CO gas adsorption has become a topic of great significance and worthy of investigation. The purpose of this study was to explore the CO adsorption of Al2O3/Zeolite composite films prepared by a roll coating method. XRD, FESEM, and EDX analyses have been used to study the structural, morphological, and elemental properties of Al2O3/Zeolite composite films. A gas analyzer was used to probe CO gas adsorption on the composite films at a constant temperature and pressure. The concentration of inlet CO gas and saturation level was 190 and 4 mg L−1, respectively. The maximum values of adsorption efficiency and uptake capacity were measured at 97.89% and 213.9 mg g−1. To determine the kinetic study, three models were investigated: pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intra-particle diffusion. The pseudo-second-order model was suitable for CO adsorption by Al2O3/Zeolite adsorbent. Additionally, the rate-controlling step for Al2O3/Zeolite adsorbent was identified through the intra-particle diffusion model.
ZhouQ, ChenW, XuL, . highly sensitive carbon monoxide (CO) gas sensors based on Ni and Zn doped SnO2 nanomaterials. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:4392–4399.
2.
ThomasVJ, RamaswamyS.Application of Graphene and Graphene compounds for Environmental Remediation. Sci Adv Mater. 2016;8:477–500.
3.
LiuS, FuLH, LiuYJ, Cu/C or Cu2O/C Composites: Selective synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in water Treatment. Sci Adv Mater. 2016;8:2045–2053.
4.
ZhouQ, XuL, UmarA, Pt nanoparticles decorated SnO2 nanoneedles for efficient CO gas sensing applications. Sens Actuat B Chem. 2018;256:656–664.
5.
ChenCY, LiuYR, LinSS, Role of annealing temperature on the formation of aligned zinc oxide nanorod arrays for efficient photocatalysts and photodetectors. Sci Adv Mater. 2016;8:2197–2203.
6.
BareaE, MontoroC, NavarroJAR.Toxic gas removal – metal–organic frameworks for the capture and degradation of toxic gases and vapours. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:5419–5430.
7.
VambolS, VambolV, SundararajanM, The nature and detection of unauthorized waste dump sites using remote sensing. Ecol Quest. 2019;30:43–55.
8.
MagnoneE, ParkSK, ParkJH.Effects of moisture contents in the common oak on carbonaceous aerosols generated from combustion processes in an indoor wood stove. Combust Sci Technol. 2016;188(6):982–996.
9.
VambolS, VambolV, SobynaV, Investigation of the energy efficiency of waste utilization technology, with considering the use of low-temperature separation of the resulting gas mixtures. Energetika. 2018;64(4):186–195.
10.
LuP, HuangQ, BourtsalasAT, Review on fate of chlorine during thermal processing of solid wastes. J Environ Sci. 2019;78:13–28.
11.
PalacínJ, MartínezD, ClotetE, Application of an array of metal-oxide semiconductor gas sensors in an assistant personal robot for early gas leak detection. Sensors. 2019;19(9):1957.
12.
SuhikovaY, VambolS, VambolV, Justification of the most rational method for the nanostructures synthesis on the semiconductors surface. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng. 2019;92(1–2):19–28.
13.
VambolS, BogdanovI, VambolV, Research into effect of electrochemical etching conditions on the morphology of porous gallium arsenid. East – Eur J Enterp Technol. 2017;6(5–90):22–31.
14.
YeomC, KimY.Mesoporous alumina with high capacity for carbon monoxide adsorption. Korean J Chem Eng. 2018;35:587–593.
15.
SandilandsEA, BatemanDN.Carbon monoxide. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;44:151–152.
16.
ChenY, QinH, HuJ.CO sensing properties and mechanism of Pd doped SnO2 thick-films. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;428:207–217.
17.
WangX, QinH, ChenY, Sensing mechanism of SnO2 (110) surface to CO: density Functional Theory Calculations. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:28548–28561.
18.
KangalKO, Arzimanİ, UzunG, Carbon monoxide poisoning in the workplace: A hidden danger. Apollo Med. 2016;13:196–197.
19.
BareaE, MontoroC, NavarroJAR.Toxic gas removal – metal–organic frameworks for the capture and degradation of toxic gases and vapours. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:5419–5430.
