Syllable structure influences hearing students’ reading and spelling (e.g., Badecker, 1996; Caramazza & Miceli, 1990; Prinzmetal, Treiman, & Rho, 1986; Rapp, 1992; Treiman & Zukowski, 1988). This may seem unsurprising since hearers closely associate written and spoken words. We analysed a corpus of spelling errors made by deaf students. They would have learned English orthography with an attenuated experience of speech. We found that the majority of their errors were phonologically implausible but orthographically legal. A tendency to replace uncommon letter sequences with common sequences could not account for this pattern, nor could residual influence from speech. Since syllabically defined constraints are required to keep sequences orthographically legal, the deaf data are marked by an influence of syllable structure. Two main conclusions follow: (1) Our results contribute to evidence that abstract constraints, not derived from peripheral speech or hearing mechanisms, govern the organization of linguistic knowledge; and (2) statistical redundancy could not explain the deaf results. It does not offer a general alternative to suprasegmental structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronP. G., KeetayV., BoydM., PalmatierS., & WacksJ. (1998). Spelling without phonology: A study of deaf and hearing children.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 1–22.
2.
AndersonS. R. (1974). The organisation of phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
BaayenR., PiepenbrockR., & VanRijnH. (1995). The CELEX lexical data base(CD-ROM). University of Pennsyl-vania, Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
4.
BadeckerW. (1996). Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems. Lingua, 99, 55–83.
5.
BaronJ., & StrawsonC. (1976). Useoforthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.
6.
BloomfieldL. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.
7.
BruckM., & TreimanR. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 156–178.
8.
BuraniC., & CafieroR. (1991). The role of subsyllabic structure in lexical access to printed words.Psychological Research, 53, 42–52.
9.
BurdenV., & CampbellR. (1994). The development of word-coding skills in the born deaf: An experimental study of deaf school leavers.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 331–349.
10.
CampbellR., & WrightH. (1988). Deafness, spelling and rhyme: How spelling supports written word and picture rhyming skills in deaf subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 771-788.
11.
CampbellR., & WrightH. (1989). Immediate memory in the orally trained deaf: effects of “lipreadability” in the recall of written syllables.British Journal of Psychology, 80, 299–312.
12.
CaramazzaA., & MiceliG. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations.Cognition, 37, 243–297.
13.
ChenK. (1976). Acoustic image in visual detection for deaf and hearing college students.Journal of General Psychology, 94, 243–246.
14.
ClementsG. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ColtheartM. (1978). Lexical accessin simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.
16.
ConradR. (1972). Short-term memory in the deaf: A test for speech coding. British Journal of Psychology, 63(2), 173-180.
17.
ConradR. (1979). The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row.
18.
ConradR., & RushM. (1965). On the nature of short-term memory encoding by the deaf.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 30, 336–343.
19.
CorcoranD. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210, 658.
20.
DoddB. (1980). The spelling abilities of profoundly prelingually deaf children. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. New York: Academic Press.
21.
ErberN. (1974). Effects of angle, distance and illumination on visual reception of speech by profoundly deaf children.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 99–112.
22.
ErberN. (1983). Speech perception and speech development in hearing-impaired children. In I. Hochberg, H. Levitt, & M. Osberger (Eds.), Speech of the hearing impaired. Baltimore: University Park Press.
23.
FudgeE. C. (1969). Syllables.Journal of Linguistics, 5, 253–286.
24.
GatesA., & ChaseE. (1926). Methods and theories of learning to spell tested by studies of deaf children. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 289–300.
25.
GibsonE., ShurcliffA., & YonasA. (1970). Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In H. Levin & J. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies in reading. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
GoswamiU. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83.
28.
HannaP., HannaJ., HodgesR., & RudorfE. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: Office of Education.
29.
HansonV. (1982a). Short-term recallby deaf signersof American Sign Language: Implications of encoding strategy for order recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 572–583.
30.
HansonV. (1982b). Use of orthographic structure by deaf adults: Recognition of fingerspelled words.Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 343–356.
31.
HansonV. (1986). Access to spoken language and the acquisition of orthographic structure: Evidence from deaf readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 193-212.
32.
HansonV. (1990). Recall of order information by deaf signers: Phonetic coding in temporal order recall.Memory & Cognition, 18, 604–610.
33.
HansonV., & FowlerC. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers.Memory & Cognition, 15, 199–207.
34.
HansonV., LibermanI., & ShankweilerD. (1984). Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 378–393.
35.
HansonV., & McGarrN. (1989). Rhyme generation by deafadults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 2–11.
36.
HansonV., ShankweilerD., & FischerF. (1983). Determinantsofspelling abilityindeaf and hearing adults: Access to linguistic structure.Cognition, 14, 323–344.
37.
HarrisK., & McGarr, N. (1980). Relationships between speech perception and speech productioninnormal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. In J. Subtelny (Ed.), Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
38.
