Mg–Al–Zn alloys with different Al content and different cooling conditions were prepared. The solid solution content of Al and Zn in the alloy was determined by electrochemical phase separation. The results show that Al has a large amount of solid solution, while Zn has a very low amount. Al can play a role in solid solution strengthening, while Zn is very small. Al has a repulsive effect on Zn and reduces the solid solubility of Zn. The higher the Al content it has, the larger the Al solid solution and the smaller the Zn solid solution we observe. The higher the solidification cooling rate is, the greater the solid solution amount of Al and Zn is.
ZhaoSMengCMaoFInfluence of severe plastic deformation on dynamic strain aging of ultrafine grained Al–Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2014; 76:54–67. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.004.
2.
AgnewSRNieJF.Preface to the viewpoint set on: The current state of magnesium alloy science and technology. Scripta Mater.2010; 63:671–673. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.029.
WangXJXuDKWuRZWhat is going on in magnesium alloys?J Mater Sci Technol. 2018; 34:245–247. DOI:10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.019.
5.
NieKBWangXJWuKDevelopment of SiCp/AZ91 magnesium matrix nanocomposites using ultrasonic vibration. Mat Sci Eng A. 2012; 540:123–129.
6.
HomayunBAfsharA.Microstructure, mechanical properties, corrosion behavior and cytotoxicity of Mg–Zn–Al–Ca alloys as biodegradable materials. J Alloys Compd.2014; 607:1–10. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.059.
7.
WuPXuFDengKEffect of extrusion on corrosion properties of Mg-2Ca-χAl (χ = 0, 2, 3, 5) alloys. Corros Sci.2017; 127:280–290. DOI:10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.014.
8.
HuHYuALiNPotential magnesium alloys for high temperature die cast automotive applications: a review. Mater Manuf Process.2003; 18:687–717. DOI:10.1081/AMP-120024970.
9.
LuXZhaoGZhouJMicrostructure and mechanical properties of Mg-3.0Zn-1.0Sn-0.3Mn-0.3Ca alloy extruded at different temperatures. J Alloys Compd.2018; 732:257–269. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.210.
10.
NimityongskulSJonesMChoiHGrain refining mechanisms in Mg–Al alloys with Al4C3 microparticles. Mat Sci Eng A. 2010; 527:2104–2111. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.030.
11.
HuangYDKainerKUHortN.Mechanism of grain refinement of Mg–Al alloys by SiC inoculation. Scripta Mater. 2011; 64:793–796. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.005.
12.
MenHFanZ.Effects of solute content on grain refinement in an isothermal melt. Acta Mater. 2011; 59:2704–2712. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.
13.
JandaghiMRPouraliakbarHShiranMKGOn the effect of non-isothermal annealing and multi-directional forging on the microstructural evolutions and correlated mechanical and electrical characteristics of hot-deformed Al-Mg alloy. Mat Sci Eng A. 2016; 657:431–440. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.056.
14.
JandaghiMRPouraliakbarHHongSIGrain boundary transition associated intergranular failure analysis at TMAZ/SZ interface of dissimilar AA7475-AA2198 joints by friction stir welding. Mater Lett.2020; 280:128557. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128557.
15.
LuYZWangQD.Effects of rare earths on the microstructure, properties and fracture behavior of Mg–Al alloys. Mat Sci Eng A. 2000; 278:66–76. DOI:10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00604-8.
16.
TongGDLiuHFLiuYH.Effect of rare earth additions on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Trans Non-Ferrous Met Soc China. 2010; 20(S2):S336–S340.
17.
WangQLiuYHFangSJ.Evaluating the improvement of corrosion residual strength by adding 1.0wt.% yttrium into an AZ91D magnesium alloy. Mater Charact.2010; 61:674–682. DOI:10.1016/j.matchar.2010.03.013.
18.
Hume-RotheryWGilbertWMChannel-EvansKM.The freezing points, melting points, and solid solubility limits of the alloys of sliver and copper with the elements of the b sub-groups. Phil Trans R Soc Lond. 1934; 233:1–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/91292.
19.
SmithL. R. Physical chemistry of metals: by Lawrence S. Darken and Robert W, Franklin Institute,1953；573-574.DOI:10.1016/0016-0032(53)90328-7.
20.
ChelikowskyJR.Solid solubilities in divalent alloys. Phys Rev B.1979; 19:686–701. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.19.686.
21.
AlonsoJASimozarS.Prediction of solid solubility in alloys. Phys Rev B.1980; 22: 5583–5589. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.22.5583
22.
OuyangYFZhangBWLiaoSZA simple analytical EAM model for bcc metals including Cr and its application. Z. Phys. B Condensed Matter. 1996; 101:161–168. DOI:10.1007/s002570050195.
23.
ZhangBWTanZS.Prediction of the formation of binary metal-metal amorphous alloys by ion implantation. J Mater Sci Lett.1988; 7:681–682. DOI:10.1007/BF00722065.
24.
GarbogginiAMcshaneHB.Effect of zinc and silicon additions on structure and properties of rapidly solidified Mg–AI alloys. J Mater Sci Technol. 1994; 9: 763–770. DOI:10.1179/mst.1994.10.9.763.
25.
ZhouJXYangYSTongWHEffect of cooling rate on the solidified microstructure of Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy. Rare Metal Mat Eng. 2010; 39:1899–1902. DOI:10.1016/S1875-5372(10)60134-8.
26.
SongPWuGHLiuWCEffect of cooling rate on the microstructure and mechanical properties of sand-casting Mg–10Gd–3Y–0.5Zr magnesium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A. 2013; 562:152–160. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.016.
27.
JandaghiMRPouraliakbarHSabooriAComparative insight into the interfacial phase evolutions during solution treatment of dissimilar friction stir welded AA2198-AA7475 and AA2198-AA6013 aluminum sheets. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14:1290. DOI:10.3390/ma14051290.
WangerC.Thermodynamics of alloys. MA: Addison Wesley; America, New Jersey, 1952. p. 161–168
30.
MiedemaARde chattelPRde BoerFR.Time- and frequency-dependent correlation functions for the homogeneous and alternating-isotropic XY-models. Physica B + C. 1980; 100:1–28. DOI:10.1016/0378-4363(80)90054-6.
31.
ToopGW. Predicting ternary activities using binary data. Trans Metall Soc AIME. 1965; 233:850–855.
32.
KohlerR.Zur berechnung der thermodynamischen daten eines terniären systems aus den zugehärigen binären systemen. Monatsh Chem. 1960; 91:738–740. DOI:10.1007/BF00899814.