20.
SatoH, KosakaW, MatsudaR, Self-accelerating CO sorption in a soft nanoporous crystal. Science. 2014;343:167–170.
21.
YeomC, SelvarajR, KimY.Preparation of nanoporous alumina using aluminum chloride via precipitation templating method for CO adsorbent. J Ind Eng Chem. 2018;67:132–139.
22.
BobbittNS, MendoncaML, HowarthAJ, Metal–organic frameworks for the removal of toxic industrial chemicals and chemical warfare agents. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:3357–3385.
23.
NingH, LanZQ, GuoJ, Carbon-monoxide adsorption and dissociation on Nb (1 1 0) surface. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;328:641–648.
24.
OverH.Crystallographic study of interaction between adspecies on metal surfaces. Prog Surf Sci. 1998;58:249–376.
25.
FeibelmanP, HammerB, NørskovJK, The CO/Pt (111) Puzzle. J Phys Chem B. 2001;108:4018–4025.
26.
VangRT, WangJG, KnudsenJ, The adsorption structure of NO on Pd (111) at high Pressures studied by STM and DFT. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:14262–14265.
27.
HansenKH, SljivancaninZ, HammerB, An STM and DFT study of the ordered structures of NO on Pd (111). Surf Sci. 2002;496:1–9.
28.
PopaC, FlipseCFJ, JansenAPJ, NO structures adsorbed on Rh (111): theoretical approach to high-coverage STM images. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:245408.
29.
MavrikakisM, RempelJ, GreeleyJ, Atomic and molecular adsorption on Rh (111). J Chem Phys. 2002;117:6737–6744.
30.
GajdosM, HafnerJ, EichlerA.Ab initio density-functional study of NO on close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces: I. Molecular adsorption. J Phys Condens Matter. 2005;18:13–40.
31.
GloverTG, PetersonGW, SchindlerBJ, MOF-74 building unit has a direct impact on toxic gas adsorption. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66:163–170.
32.
MozaffariN, MirzahosseiniAHS, SariAH, Investigation of carbon monoxide gas adsorption on the Al2O3/Pd(NO3)2/zeolite composite film. J Theor Appl Phys. 2020;14:65–74.
33.
YinX, Zhou WD, LiJ, A highly sensitivity and selectivity Pt-SnO2 nanoparticles for sensing applications at extremely low level hydrogen gas detection. J Alloys Compd. 2019;805:229–236.
ŢăluS, BramowiczM, KuleszaS, Microstructure and micromorphology of Cu/Co nanoparticles: surface texture analysis. Electron Mater Lett. 2016;12:580–588.
38.
TaluS, BramowiczM, KuleszaS, Fractal features of carbon–nickel composite thin films. Microsc Res Technol. 2016;79:1208–1213.
39.
LehmanSE, LarsenSC.Zeolite and mesoporous silica nanomaterials: greener syntheses, environmental applications and biological toxicity. Environ Sci Nano. 2014;1:200–213.
40.
ThoteJA, ChattiRV, IyerKS, N-doped mesoporous alumina for adsorption of carbon dioxide. J Environ Sci. 2012;24:1979–1984.
41.
ChenC, AhnWS.CO2 capture using mesoporous alumina prepared by a sol–gel process. Chem Eng J. 2011;166:646–651.
42.
TabeshS, DavarF, EstarkiMRL.Preparation of γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles using modified sol-gel method and its use for the adsorption of lead and cadmium ions. J Alloys Compd. 2018;730:441–449.
43.
DejamL, SolaymaniS, AchourA, Correlation between surface topography, optical band gaps and crystalline properties of engineered AZO and CAZO thin films. Chem Phys Lett. 2019;719:78–90.
44.
TaluS, BramowicsM, KuleszaS, Microstructure and micromorphology of ZnO thin films: Case study on Al doping and annealing effects. Superlattice Microst. 2016;93:109–121.
45.
BoochaniA, NowroziB, KhodadadiJ, Novel graphene-like Co2VAl (111): case study on magnetoelectronic and optical properties by first-principles calculations. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121:3978–3986.
46.
KeshavarzA, ParangZ, NasseriA.The effect of sulfuric acid, oxalic acid, and their combination on the size and regularity of the porous alumina by anodization. J Nanostructure Chem. 2013;3:34.
