Hot deformation behaviour of Fe–21Cr–15Ni–Nb–V stainless steel was investigated by isothermal compression in the temperature range of 950–1150°C with a strain rate of 0.01–10 s−1. The results showed that complete recrystallisation occurred beyond 1050°C, resulting from the pinning effect of (Nb, V)(C, N). The nucleation of dynamic recrystallisation (DRX) was performed by the bulging, sub-grain swallowing and twinning mechanism. With increasing strain rate, new twinning was transformed into the Σ3 regeneration mechanism in the partial DRX region, while an opposite transformation was observed in the complete DRX region. In the partial recrystallisation region, grain rotation resulted in the formation of 110 orientation. In the complete recrystallisation region, the texture tended to distribute randomly at a high strain rate, and the grain growth was accompanied by the emergence of stable 100 orientation.
HanY, WuH, ZhangW, Constitutive equation and DRX behavior of as-cast 254SMO super-austenitic stainless steel. Mater Des. 2015;69:230–240. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.049
2.
MirzaeiA, Zarei-HanzakiA, HaghdadiN, Constitutive description of high temperature flow behavior of sanicro-28 super-austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;589:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.036
3.
HanY, LiuG, ZouD, Deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of as-cast 904L austenitic stainless steel during hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;565:342–350. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.043
4.
MaB, LiC, ZhengJ, Strain hardening behavior and deformation substructure of Fe–20/27Mn–4Al–0.3C non-magnetic steels. Mater Des. 2016;92:313–321. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.038
5.
ZambonA, FerroP, BonolloF.Microstructural, compositional and residual stress evaluation of CO2 laser welded superaustenitic AISI 904L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;424(1–2):117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.003
6.
PaggiA, AngellaG, DonniniR.Strain induced grain boundary migration effects on grain growth of an austenitic stainless steel during static and metadynamic recrystallization. Mater Charact. 2015;107:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.07.003
7.
WangS, ZhangM, WuH, Study on the DRX model and mechanism of nuclear grade 316LN austenitic stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2016;118:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.05.015
8.
StewartGR, ElwazriAM, YueS, Modelling of dynamic recrystallisation kinetics in austenitic stainless and hypereutectoid steels. Mater Sci Technol. 2013;22(5):519–524. doi: 10.1179/026708306X81478
9.
FrommertM, GottsteinG.Mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution during steady-state dynamic recrystallization in the austenitic steel 800H. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;506(1–2):101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.035
10.
CaoY, DiH.Research on the hot deformation behavior of a Fe–Ni–Cr alloy (800H) at temperatures above 1000°C. J Nucl Mater. 2015;465:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.014
11.
PradhanSK, MandalS, AthreyaCN, Influence of processing parameters on dynamic recrystallization and the associated annealing twin boundary evolution in a nickel base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;700:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.109
12.
SouzaRC, SilvaES, JorgeAM, Dynamic recovery andDRX competition on a Nb- and N-bearing austenitic stainless steel biomaterial: influence of strain rate and temperature. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;582:96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.037
13.
ChenY, LiJ, TangB, Texture evolution and dynamic recrystallization in a beta titanium alloy during hot-rolling process. J Alloys Compd. 2015;618:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.129
14.
CurtzeS, KuokkalaVT, OikariA, Thermodynamic modeling of the stacking fault energy of austenitic steels. Acta Mater. 2011;59:1068–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.037
15.
PoliaktEI, JonassJJ.A one-parameter approach to determining the critical conditions for the inition of dynamic recrystallization. Acta Mater. 1996;44(1):127–136. doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00146-7
16.
PoliaktEI, JonassJJ.Initiation ofDRX in constant strain rate hot deformation. ISIJ Int. 2003;43(5):684–691. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.684
17.
ParkJS, LeeYK.Determination of Nb(C,N) dissolution temperature by electrical resistivity measurement in a low-carbon microalloyed steel. Scr Mater. 2007;56:225–228. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.10.007
18.
Sarkari KhorramiM, MostafaeiMA, PouraliakbarH, Study on microstructure and mechanical characteristics of low-carbon steel and ferritic stainless steel joints. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;608:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.065
19.
NikulinI, KipelovaA, KaibyshevR.Effect of high-temperature exposure on the mechanical properties of 18Cr–8Ni–W–Nb–V–N stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;554:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.011
20.
MirzadehH, CabreraJM.A. najafizadeh, modeling and prediction of Hot deformation flow curves. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011;43(1):108–123. doi: 10.1007/s11661-011-0836-3
21.
ZhengY, ZengW, WangY, High strain rate compression behavior of a heavily stabilized beta titanium alloy: kink deformation and adiabatic shearing. J Alloys Compd. 2017;708:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.284
22.
GoetzRL, SemiatinSL.The adiabatic correction hactor for deformation heating during the uniaxial compression test. J Mater Eng Perform. 2001;10:710–717. doi: 10.1361/105994901770344593
23.
MatayaMC, BrownEL, RiendeauMP.Effect of hot working on structure and strength of type 304l austenitic stainless steel. Metall Trans A. 1990;21A:1969–1987. doi: 10.1007/BF02647245
24.
CaoY, DiH, ZhangJ, Dynamic behavior and microstructural evolution during moderate to high strain rate hot deformation of a Fe–Ni–Cr alloy (alloy 800H). J Nucl Mater. 2015;456:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.030
AkhianiH, NezakatM, SanayeiM, The effect of thermo-mechanical processing on grain boundary character distribution in incoloy 800H/HT. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;626:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.046
28.
BarrCM, VetterickGA, UnocicKA, Anisotropic radiation-induced segregation in 316L austenitic stainless steel with grain boundary character. Acta Mater. 2014;67:145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.060
29.
WangX, BrungerE, GottsteinG.The role of twinning during dynamic recrystallization in alloy 800H. Scr Mater. 2002;46:875–880. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00072-6
30.
ChenXM, LinYC, WuF.Ebsd study of grain growth behavior and annealing twin evolution after full recrystallization in a nickel-based superalloy. J Alloys Compd. 2017;724:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.027
31.
AkhianiH, NezakatM, SanayeiM, The effect of thermo-mechanical processing on grain boundary character distribution in incoloy 800H/HT. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;626:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.046
LeeDS, RyooHS, HwangSK.A grain boundary engineering approach to promote special boundaries in Pb-base alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;354(1–2):106–111. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00919-X
34.
Mark CaulF, RandleV.Grain-boundary plane crystallography and energy in austenitic steel. Scr Mater. 1996;35(7):831–836. doi: 10.1016/1359-6462(96)00234-5
35.
TsurekawaS, NakamichiS, WatanabeT.Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2006;54(13):3617–3626. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.048
36.
TsujiN.Presented at the J.J. Jonas symposium on thermomechanical processing, texture and formability of steel; 2000; Ottawa.
37.
Juul JensenD.Modelling of microstructure development during recrystallization. Scr Mater. 1992;27(1):1551–1556. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(92)90143-3
38.
PouraliakbarH, HamediM, KokabiAH, Designing of CK45 carbon steel and AISI 304 stainless steel dissimilar welds. Materials Research. 2014;17:106–114. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392013005000170
