Deontic reasoning has been studied in two subfields of psychology: the cognitive and moral reasoning literatures. These literatures have drawn different conclusions about the nature of deontic reasoning. The consensus within the cognitive reasoning literature is that deontic reasoning is a unitary phenomenon, whereas the consensus within the moral reasoning literature is that there are different subdomains of deontic reasoning. We present evidence from a series of experiments employing the methods of both literatures suggesting that people make a systematic distinction between two types of deontic rule: social contracts and precautions. The results call into question the prevailing opinion in the cognitive reasoning literature and provide further support for both an evolutionary view of deontic reasoning and the more domain-specific perspective found in the moral reasoning literature.
AlmorA., & SlomanS. (2000). Reasoning versus text processing in the Wason selection task: A nondeontic perspective on perspective effects.Memory & Cognition, 28, 1060–1070.
3.
ArkesH., & AytonP. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600.
4.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation.New York: Basic Books.
5.
AxelrodR., & HamiltonW. (1981). The evolution of cooperation.Science, 211, 1390–1396.
6.
BarbieriM. (1993). Important variables in reasoning about social rules.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 589–607.
7.
Baron-CohenS. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BarrettH. C. (1999 June). Guilty minds: How perceived intent, incentive, and ability to cheat influence social contract reasoning.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
ChengP., & HolyoakK. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories.Cognition, 33, 285–313.
11.
ChiuC., DweckC., TongJ. Y., & FuJ. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923–940.
12.
CosmidesL. (1985). Deduction or Darwinian algorithms?: An explanation of the “elusive” content effect on the Wason selection task.Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. (University Microfilms 86-02206.)
13.
NucciL., & WeberE. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children's conceptions of the personal.Child Development, 66, 1438–1452.
14.
NuñezM., & HarrisP. (1998). Psychological and deontic concepts: Separate domains or intimate connection?Mind & Language, 13, 153–170.
15.
OaksfordM., & ChaterN. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection.Psychological Review, 101, 608–631.
16.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child.New York: Free Press.
17.
PlattR., & GriggsR. (1993). Facilitation in the abstract selection task: The effects of attentional and instructional factors.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 591–613.
18.
PolitzerG., & Nguyen-XuanA. (1992). Reasoning about promises and warnings: Darwinian algorithms, mental models, relevance judgments or pragmatic schemas?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 401–421.
19.
RozinP. (1997). Moralization. In BrandtA. & RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 379–401). New York: Routledge.
20.
RozinP. (1999). The process of moralization.Psychological Science, 10, 218–221.
21.
RozinP., LoweryL., ImadaS., & HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions(contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes(community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.
22.
ShwederR., MahapatraM., & MillerJ. (1987). Culture and moral development. In KaganJ. & LambS. (Eds.), The emergence of moral concepts in early childhood (pp. 1–83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
ShwederR., MuchN., MahapatraM., & ParkL. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In BrandtA. & RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.
24.
SmetanaJ. (1995a). Morality in context: Abstractions, ambiguities and applications.Annals of Child Development, 10, 83–130.
25.
SmetanaJ. (1995b). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence.Child Development, 66, 299–316.
26.
SmetanaJ., & AsquithP. (1994). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy.Child Development, 65, 1147–1162.
27.
SmetanaJ., & BitzB. (1996). Adolescents' conceptions of teachers' authority and their relations to rule violations in school.Child Development, 67, 1153–1172.
28.
SongM., SmetanaJ., & KimS.Y. (1987). Korean children's conceptions of moral and conventional transgressions.Developmental Psychology, 23, 577–582.
29.
SperberD., CaraF., & GirottoV. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task.Cognition, 57, 31–95.
30.
StoneV., CosmidesL., ToobyJ., KrollN., & KnightR. (2002). Selective impairment of reasoning about social exchange in a patient with bilateral limbic system damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 11531–11536.
31.
TisakM. (1993). Preschool children's judgments of moral and personal events involving physical harm and property damage.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 375–390.
32.
TisakM., & TurielE. (1984). Children's conceptions of moral and prudential rules.Child Development, 55, 1030–1039.
33.
TisakM., & TurielE. (1988). Variation in seriousness of transgressions and children's moral and conventional concepts.Developmental Psychology, 24, 352–357.
34.
TriversR. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism.Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.
35.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
TurielE. (1998). The development of morality. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol.3, pp. 863–932). New York: Wiley.
37.
WasonP. (1968). Reasoning about a rule.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–281.
38.
WilliamsB. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
YachaninS. (1986). Facilitation in Wason's selection task: Content and instructions.Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, 20–29.
