Four experiments examined attentional capture by colour as assessed by two different investigative methods. Subjects performed a visual search task for a vertical-target line embedded among tilted-distractor lines, presented inside 4, 8, or 12 coloured discs. Interestingly, when the colour singleton was task irrelevant, and data were analysed by means of the display-size method combined with the zero-slope criterion, no evidence for attentional capture by colour was found. However, when data were analysed by means of the distance method, which consists of monitoring the spatial relationship between the target and the singleton, results showed that the target was found faster and/or more accurately when it was inside the singleton than when it was in a nonsingleton location. This provided evidence for a stimulus-driven attentional capture. In addition, the application of signal detection methodology showed that attentional capture, as revealed by the distance method, resulted from a perceptual modulation at the singleton location, rather than from a criterion shift. We conclude that, at least with the kind of stimuli used here, the display-size method combined with the zero-slope criterion is less than ideal for investigating how static discontinuities can affect the automatic deployment of visual attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaconW. F. & EgethH. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics55485–496.
2.
CaveK. R. (1999). The FeatureGate model of visual selection. Psychological Research62182–194.
3.
CaveK.R. & WolfeJ.M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology22225–271.
4.
CaveK. R. & ZimmermanJ. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychological Science8399–403.
5.
Di LolloV.KawaharaJ.ZuvicS. M.VisserT. A. W. (2001). The preattentive emperor has no clothes: A dynamic redressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130479–492.
FaubertJ. & Von Grünau, M. W. (1995).The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction. Vision Research353119–3130.
9.
FolkC. L. & AnnettS. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? Perception and Psychophysics56277–287.
10.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W. & JohnstonJ. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance181030–1044.
11.
GalfanoG. & TurattoM. (2002). Modulability does not undermine the stimulus-driven nature of attentional capture. Psicológica23318–326.
12.
GibsonB. S. & JiangY. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected colour singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science9176–182.
13.
HandyT. C.JhaA. P. & MangunG. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science10157–161.
14.
HirosakaO.MiyauchiS. & ShimojoS. (1991). Focal visual attention produces motion sensation in lines. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 32 (Supplement), 716.
15.
HorstmannG. (2002). Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising colour singleton in visual search. Psychological Science13499–505.
16.
IttiL. & KochC. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research401489–1506.
17.
JonidesJ.(1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In LongJ. B. & BaddeleyD.A. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18.
JonidesJ. & YantisS. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics43346–354.
19.
JosephJ. S.ChunM. M. & NakayamaK. (1997). Attentional requirements in a preattentive feature search task. Nature, 387, 805–808.
20.
Kim, M.-S., & Cave, K. R. (2001). Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task. Vision Research41611–624.
21.
KochC. & UllmanS. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology4219–227.
22.
MacmillanN.A. & CreelmanC.D. (1991). Detection theory: Auser's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Martin-EmersonR. & KramerA. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets. Perception and Psychophysics59739–751.
24.
MüllerH.J. & RabbittP.M.A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15315–330.
25.
NeisserU. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
26.
NieburE. & KochC.(1998). Computational architectures for attention. In ParasuramanR. (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 163–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
O'ReganJ.K.RensinkR.A. & ClarkJ.J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of“mudsplashes”. Nature, 398, 34.
28.
PalmerJ. (1998). Attentional effectsin visual search: Relating search accuracy and search time. In R.D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 348–388). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 3–25.
30.
PosnerM.I. & CohenY.(1984). Components of visual orienting. In BoumaH.&D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31.
PosnerM. I.NissenM. J. & OgdenW. C.(1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In PickH. L.&I.J. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 137–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32.
PosnerM.I.SnyderC.R.R. & DavidsonB.J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General109160–174.
33.
RuzM. & LupiáñezJ. (2002). A review on attentional capture: On its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicólogica23283–309.
34.
SagiD. & JuleszB. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision239–49.
35.
SchmidtW. C. (2000). An alternative method of assessing stimulus-driven attentional capture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA, USA.
36.
SchollB. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition7377–396.
37.
ShiffrinR. M. & GardnerG. T. (1972). Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology9372–82.
38.
SimonsD. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4147–155.
39.
TheeuwesJ. & BurgerR. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance241342–1353.
40.
ToddS. & KramerA. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics56198–210.
41.
ToddJ.T.Van GelderP. (1979). Implications of a sustained-transient dichotomy for the measurement of human performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5625–638
42.
TownsendJ. T. (1972). Some results on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology25168–199.
43.
TreismanA. & GeladeG. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology1297–136.
44.
TreismanA. & SatoS.(1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16459–478.
45.
TurattoM. & GalfanoG. (2000). Colour, form, and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research401639–1643.
46.
TurattoM. & GalfanoG. (2001). Attentional capture by colour without any relevant attentional set. Perception and Psychophysics63286–297.
47.
Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631–650.
48.
Von Grünau, M. W., Faubert, J., Iordanova, M., & Rajska, D. (1999). Flicker and the efficiency of cues for capturing attention. Vision Research393241–3252.
49.
WolfeJ. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1202–238.
WolfeJ. M. (1998b). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science933–39.
52.
WolfeJ. M.CaveK. R. & FranzelS. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15419–433.
53.
WolfeJ. M.Friedman-HillS. R.StewartM. I. & O'ConnellK. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance1834–49.
54.
YantisS. (1993a). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science2156–161.
55.
YantisS. (1993b). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19676–681.
56.
YantisS. & EgethH.E. (1999). On the distinction between visual saliency and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25661–676.
57.
YantisS. & JohnsonD. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16812–825.
58.
YantisS. & JonidesJ. (1990). Abrupt visual onset and selective attention: Voluntaryvs. automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16121–134.
