We investigated the impact of anxiety on movement behaviour during the execution of a complex perceptual-motor task. Masters’ (1992) conscious processing hypothesis suggests that under pressure an inward focus of attention occurs, resulting in more conscious control of the movement execution of well-learned skills. The conscious processes interfere with automatic task execution hereby inducing performance decrements. Recent empirical support for the hypothesis has focused on the effects of pressure on end performance. It has not been tested so far whether the changes in performance are also accompanied by changes in movement execution that would be expected following Masters’ hypothesis. In the current study we tested the effects of anxiety on climbing movements on a climbing wall. Two identical traverses at different heights on a climbing wall provided different anxiety conditions. In line with the conscious processing hypothesis we found that anxiety had a significant effect on participants’ movement behaviour evidenced by increases in climbing time and the number of explorative movements (Experiments 1 and 2) and by longer grasping of the holds and slower movements (Experiment 2). These results provide additional support for the conscious processing hypothesis and insight into the relation between anxiety, performance, and movement behaviour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJA (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills.Psychological Bulletin101, 41–74.
2.
AndersonGSLitzenbergerRPlecasD (2002). Physical evidence of police officer stress.Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management25, 399–420.
3.
ArthurWYoungBJordanJAShebilskeWL (1996). Effectiveness of individual and dyadic training protocols: The influence of trainee interaction.Human Factors38, 79–86.
4.
BaddeleyAD (1972). Selective attention and performance in dangerous environments.British Journal of Psychology63, 537–546.
5.
BaumeisterRF (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects on incentives on skillful performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46, 610–620.
6.
BeilockSLCarrTH (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130, 701–725.
7.
BeilockSLCarrTHMacMahonCStarkesSL (2002a). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied8, 6–15.
8.
BeilockSLWierengaSACarrTH (2002b). Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55A, 1211–1240.
9.
BernsteinNA (1996). Dexterity and its development. In M. L. Latash & M. T. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and its developmentpp. 3–244Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10.
BeuterADudaJL (1985). Analysis of the arousal/motor performance relationship in children using movement kinematics.Journal of Sport Psychology7, 229–243.
11.
BeuterADudaJLWiduleCJ (1989). The effect of arousal on joint kinematics and kinetics in children.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport60, 109–116.
12.
CohenJ (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13.
CollinsDJonesBFairweatherMDoolanSPriestleyN (2001). Examining anxiety associated changes in movement patterns.International Journal of Sport Psychology31, 223–242.
14.
den BrinkerBPLMStäblerJRLWWhitingHTAvan WieringenPCW (1986). The effect of manipulating knowledge of results on the learning of slalom-type ski movements.Ergonomics29, 31–40.
15.
den BrinkerBPLMvan HekkenMF (1982). The analysis of slalom-ski type movements using a ski-simulator apparatus.Human Movement Science1, 91–108.
16.
EdwardsTKingstonKHardyLGouldD (2002). A qualitative analysis of catastrophic performances and associated thoughts, feelings, and emotions.The Sport Psychologist16, 1–19.
17.
EysenckMWCalvoMG (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory.Cognition and Emotion6, 409–434.
18.
FittsPMPosnerMI (1967). Human performanceBelmont, CA:Brooks/Cole.
19.
GibsonEJ (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge.Annual Review of Psychology39, 1–41.
20.
GibsonEJSpelkeES (1983). The development of perception. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychologypp. 1–76New York:John Wiley & Sons.
21.
GouldDUdryE (1994). Psychological skills for enhancing performance: Arousal regulation skills.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise26, 478–485.
22.
HardyLJacksonB (1996). Effect of state anxiety upon effort and performance in rock climbers.Journal of Sport Psychology14, 31–32.
23.
HardyLMullenRJonesG (1996). Knowledge and conscious control of motor actions under stress.British Journal of Psychology87, 621–636.
24.
HoutmanILDBakkerFC (1989). The anxiety thermometer: A validation study.Journal of Personality Assessment53, 575–582.
25.
IdzikowskiCBaddeleyAD (1987). Fear and performance in novice parachutists.Ergonomics30, 1463–1474.
26.
JanelleCM (2002). Anxiety, arousal and visual attention: A mechanistic account of performance variability.Journal of Sports Sciences20, 237–251.
27.
JonesG (1995). More than just a game: Research developments and issues in competitive anxiety in sport.British Journal of Psychology86, 449–478.
28.
JonesGHantonS (2001). Pre-competitive feeling states and directional anxiety interpretations.Journal of Sports Sciences19, 385–395.
29.
KinnearPRGrayCD (2000). SPSS for Windows made simple. Release 10Hove, UK:Psychology Press Ltd.
30.
LandersDM (1980). Motivation and performance: The role of arousal and attentional factors. In W. F. Straub (Ed.), Sport psychology: An analysis of athlete behaviorpp. 91–103Ithaca, NY:Mouvement Publications.
31.
LandersDMArentSM (2001). Unraveling conceptual and methodological confusion surrounding the arousal–performance relationship. In A. Papaioannou, M. Goudas, & Y. Theodorakis (Eds.), International Society of Sport Psychology (ISSP), 10th World Congress of Sport Psychology5, pp. 129–131Thessaloniki, Hellas:Christodouli Publications.
32.
LandersDMBoutcherSH (1998). Arousal–performance relationships. In J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance3rd ed. pp. 197–218Mountain View, CA:Mayfield Publishing Company.
33.
Le ScanffCTaugisJ (2002). Stress management for police special forces.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology14, 330–343.
34.
LewisBPLinderDE (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23, 937–944.
35.
LiaoC-MMastersRSW (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning.Journal of Sports Sciences19, 307–319.
36.
LiaoC-MMastersRSW (2002). Self-focus attention and performance failure under psychological stress.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology24, 289–305.
