The mechanical properties of the titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V, which vary with the specimen size under different temperatures, are studied through the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test and the quasi-static tensile test to determine the parameters for the classical Johnson-Cook (JC) constitutive model. Based on the dislocation pile-up theory, the classical JC constitutive model is modified by adding a grain strain term Δσ to consider the influence of grain size. The SHPB and tensile tests are analysed using a finite element method simulation. Compared with the experimental results, the simulation results based on the modified JC model exhibit a much higher calculation accuracy than that of the classical JC model.
SunY, ZengW, HanY, Determination of the influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy using an artificial neural network. Comp Mater Sci.2012;60:239–244. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.047
2.
BruschiS, PoggioS, QuadriniF, Workability of Ti–6Al–4V alloy at high temperatures and strain rates. Mater Lett. 2004;58:27–28, 3622–3629. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.058
3.
DeligianniD, KatsalaN, LadasS, Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials. 2001;22(11):1241–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00274-X
4.
LeeWS, LinCF. Plastic deformation and fracture behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy loaded with high strain rate under various temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;241(1–2):48–59. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00471-1
5.
HabibovicP, LiJ, VanCM, Biological performance of uncoated and octacalcium phosphate-coated Ti-6Al4V. Biomaterials. 2005;26(1):23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.026
6.
ThomsenP, LarssonC, EricsonLE. Structure of the interface between rabbit cortical bone and implants of gold, zirconium and titanium. J Mater Sci-Mater M. 1997;8(11):653–665. doi: 10.1023/A:1018579605426
7.
ChenHC, PinkertonAJ, LiL. Fibre laser welding of dissimilar alloys of Ti–6Al–4V and inconel 718 for aerospace applications. Adv Mater Technol. 2011;52(9):977–987.
8.
JafferySHI, KhanM, AliL, Statistical analysis of process parameters in micromachining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng. 2015;230(6):1405–1406.
9.
SunC, MaJ, YangY, Temperature and grain size dependent plastic instability and strain rate sensitivity of ultrafine grained austenitic Fe–14Cr–16Ni alloy. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct. 2014;597(8):415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.003
10.
DobroňP, ChmelíkF, YiS, Grain size effects on deformation twinning in an extruded magnesium alloy tested in compression. Scr Mater. 2011;65(5):424–427. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.027
11.
XueQ, LiiGTG. Development of adiabatic shear bands in annealed 316L stainless steel: part I. Correlation between evolving microstructure and mechanical behavior. Metall Mater Trans A. 2005;36(6):1471–1486. doi: 10.1007/s11661-005-0239-4
12.
MomeniA, AbbasiSM. Effect of hot working on flow behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy in single phase and two phase regions. Mater Design. 2010;31:3599–3604. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.060
13.
ZhaoQ, WuaGQ, ShaW. Deformation of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V under dynamic compression. Comp Mater Sci. 2010;50:516–526. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.09.014
14.
MandalS, SivaprasadPV, VenugopalS, Artificial neural network modeling of composition process property correlations in austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct. 2008;485:571–580. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.019
15.
GuptaAK, SinghSK, ReddyS, Prediction of flow stress in dynamic strain aging regime of austenitic stainless steel316 using artificial neural network. Mater Design. 2012;35:589–595. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.060
16.
ChengXL, ZhangH, BaiBZ, Investigation on high temperature compression behaviour of hydrogenated Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2011;27(10):1547–1550. doi: 10.1179/026708309X12584564052210
17.
DingJ, HallR, ByrneJ. Effects of stress ratio and temperature on fatigue crack growth in a Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2005;27(10–12):1551–1558. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.007
18.
UmbrelloD. Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;196(1–3):79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.007
19.
ZhaoJ, DingH, ZhaoW, Modelling of the hot deformation behaviour of a titanium alloy using constitutive equations and artificial neural network. Comp Mater Sci. 2014;92:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.040
20.
BazhenovVE. Influence of constitutional undercooling on grain refinement in titanium aluminide alloys. Mater Sci Technol. 2015;31(11):1305–1312. doi: 10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000690
21.
FidanS, AvcuE, KarakulakE, Effect of heat treatment on erosive wear behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29(9):1088–1094. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000239
22.
JafferySHI, KhanM, MativengaPT, Wear mechanism analysis in milling of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng.2013;227(8):1148–1156.
23.
YuanW, PanigrahiSK, SuJQ, Influence of grain size and texture on hall–petch relationship for a magnesium alloy. Scr Mater. 2011;65(11):994–997. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.028
24.
LiXF, JiBY, ZhouQ, Influence of grain size on electrically assisted tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Eng Perform. 2016;25(10):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.017
25.
LeeWS, LinCF. High-temperature deformation behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy evaluated by high strain-rate compression tests. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;75(1–3):127–136. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00302-6