47.
SaadiZ, SaadiR, FazaeliR.Fixed-bed adsorption dynamics of Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution using nanostructured γ-alumina. J Nanostructure Chem. 2013;3:48.
48.
AmrollahiM, Ghaneian MT, TabatabaeeM, Highly efficient catalyst for removal of heavy metal ions modified by a novel Schiff base ligand. J Nanostruct. 2018;8:374–382.
49.
Patra AK, DuttaA, BhaumikA.Self-assembled mesoporous γ-Al2O3 spherical nanoparticles and their efficiency for the removal of arsenic from water. J Hazard. Mater. 2012;201:170–177.
50.
AdimiM, MohammadpourM, FathinejadjirandehiH.Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by modified electro-Fenton method with nano porous aluminum Electrode. J Water Environ Nanotechnol. 2017;2:186–194.
51.
Kuklin MikhailS, HonkalaK, HäkkinenH.Computational study of adsorption of CO2, SO2, and H2CO on free-standing and molybdenum-supported CaO films. J Phys Chem C. 2019;123:7758–7765.
52.
FreundHJ, PacchioniG.Oxide ultra-thin films on metals: new materials for the design of supported metal catalysts. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:2224–2242.
53.
NiliusN.Properties of oxide thin films and their adsorption behavior studied by scanning tunneling microscopy and conductance spectroscopy. Surf Sci Rep. 2009;64:595–659.
54.
GiordanoL, PacchioniG.Oxide films at the nanoscale: new structures, new functions, and new materials. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:1244–1252.
55.
HonkalaK.Tailoring oxide properties: an impact on adsorption characteristics of molecules and metals. Surf Sci. Rep. 2014;69:366–388.
56.
PacchioniG, FreundH.Electron transfer at oxide surfaces. The MgO paradigm: from defects to ultrathin films. Chem Rev. 2013;113:4035–4072.
57.
SalehiM, ArabsarhangE.Solution combustion synthesis using Schiff-base aluminum complex without fuel and optical property investigations of alumina nanoparticles. Int Nano Lett. 2015;5:141–146.
58.
SamainL, JaworskiA, EdénM, Structural analysis of highly porous γ-Al2O3. J Solid State Chem. 2014;217:1–8.
59.
EuzenP, RaybaudP, KrokidisX, Alumina. Handbook of porous Solids. New York
: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2002. p. 1591–1677. doi:10.1002/9783527618286.ch23b.
60.
ParidaKM, Pradhan AmareshC, DasJ, Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized porous gamma-alumina by control precipitation method. Mater Chem Phys. 2009;113:244–248.
61.
BacarizaMC, BértoloR, GraçaI, The effect of the compensating cation on the catalytic performances of Ni/USY zeolites towards CO2 methanation. J CO2 UTIL. 2017;21:280–291.
62.
GuisnetM, Ramôa RibeiroF.Deactivation and Regeneration of Zeolite Catalysts. Catal Sci Ser, Imperial College Press. 2011: 3–18.
63.
WangL, ZhaoJ, WangL, Titanium-decorated graphene oxide for carbon monoxide capture and separation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:21126–21131.
64.
AckleyMW, RegeSU, SaxenaH.Application of natural zeolites in the purification and separation of gases. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003;61:25–42.
65.
NetoMB, MoellerA, StaudtR, Dynamic bed measurements of CO adsorption on microporous adsorbents at high pressures for hydrogen purification processes. Sep Purif Technol. 2011;77:251–260.
66.
MozaffariN, MozaffariN, ElahiSM, The method of preparation of carbon monoxide adsorbent. Ukrainian Patent NO. u2019096Kyiv: State Patent Office of Ukraine 2019.
67.
MozaffariN, MozaffariN, ElahiSH, The method of preparation of carbon monoxide adsorbent. Ukrainian Patent NO. u2019096Kyiv: State Patent Office of Ukraine 2019.
68.
ScherrerP.Bestimmung der größe und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels röntgenstrahlen. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse1918; 1918: 98. http://eudml.org/doc/59018.
69.
LangfordJI, WilsonAJC.Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size. J Appl Cryst. 1978;11:102–113.
