. J.GoldwaterP. M. (2010). Beyond just desserts: The gendered nature of the connection between effort and achievement for accounting students. Journal of Accounting Education, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.09.001
24.
GarzónJ.BaldirisS.GutiérrezJ.PavónJ. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
25.
HuangC. (2018). Case study of educational applications based on wearable devices. Science and Technology Communication, 10(21), 90–91. https://doi.org/10.16607/j.cnki.1674-6708.2018.21.046
26.
IbiliE.BillinghurstM. (2019). Assessing the relationship between cognitive load and the usability of a mobile augmented reality tutorial system: A study of gender effects. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.594749
27.
JiangZ. W. (2012). Development of augmented reality educational games [Doctoral dissertation]. East China Normal University.
28.
JinY. W.WuJ. H. (2020). A preliminary study on game reading from the perspective of situational cognition. Library & Information, 3, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.11968/tsyqb.1003-6938.2020045
29.
LewisM. E.Haviland-JonesJ. M. E. (2010). Handbook of emotions. Contemporary Sociology, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2076468
30.
LiY. F.LiL. C. (2013). Research and development of children’s virtual interactive learning environment supported by augmented reality technology. Modern Educational Technology, 1, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1009-8097.2013.01.019
31.
LiuD. J. (2019). Research review on the reform of talents training in universities with artificial intelligence empowerment. Electronic Education Research, 40(11), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.11.015
32.
LiuY.ChaiX. Y.GongS. Y.SangB. (2017). Parents’ autonomous motivation to participate in homework and primary school students’ positive homework emotion: The role of students’ homework autonomous motivation and teacher support. Psychological Development and Education, 5, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.1001-4918.2017.05.08
33.
LuoY. J.HuangY. X.LiX. Y.LiX. B. (2006). Effects of emotion on cognitive processing: Series of event-related potentials study. Advances in Psychological Science, 14(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1671-3710.2006.04.005
34.
MarshH. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163048
35.
MeinhardtJ.PekrunR. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930244000039
36.
NiH. W.HuY. B. (2019). Can augmented reality promote learning? ——Based on a meta-analysis of 35 studies of international English-language journals from 2010 to 2018. Open Education Research, 25(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2019.01.007
37.
NøvikT. S.HervasA.DalsgaardS.Rodrigues PereiraR.LorenzoM. J. (2006). Influence of gender on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Europe–ADORE. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(1), i15–i24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-006-1003-z
38.
PekrunR. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
39.
PekrunR. (2017). Emotion and achievement during adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12237
40.
PekrunR.GoetzT.TitzW.PerryR. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
41.
PekrunR.LichtenfeldS.MarshH. W.MurayamaK.GoetzT. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12704
42.
PengJ. X.YangQ. W.LuoY. J. (2013). Selective attentional bias at different trait anxiety levels. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(10), 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01085
43.
PriceL. (2010). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00181.x
44.
PutwainD. W.SanderP.LarkinD. (2013). Using the 2×2 framework of achievement goals to predict achievement emotions and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.006
45.
RodaC.ThomasJ. (2006). Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.005
46.
SauroJ.LewisJ. R. (2014). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. China Machine Press.
47.
SauroJ. (2015). SUPR-Q: A comprehensive measure of the quality of the website user experience. Journal of Usability Studies, 10(2), 68–86.
48.
SchutzP. A.LanehartS. L. (2002). Emotion in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372545-5.X5000-X
49.
ŠmitM.BilošA.TurkáljD. (2021). Internet usage and related behavior patterns of primary school children: Perceived differences between girls and boys in Croatia. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 34(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.2.5
50.
SunF. P.ChenC. F. (2010). A study on the relationship between academic emotions and academic performance and its influencing factors. Psychological Science, 1, 204–206. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2010.01.046
51.
TanH. X.FangF.ZhouJ. H. (2022). Gender differences in online teaching satisfaction and continual use intention of college students. University Education Science, 1, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1672-0717.2022.01.06
52.
TurnerJ. E.SchallertD. L. (2001). Expectancy-value relationships of shame reactions and shame resiliency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.320
53.
VolchokE. (2018). Differences in the performance of male and female students in partially online courses at a community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1556134
54.
WangY. (2009). Questionnaire compilation and current situation research on primary school students’ academic emotion [Doctoral dissertation]. Shanghai Normal University. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.y1479326
55.
WolfeJ. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and classroom discourse: Communication patterns of Hispanic and white students in networked classrooms. Written Communication, 17(4), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017004003
56.
XingS. Y.GuH. Y. (2001). Research on the development of children’s gender roles. Journal of Teachers College of Shanxi University, 4, 82–84.
57.
XuX. C.GongS. Y. (2009). Academic mood and its influencing factors. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(1), 92–97.
58.
YaoD. W.ChenY. H.ZhaoY. Q. (2004). A study on age characteristics, development trends and gender differences of emotional abilities in children aged 3 to 5 years. Psychological Development and Education, 2, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1001-4918.2004.02.003
59.
YuC. B.LiQ.LiuY. (2017). Research status and development trend of augmented reality (AR) technology in education: based on literature analysis of Chinese and english journals from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Distance Education, 35(4), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2017.04.011
60.
YuG. L.DongY. (2005). Research on academic emotion and its implications for students’ development. Research in Education, (10), 41–45.
61.
ZhangL. C. (1996). A preliminary study on attentional stability of primary school students. Psychological Science, 19(4), 248–249. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.1996.04.016
62.
ZhangX. M. (2016). Research on the innovation of primary school mathematics teaching supported by information technology. China Educational Technology, 8, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.1006-9860.2016.08.019
63.
ZhaoS. Y.CaiT. S.ChenZ. J. (2012). The relationship between academic emotion and academic achievement of college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 398–400. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2012.03.006
64.
ZhaoX. J.KangX. R.LiX. P. (2022). The influence of learning mode and learning sharing behavior on the synchronicity of attention of sharers and learners. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00871-z