HaugenE. (1956a). Syllabification in Kutenai.International Journal of American Linguistics, 22, 196–201.
39.
HaugenE. (1956b). The syllable in linguistic description. In M. Halle, H. G. Lunt, H. McLean, & C. H. van Schooneveld (Eds.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
40.
HoardJ. (1971). Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabification in English.Language, 47, 133–140.
41.
HoltJ. A. (1993). Stanford Achievement Test-8th edition: Reading comprehension subgroup results.American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172–175.
42.
KahnD. (1980). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. New York: Garland Press.
43.
KatzL., & BaldasareJ. (1983). Syllable codinginprinted-word recognitionbychildren and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 245–256.
KuceraH., & FrancisW. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
46.
LevittH., & StrombergH. (1983). Segmental characteristics of the speech of hearing-impaired children: Factors affecting intelligibility. In I. Hochberg, H. Levitt, & M. Osberger (Eds.), Speech of the hearing impaired. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
47.
LeybaertJ. (1993). Reading in the deaf: The roles of phonological codes. In M. Marschark & M. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48.
LeybaertJ., & AlegriaJ. (1995). Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 89–109.
49.
LockeJ. (1978). Phonemic effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf children.Cognition, 6, 175–187.
50.
LockeJ., & LockeV. (1971). Deaf children's phonetic, visualand dactylic coding in a grapheme recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 142-146.
51.
MattinglyI. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process and linguistic awareness. In J. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
MeadowK. (1980). Deafness and child development. London: Edward Arnold.
53.
MerrillsJ. D., UnderwoodG., & WoodD. J. (1994). The word recognition skills of profoundly prelingually deaf children.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 365–384.
54.
MetzD., WhiteheadR.,& MahshieJ. (1982). Physiological correlates of the speech ofthe deaf: Apreliminary view. In D. Sims, G. Walter, & R. Whitehead (Eds.), Deafness and communication. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
55.
MewhortD., & BealA. (1977). Mechanisms of word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 629–640.
56.
MillisM. (1986). Syllables and spelling units affect feature integration in words. Memory & Cognition, 14, 409–419.
57.
OhalaD. (1999). The influence of sonority on children's cluster reductions.Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 297–422.
58.
OlsonA. C., & NickersonJ. F. (2001). Syllabic organization and deafness: Orthographic structure or letter frequency in reading?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(2), 421-438.
59.
ParkinA. (1982). Phonological recoding in lexical decision: Effects of spelling-to-sound regularity depend on how regularity is defined.Memory & Cognition, 10, 43–53.
60.
PrinzmetalW., HoffmanH., & VestK. (1991). Automatic processes in word perception: An analysis from illusory conjunctions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 902–923.
61.
PrinzmetalW., TreimanR., & RhoS. (1986). How to see a reading unit.Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461–475.
62.
QuigleyS., & PaulP. (1984). Language and deafness. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
63.
RappB. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined.Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33–53.
64.
ReillyA. (1979). Syllable nucleus duration in the speech of hearing and deaf children. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, USA.
65.
RomaniC., & CalabreseA. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient.Brain & Language, 64, 83–121.
66.
SaussureF. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
67.
SeidenbergM. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention & performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
68.
SeidenbergM., & McClellandJ. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
69.
SeidenbergM., WatersG., BarnesM., & TanenhausM. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.
70.
SelkirkE.O. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
71.
SiedleckiT.Jr., VotawM., & BonvillianJ. (1990). The effects of manual interference and reading level on deaf subjects' recall of word lists.Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 185–199.
72.
SolsoR., & JuelC. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 297–343.
73.
SpoehrK. (1978). Phonological encodingin visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 127–141.
74.
SpoehrK., & SmithE. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71–89.
75.
Sprenger-CharollesL.,& SiegelL.S. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of syllabic structure on the development of reading and spelling skills in French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 485–505.
76.
SterneA., & GoswamiU. (2000). Phonological awareness of syllables, rhymes and phonemes in deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(5), 609-625.
77.
SutcliffeA., DowkerA., & CampbellR. (1999). Deaf children's spelling: Does it show sensitivity to phonology?Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(2), 111-123.
78.
TaftM. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.Memory & Cognition, 7, 263–272.
79.
TaftM. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in lexical processing of polysyllabic words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–1014.
80.
TranslerC., LeybaertJ., & GombertJ. E. (1999). Do deaf children use phonological syllables as reading units?Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(2), 124-143.
81.
TreimanR. (1991). Children's spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346–360.
82.
TreimanR. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell.In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 65–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
83.
TreimanR., & ChafetzJ. (1987). Arethere onset- andrime-like unitsinprinted words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention & performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
84.
TreimanR., & ZukowskiA. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466–477.
85.
TreimanR., & ZukowskiA. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification.Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 66–85.
86.
VenezkyR. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
87.
WatersG., & DoehringD. (1990). The nature and role of phonological information in reading acquisition: Insights from congenitally deaf children who communicate orally. In T. Carr & B. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press.