70.
YinXT, Zhou WD, LvP, Tin dioxide nanoparticles with high sensitivity and selectivity for gas sensors at sub-ppm level of hydrogen gas detection. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2019;30:14687.
SamarghandiMR, Al-MusawiTJ, Mohseni-BandpiA, Adsorption of cephalexin from aqueous solution using natural zeolite and zeolite coated with manganese oxide nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2015;211:431–441.
73.
JellinekM, FankuchenI.X-ray diffraction Examination of gamma alumina. Ind Eng Chem. 1945;37:158–163.
74.
MingulinaEI, MaslennikovaGN, KorovinNV, General Chemistry Course Book. 2nd ed. Moscow, Russia
: Vysshaya Shkola; 1990. p. 446. revised, page.
75.
HaqueE, JunJW, TalapaneniSN, Superior adsorption capacity of mesoporous carbon nitride with basic CN framework for phenol. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:10801–10803.
76.
MartensS, OrtmannR, BrielerFJ, Periodic mesoporous Organosilicas as adsorbents of toxic trace gases out of the ambient air. Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie. 2014;640(3-4):632–640.
77.
SamandariS S, GulcanH O, SamandariS S, Efficient removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using Pullulan-graft-polyacrylamide porous hydrogel. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014; 225: 2177.
78.
MungondoriHH, MtetwaS, TichagwaL, Synthesis and application of a ternary composite of clay, saw-dust and peanut husks in heavy metal adsorption. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75(10):2443–2453.
79.
MozaffariN, SolaymaniS, AchourA, New insights into SnO2/Al2O3, Ni/Al2O3, and SnO2/Ni/Al2O3 composite films for CO adsorption: building a bridge between microstructures and adsorption properties. J Phys Chem C. 2020;124:3692–3701.
80.
TanhaeiB, AyatiA, LahtinenM, Preparation and characterization of a novel chitosan/Al2O3/magnetite nanoparticles composite adsorbent for kinetic, thermodynamic and isotherm studies of methyl Orange adsorption. Chem Eng J. 2015;259:1–10.
81.
LagergenS, SvenK.Zurtheorie der sogenannten adsorption gelösterstoffe. vetensk Akad Handl. 1898;24(4):1–39.
82.
SiziriciB, YildizI.Adsorption capacity of iron oxide-coated gravel for landfill leachate: simultaneous study. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017;14:1027–1036.
83.
SubhanF, AslamS, YanZ, Confinement of mesopores within ZSM-5 and functionalization with Ni NPs for deep desulfurization. Chem Eng J. 2018;354:706–715.
84.
NegmNA, Abd El WahedMG, HassanA, Feasibility of metal adsorption using brown algae and fungi: effect of biosorbents structure on adsorption isotherm and kinetics. J Mol Liq. 2018;264:292–305.
85.
IdrisSA, AlotaibiKM, PeshkurTA, Adsorption kinetic study: effect of adsorbent pore size distribution on the rate of Cr (VI) uptake. Micropor Mesopor Mat. 2013;165:99–105.
86.
AlyZ, GrauletA, ScalesN, Removal of aluminium from aqueous solutions using PAN-based adsorbents: characterisation, kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;23:3972–3986.
87.
RepoE, WarchołJK, BhatnagarA, Aminopolycarboxylic acid functionalized adsorbents for heavy metals removal from water. Water Res. 2013;47:4812–4832.
88.
ChaudrySA, KhanTA, AliI.Adsorptive removal of Pb(II) and Zn(II) from water onto manganese oxide-coated sand: isotherm, thermodynamic and kinetic studies. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci. 2016;3:287–300.
89.
ChangmaiM, PriyeshJP, PurkaitMK.Al2O3 nanoparticles synthesized using various oxidizing agents: defluoridation performance. J Sci Adv Mater Dev. 2017;2:483–492.
90.
ShekarrizM, RamezaniZ, ElhamiF.Preparation and characterization of ZSM5-supported nano-zero-valent iron and its potential application in nitrate remediation from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2017;14:1081–1090.
91.
HameedBH.Removal of cationic dye from aqueous solution using jackfruit peel as non-conventional low-cost adsorbent. J Hazard Mater. 2009;162:344–350.
