Electroplated hard Cr-coated 17-4 PH stainless steel is regularly used in various parts of fuel handling system of nuclear reactors. In this study, the Cr-coated samples were investigated in detail for the coating adhesion using micro-scratch tester and ball indentation. Tribological investigation of the Cr coating was done in a reciprocating ball-on-plate dry sliding geometry against SS 440C ball counterbody. The wear and coefficient of friction (COF) tests were performed under five different loading conditions (3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 N) and three different sliding frequencies (5, 10 and 15 Hz). Wear scars on chromium coating were examined in detail by FESEM and 3D optical profilometer to understand the wear mechanism. It was observed that beyond 7 N critical load, the coating was prone to wear out drastically. Corrosion rate of the coating was estimated in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution by potentiodynamic experiment.
SmithWF.Structure and properties of engineering alloys. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1993.
2.
RackHJ, KalishD.The strength, fracture toughness, and low cycle fatigue behavior of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans B. 1974;5:1595–1605. doi:10.1007/BF02646331
3.
ViswanathanUK, BanerjeeS, KrishnanR.Effects of aging on the microstructure of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 1988;104:181–189. doi:10.1016/0025-5416(88)90420-X
4.
CharanJJ, KhanMA, ChawlaDS, . Experimental stress analysis of seal disc of 500 MWe PHWR. BARC Report, 1996, BARC/1996/I/003.
5.
BansalS, BhattacharyyaS, PatelRJ, . Design and development of face seal type sealing plug for advanced heavy water reactor. BARC Report, 2005, BARC/2005/E/022.
6.
TotlaniMK, GroverAK, AthavaleSN, . Functional plating. In: RajagopalI, editor. International Workshop on Surface Engineering and Coatings. Bangalore: NAL; June 25–30, 1998. p. 151–159.
7.
LucasJP. Valve materials performance observed in bench and simulated coal gasification /liquefaction testing. SANDIA REPORT, 1983, SAND82-2363.
8.
DaureJL, CarringtonMJ, ShipwayPH, . A Comparison of the galling wear behaviour of PVD Cr and electroplated hard Cr thin films. Surf Coat Technol. 2018;350:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.06.070
9.
GawneDT, MaU.Friction and wear of chromium and nickel coatings. Wear. 1989;129:123–142. doi:10.1016/0043-1648(89)90284-6
10.
TabriziAT, AghajaniH, LalehFF.Tribological study of thin-electroplated chromium: evaluation of wear rate as a function of surface roughness. Exp Tech. 2021;7:369–379. doi:10.1007/s40799-021-00502-z
11.
FedrizziL, RossiS, BelleiF, . Wear–corrosion mechanism of hard chromium coatings. Wear. 2002;253:1173–1181. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00254-5
GawneDT, MaU.Engineering properties of chromium plating and electroless and electroplated nickel. Surf. Eng. 1988;4:239–249. doi:10.1179/sur.1988.4.3.239
14.
MandichNV, SynderD.Electrodeposition of chromium. In: SchlesingerM, PaunovicM, editors. Modern electroplating; 5th ed. Hoboken: NJ: Wiley; 2010. p. 205–248.
15.
DubpernellG.Chromium. In: LowenheimFA, editor. Modern electroplating. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.; 1974. p. 80–129.
16.
Do NascimentoMP, VoorwaldHJC.The significance and determination by image analysis of microcrack density in hard chromium plating. Plat Surf Finish. 2008;95:36–42.
17.
Failure Analysis and Prevention, American Society for Metals Handbook. Metals Park (OH): ASM International; 1993.
18.
AliN, FanQH, GracioJ, . Characterisation of stress and adhesion in diamond coatings deposited on Ti and Cr substrates using CVD. Surf Eng. 2002;18(4):260–264. doi:10.1179/026708402225005340
19.
LarssonM, OlssonM, HedenqvistP, . Mechanisms of coating failure a demonstrated by scratch and indentation testing of TiN coated HSS. Surf Eng. 2000;16(5):436–444. doi:10.1179/026708400101517350
20.
MehrotraPK, QuintoDT.Techniques for evaluating mechanical properties of hard coatings. J Vac Sci Technol A. 1985;3:2401–2405. doi:10.1116/1.572846
21.
GonczyST.An ASTM standard for quantitative scratch adhesion testing of thin, hard ceramic coatings. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2005;2(5):422–428. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02043.x
22.
Zagula-YavorskaM, KrupaK, SieniawskiJ.Adhesion investigation of rhodium electroplated layers on nickel substrate. Adv Manufac Sci Technol. 2016;40(2):67–77. doi:10.2478/amst-2016-0011
23.
ASTM International. Standard test method for adhesion strength and mechanical failure modes of ceramic coatings by quantitative single point scratch testing. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM C1624-05; 2010.
24.
BullSJ.Can the scratch adhesion test ever be quantitative? In: MittalKL, editor. Adhesion measurement of films and coatings, Vol 2. London: CRC Press; 1st ed.; 2001. p. 107–130.
25.
BlauPJ.Lab handbook of scratch testing. Oak Ridge (TN): Blue Rock Tech. Pub.; 2002. p. 1.2.
26.
MekichaMA, De RooijMB, MatthewsDTA, . The effect of hard chrome plating on iron fines formation. Tribol Int. 2020;140:106003–106011. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2019.106003
27.
MahmudDNF, AbdollahMFB, MasripanNAB, . Influence of contact pressure and sliding speed dependence on the tribological characteristics of an activated carbon-epoxy composite derived from palm kernel under dry sliding conditions. Friction. 2019;7(3):227–236. doi:10.1007/s40544-018-0205-y
28.
AnanthMP, RameshR.Reciprocating sliding wear performance of hard coating on modified titanium alloy surfaces, Tribol. Trans. 2015;58:169–176. doi:10.1080/10402004.2014.943338
29.
MitrovićS, BabićM, AdamovićD, . Wear behaviour of hard Cr coatings for cold forming tools under dry sliding conditions. Tribol Industry. 2012;24:44–48.
30.
LeeL, BeheraP, SriramanKR, . The effect of contact stress on the sliding wear behaviour of Zn-Ni electrodeposited coatings. Wear. 2018;400-401:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2017.12.018
31.
WuM, ZhaoZ, WangX, . Corrosion behavior of 17–4 PH stainless steel in simulated marine environment. Mater Corr. 2018: 1–9. doi:10.1002/maco.201810454
