Directional solidification experiments were carried out on peritectic steels to investigate the microstructure and volume shrinkage. A δ-dendritic structure developed intermittently and was enclosed by γ-austenite at growth rates of 15, 50, and 80 μm s−1. The primary dendritic spacing narrowed and the average spacing of dendrites decreased as the growth velocity increased. The functional relationship between the secondary dendrite arm spacing and cooling rates was established by statistical analysis. The influence of cooling rate on crack formation was analysed as a function of volume shrinkage. Reducing the cooling rate of the solidification delayed a massive type of peritectic transformation away from the ZST–ZDT brittle zone, thus reducing the probability of crack formation.
Li XZGuo JJLuo LSWell-aligned in situ composites in directionally solidified Fe–Ni peritectic system. Appl Phys Lett. 2006; 89(23):1–3.
2.
Luo LSSu YQGuo JJPeritectic reaction and its influences on the microstructures evolution during directional solidification of Fe–Ni alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2008; 461(1–2):121–127.
3.
Luo LSSu YQLi XZMicrostructure evolution during directional solidification of peritectic Fe–Ni alloy. Chin J Eng. 2006; 28(S1):79–81.
4.
Lo TSDoblerSPlappMTwo-phase microstructure selection in peritectic solidification: from island banding to coupled growth. Acta Mater. 2003; 51(3):599–611.
5.
UmedaTOkaneTKurzW.Phase selection during solidification of peritectic alloys. Acta Mater. 1996; 44(10):4209–4216.
6.
MazumderPTrivediR.Novel pattern forming process due to the coupling of convection and phase change. Phys Rev Lett. 2002; 88(23):235507.
7.
Liang JPGao YLLi RXPhase evolution of AISI 321 stainless steel during directional solidification. Ironmak Steelmak. 2009; 36(8):603–609.
Su YQLiuCLi XZMicrostructure selection during the directionally peritectic solidification of Ti–Al binary system. Intermetallics. 2005; 13(3–4):267–274.
12.
TrivediRPark JS.Dynamics of microstructure formation in the two-phase region of peritectic systems. J Crystal Growth. 2002; 235(1):572–588.
XiaGBernhardCIlieS.A study about the influence of carbon content in the steel on the casting behavior. Steel Res Int. 2011; 82(3):230–236.
15.
HechuKSlaterCSantillanaBA novel approach for interpreting the solidification behaviour of peritectic steels by combining CSLM and DSC. Mater Charact. 2017; 133:25–32.
16.
BilliaBJamgotchianHNguyen ThiH.Statistical analysis of the disorder of two-dimensional cellular arrays in directional solidification. Metall Trans A. 1991; 22(12):3041–3050.
17.
TewariSNWengYHDingGLCellular array morphology during directional solidification. Metall Trans A. 2002; 33(4):1229–1243.
18.
LiSMaBLuHMicrostructure and its scales of Cu-70% Sn peritectic alloy under high-temperature gradient directional solidification. Acta Metal Sin. 2005; 41(4):411–416.
19.
MazumderPTrivediRKarmaA.A model of convection-induced oscillatory structure foamation in peritectic alloys. Metal Trans A Metall Mater Trans A. 2000; 31:1233–1246.
20.
HunzikerOVandyoussefiMKurzW.Phase and microstructure selection in peritectic alloys close to the limit of constitutional undercooling. Acta Mater. 1998; 46(18):6325–6336.
21.
GriesserSBernhardCDippenaarR.Mechanism of the peritectic phase transition in Fe-C and Fe-Ni alloys under conditions close to chemical and thermal equilibrium. ISIJ Int. 2014; 54(2):466–473.
22.
PhelanDReidMDippenaarR.Kinetics of the peritectic phase transformation: in-situ measurements and phase field modeling. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006; 37(3):985–994.
23.
ShibataHAraiYSuzukiMKinetics of peritectic reaction and transformation in Fe-C alloys. Metall Mater Trans B. 2000; 31(5):981–991.
24.
ChaubeS.Mathematical modelling of morphological transition and spot segregation in continuously-cast high carbon steel billets. Int J Eng Sys Model Simul. 2008; 10(1):26–38.
25.
Choudhary SKGangulyS.Morphology and segregation in continuously cast high carbon steel billets. ISIJ Int. 2007; 47(12):1759–1766.
26.
KonishiJMilitzerMSamarasekeraI VModeling the formation of longitudinal facial cracks during continuous casting of hypoperitectic steel. Metall Mater Trans B. 2002; 33(3):413–423.
27.
DuFWangXYuGStudy on the non-uniform slab shrinkage of special steel during slab continuous casting. Ironmak Steelmak. 2018; 45(5):420–425.
28.
ZhangRZhangZShenM.Numerical analysis of the influence of carbon content on the initial shell of continuous casting slab. Ironmak Steelmak. 2018; 45(8):747–754.
29.
GriesserSBernhardCDippenaarR.Effect of nucleation undercooling on the kinetics and mechanism of the peritectic phase transition in steel. Acta Mater. 2014; 81:111–120.
30.
HuntJDLuS.Numerical modelling of cellular and dendritic array growth: spacing and structure predictions. Metall Mater Trans A. 1996; 27(3):611–623.
31.
KurzWFisherDJ.Dendrite growth at the limit of stability-tip radius and spacing. Acta Metall. 1981; 29(1):11–20.
32.
KurzWGiovanolaBTrivediR.Theory of microstructural development during rapid solidification. Acta Metall. 1986; 34(5):823–830.
33.
KurzWGiovanolaBTrivediR.Microsegregation in rapidly solidified Ag-15wt-percent-Cu. J Cryst Growth. 1988; 91(1–2):123–125.
34.
TrivediR.Interdendritic spacing: part II. A comparison of theory and experiment. Metall Trans A. 1988; 15(6):353–358.
35.
WonYMHanHNYeoTJAnalysis of solidification cracking using the specific crack susceptibility. ISIJ Int. 2000; 40(2):129–136.
36.
KimKHYeoTOhKHEffect of carbon and sulfur in continuously cast strand on longitudinal surface cracks. ISIJ Int. 1996; 36(3):284–289.
37.
ClyneTWWolfMKurzW.The effect of melt composition on solidification cracking of steel with particular reference to continuous casting. Metall Mater Trans B. 1982; 13(2):259–266.
38.
LiYQLiuJHDengZQPeritectic solidification characteristics and mechanism of 15CrMoG steel. Acta Metal Sin. 2020; 56(10):1335–1354.
