We tested and confirmed the hypothesis that the prior presentation of nonwords in lexical decision is the net result of two opposing processes: (1) a relatively fast inhibitory process based on global familiarity; and (2) a relatively slow facilitatory process based on the retrieval of specific episodic information. In three studies, we manipulated speed-stress to influence the balance between the two processes. Experiment 1 showed item-specific improvement for repeated nonwords in a standard “respond-when-ready” lexical decision task. Experiment 2 used a 400-ms deadline procedure and showed performance for nonwords to be unaffected by up to four prior presentations. In Experiment 3 we used a signal-to-respond procedure with variable time intervals and found negative repetition priming for repeated nonwords. These results can be accounted for by dual-process models of lexical decision (e.g., Balota & Chumbley, 1984; Balota & Spieler, 1999).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR., & van RijnH. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM].Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2.
BalotaD. A., & ChumbleyJ. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10, 340–357.
3.
BalotaD. A., & SpielerD. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 32–55.
4.
BodnerG. E., & MassonM. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming of words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming. Journal of Memory and Language,37, 268–293.
5.
BowersJ. S. (1994). Does implicit memory extend to legal and illegal nonwords?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 534–549.
6.
BowersJ. S. (1996). Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: Was Morton right all along?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1336–1353.
7.
BowersJ. S. (1999). Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997). Psychological Review,106, 582–596.
8.
BowersJ. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,7, 83–99.
9.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR., & ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
10.
DorfmanJ. (1994). Sublexical components in implicit memory for novel words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20, 1108–1125.
11.
DuchekJ. M., & NeelyJ. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency × levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks. Memory and Cognition,17, 148–162.
12.
FeustelT. C.ShiffrinR. M., & SalasooA. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 309–346.
13.
GraingerJ., & JacobsA. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: Amultiple read-out model. Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
14.
HintzmanD. L., & CurranT. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language,33, 1–18.
15.
HintzmanD. L., & CurranT. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 228–247.
16.
HockleyW. E., & MurdockB. B. (1987). A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory. Psychological Review,94, 341–358.
17.
JoordensS., & HockleyW. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
18.
JuolaJ. F.FischlerI.WoodC. T., & AtkinsonR. C. (1971). Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory. Perception and Psychophysics,10, 8–14.
19.
LoganG. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
20.
LoganG. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms?Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–35.
21.
LoganG. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review,109, 376–400.
22.
MandlerG. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
23.
McKoonG., & RatcliffR. (1979). Priming in episodic and semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 463–480.
24.
PlautD. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes,12, 1–19.
25.
RatcliffR., & McKoonG. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review,95, 385–408.
26.
RatcliffR., & McKoonG. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21, 754–767.
27.
ScarboroughD. L.CorteseC., & ScarboroughH. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,3, 1–17.
28.
SchoutenJ. F., & BekkerJ. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica,27, 143–153.
29.
SmithM. E., & Oscar-BermanM. (1990). Repetition priming of words and nonwords in divided attention and in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,16, 1033–1042.
30.
StarkC. E. L., & McClellandJ. L. (2000). Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,26, 945–972.
31.
StoneG. O., & Van OrdenG. C. (1989). Are words represented by nodes?Memory and Cognition, 17, 511–524.
32.
StoneG. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,19, 744–774.
33.
TenpennyP. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2, 339–363.
34.
WagenmakersE. J. M.SteyversM.RaaijmakersJ. G. W.ShiffrinR. M., van RijnH., & ZeelenbergR. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332–367.
35.
WagenmakersE. J. M.ZeelenbergR., & RaaijmakersJ. G. W. (2000). Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,7, 662–667.
36.
WickelgrenW. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica,41, 67–85.
37.
YonelinasA. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: Areviewof30yearsofresearch. Journal of Memory and Language,46, 441–517.
38.
ZeelenbergR.WagenmakersE. J. M., & RaaijmakersJ. G. W. (2002). Repetition priming in implicit memory tasks: Prior study causes enhanced processing, not only bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 38–47.
39.
Original manuscript received 8 January 2002 Accepted revision received 25 July 2003 PrEview proof published online 9 January2004