37.
MagillRA (1998). Motor learning: Concepts and applications(5th ed.). Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
38.
MartensR (1971). Anxiety and motor behavior: A review.Journal of Motor Behavior2, 151–179.
39.
MartensRVealeyRSBurtonD (1990). Competitive anxiety in sportChampaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
40.
MastersRSW (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure.British Journal of Psychology83, 343–358.
41.
MastersRSW (2000). Theoretical aspects of implicit learning in sport.International Journal of Sport Psychology31, 530–541.
42.
MastersRSWPolmanRCJHammondNV (1993). ‘Reinvestment’: A dimension of personality implicated in skill breakdown under pressure.Personality and Individual Differences14, 655–666.
43.
MaxwellJPMastersRSWEvesFF (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning.Journal of Sports Sciences18, 111–120.
44.
MorrisT (1997). Psychological skills training in sport: An overview(2nd ed.). Leeds, UK:Bases.
45.
MullenRHardyL (2000). State anxiety and motor performance: Testing the conscious processing hypothesis.Journal of Sports Sciences18, 785–799.
46.
MullineauxDRBartlettRMBennettS (2001). Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control.Journal of Sports Sciences19, 739–760.
47.
NewellKM (1981). Skill learning. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human skillspp. 203–226Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
48.
NewellKM (1985). Coordination, control and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and controlpp. 295–317Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers.
49.
NewellKMMcDonaldPV (1992). Searching for solutions to the coordination function: Learning as exploratory behavior. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior IIpp. 517–532North-Holland:Elsevier Science Publishers.
50.
NidefferRM (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34, 394–404.
51.
NidefferRM (1981). The ethics and practice of applied sport psychologyIthaca, NY:Mouvement Publications.
52.
PijpersJROudejansRRDHolsheimerFBakkerFC (2003). Anxiety–performance relationships in climbing: A process-oriented approach.Psychology of Sport and Exercise4, 283–304.
53.
RyanAMPloyhartREGregurasGJSchmitMJ (1998). Test preparation programs in selection contexts: Self-selection and program effectiveness.Personal Psychology51, 599–621.
54.
SchmidtRA (1982). Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasisChampaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
55.
SchwenkmezgerPSteffgenG (1989). Anxiety and motor performance. In B. Kirkcaldy (Ed.), Normalities and abnormalities in human movementpp. 78–99Basel, Switzerland:Karger.
56.
SelyeH (1976). The stress of life(Rev. ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
57.
SkinnerTMcMullenJ (1993). Modern rock climbing: Sport climbing and top roping beyond the basicsMerrillville, IN:ICS Books.
58.
SmithNCBellamyMCollinsDJNewellD (2001). A test of processing efficiency theory in a team sport context.Journal of Sports Sciences19, 321–332.
59.
SmithRESmollFLWiechmanSA (1998). Measurement of trait anxiety in sport. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurementpp. 105–127Morgantown, WV:Fitness Information Technology.
60.
SpielbergerCDGorsuchRLLusheneRE (1970). STAI manual for the State-Trait Anxiety InventoryPalo Alto:Consulting Psychologists Press.
61.
StantonHE (1994). Reduction of performance anxiety in music students.Australian Psychologist29, 124–127.
62.
ThomasJRNelsonJK (1996). Research methods in physical activity(3rd ed.). Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
63.
van der PloegHMDefaresPBSpielbergerCD (1979). Zelfbeoordelingsvragenlijst STAI—versie DY-2[State-Trait Anxiety Inventory—form Y]. Lisse, The Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger.
64.
van der PloegHMDefaresPBSpielbergerCD (1980). Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst ZBV. Een nederlandstalige bewerking van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory[Manual for the Dutch version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. Lisse, The Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger.
65.
van LoonEMMastersRSWRingCMcIntyreDB (2001). Changes in limb stiffness under conditions of mental stress.Journal of Motor Behavior33, 153–164.
66.
VereijkenBvan EmmerikREAWhitingHTANewellKM (1992). Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition.Journal of Motor Behavior24, 133–142.
67.
VereijkenBWhitingHTABeekWJ (1992). A dynamical systems approach to skill acquisition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology45A, 323–344.
68.
VinckenMHDenier van der GonJJ (1985). Stiffness as a control variable in motor performance.Human Movement Science4, 307–319.
69.
Von HofstenC (1990). Development of manipulation action in infancy. In H. Bloch & B. I. Berthenthal (Eds.), Sensory-motor organizations and development in infancy and early childhoodpp. 273–283Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
70.
WannDL (1997). Sport psychologyUpper Saddle River, NY:Prentice Hall.
71.
WeinbergRS (1978). The success and failure on the patterning of neuromuscular energy.Journal of Motor Behavior10, 53–61.
72.
WeinbergRSHuntVV (1976). The interrelationship between anxiety, motor performance and electromyography.Journal of Motor Behavior8, 219–224.
73.
WhitingHTABijlardMJden BrinkerBPLM (1987). The effect of the availability of a dynamic model on the acquisition of a complex cyclical action.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology39A, 43–59.
74.
WilsonGD (2002). Psychology for performing artists(2nd ed.). London:Whurr Publishers.
75.
WineJ (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention.Psychological Bulletin76, 92–104.
76.
WoodmanTHardyL (2001). Stress and anxiety. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology2nd ed., pp. 290–318New York:John Wiley & Sons.
77.
WulfGHößMPrinzW (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention.Journal of Motor Behavior30, 169–179.
78.
WulfGMcNevinNHFuchsTRitterFTooleT (2000). Attentional focus in complex skill learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport71, 229–239.
79.
WulfGPrinzW (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 648–660.
80.
WulfGWeigeltC (1997). Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: To tell or not to tell….Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport68, 362–367.
