Much local economic policy in the UK assumes either an inward investment guise or involves some form of work with the local productive sector. This article critically examines both forms of policy as practised in a Merseyside context. It concludes that inward investment and local industrial development work undertaken by MERCEDO was in many ways regressive and broadly reducible to the development of capital. The later orientation of MERCEDO policy towards the unemployed and other labour groups is found to be a more progressive form of intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeningtonJ., 1986: Local economic strategies: paradigms for a planned economy — or a playground for the new left, Local Economy, No.1
2.
BeynonH., 1973: Working for Ford, Wakefield, E.P. Publishing
3.
GeddesM., 1981: The role of the state in regional development: the Highlands and the Islands Development Board, Polytechnic of the South Bank Department of Town Planning Occasional Paper OP2/81
4.
Mercedo, undated: The Complete Economic Development Package
5.
Merseyside Socialist Research Group, 1980: Merseyside in Crisis, Manchester Free Press
6.
TymRogerPartners, 1984: Merseyside integrated development operation, Final Report, Volume I