Object descriptions are extracted and retained across saccades when observers view natural scenes. We investigated whether particular object properties are encoded and the stability of the resulting memories. We tested immediate recall of multiple types of information from real-world scenes and from computer-presented images of the same scenes. The relationship between fixations and properties of object memory was investigated. Position information was encoded and accumulated from multiple fixations. In contrast, identity and colour were encoded but did not require direct fixation and did not accumulate. In the current experiments, participants were unable to recall any information about shape or relative distances between objects. In addition, where information was encoded we found differential patterns of stability. Data from viewing real scenes and images were highly consistent, with stronger effects in the real-world conditions. Our findings imply that object files are not dependent upon the encoding of any particular object property and so are robust to dynamic visual environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntesJRPenlandJG (1981). Picture context effects on eye movement patterns. D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.) Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception157–170Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2.
BiedermanI (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.) Perceptual organization213–253Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3.
BridgemanBHendryDStarkL (1975). Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.Vision Research15, 6719–722.
4.
BurrDCMorroneMCRossJ (1994). Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye-movements.Nature371, 6497511–513.
5.
Carlson-RadvanskyLAIrwinDE (1995). Memory for structural information across eye-movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 61441–1458.
6.
CurrieCBMcConkieGWCarlson-RadvanskyLAIrwinDE (2000). The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world.Perception & Psychophysics62, 4673–683.
7.
De GraefPChristiaensDd'YdewalleG (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification.Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung52, 4317–329.
8.
De GraefPDetroyAd'YdewalleG (1992). Local and global contextual constraints on the identification of objects in scenes.Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie46, 3489–508.
9.
DeubelHSchneiderWX (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism.Vision Research36, 121812–1837.
10.
DodgeR (1900). Visual perception during eye movement.Psychological Review7, 454–465.
11.
GibsonJJ (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.Boston::Houghton Mifflin.
12.
GrimesJ (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In. K. Atkins (Ed.) Perception: Vancouver studies in cognitive science.2, 89–110New York::Oxford University Press.
13.
HendersonJM (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General123, 4410–426.
14.
HendersonJM (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception.Psychological Science8, 151–55.
15.
HendersonJMHollingworthA (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. G. Underwood (Ed.) Eye guidance in reading and scene perception269–298Oxford, UK::Elsevier.
16.
HendersonJMHollingworthA (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades.Psychological Science10, 5438–443.
17.
HendersonJMPollatsekARaynerK (1989). Covert visual-attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.Perception & Psychophysics45, 3196–208.
18.
HendersonJMSiefertABC (1999). The influence of enantiomorphic transformation on transsaccadic object integration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 1243–255.
19.
HendersonJMWeeksPAHollingworthA (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 1210–228.
20.
HochbergJ (1968). In the mind's eye. R. N. Haber (Ed.) Contemporary theory and research in visual perceptionpp 309–331New York::Holt.
21.
HoffmanJESubramaniamB (1995). The role of visual-attention in saccadic eye-movements.Perception & Psychophysics, 576787–795.
22.
HollingworthAHendersonJM (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28, 1113–136.
23.
HollingworthAWilliamsCCHendersonJM (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 4761–768.
24.
IntraubH (1980). Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory6, 11–12.
25.
IntraubH (1981). Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7, 3604–610.
26.
IrwinDE (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye-movements.Cognitive Psychology23, 3420–456.
27.
IrwinDE (1992a). Memory for position and identity across eye-movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 2307–317.
28.
IrwinDE (1992b). Visual memory within and across fixations. K. Rayner (Ed.) Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading146–165New York:Springer-Verlag.
29.
IrwinDE (1993). Perceiving an integrated visual world. D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neurosciencepp 121–142Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
30.
IrwinDEAndrewsR (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.) Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communicationpp 125–155Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
31.
IrwinDEYantisSJonidesJ (1983). Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye-movements.Perception & Psychophysics34, 149–57.
32.
IrwinDEZelinskyGJ (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed.Perception & Psychophysics64, 6882–895.
33.
JohanssonRSWestlingGRBackstromAFlanaganJR (2001). Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation.Journal of Neuroscience21, 176917–6932.
34.
KahnemanDTreismanA (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of attention29–61New York:Academic Press.
35.
LamareM (1892). Des mouvements des yeux dans la lecture.Bulletin et mémoire de la société française d'ophthalmolo-gie10, 354–364.
36.
LandMF (1993). Eye-head coordination during driving.IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings3, 490–494.
37.
LandMFLeeDN (1994). Where we look when we steer.Nature369, 6483742–744.
38.
LandMFMennieNRustedJ (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living.Perception28, 111311–1328.
39.
LatourP (1962). Visual thresholds during eye movements.Vision Research2, 261–262.
40.
LoftusGR (1972). Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures.Cognitive Psychology3, 525–551.
41.
MarrD (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information.San Francisco::Freeman.
42.
MatinE (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis.Psychological Bulletin81, 899–917.
43.
McConkieGWCurrieCB (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 3563–581.
44.
McConkieGWRaynerK (1976). Identifying the span of the effective stimulus in reading: Literature review and theories of reading. H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.) Theoretical models and processes of readingpp. 137–162Newark, NJ:International Reading Association.
45.
McConkieGWZolaD (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?.Perception and Psychophysics25, 3221–224.
46.
MelcherD (2001). Persistence of visual memory for scenes: A medium–term memory may help us to keep track of objects during visual tasks.Nature412, 6845401.
47.
NelsonWWLoftusGR (1980). The functional visual field during picture viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory6, 3, 91–399.
48.
O'ReganJK (1992). Solving the real mysteries of visual-perception: The world as an outside memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie46, 3461–488.
49.
O'ReganJKDeubelHClarkJJRensinkRA (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking.Visual Cognition7, 1–3191–211.
50.
O'ReganJKLévy-SchoenA (1983). Integrating visual information from successive fixations: Does transsaccadic fusion exist.Vision Research23, 8765–768.
51.
O'ReganJKNoëA (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.Behavioral and Brain Sciences24, 6939–973; discussion 973–1031.
52.
PollatsekARaynerK (1992). What is integrated across fixations?. K. Rayner (Ed.) Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and readingpp 166–191New York::Springer Verlag.
53.
RaynerK (1978). Foveal and parafoveal cues in reading. J. Requin (Ed.) Attention and performance7, pp 149–162Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
54.
RaynerK (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin124, 3372–422.
55.
RaynerKMcConkieGWZolaD (1980). Integrating information across eye movements.Cognitive Psychology12, 206–226.
56.
RaynerKPollatsekA (1983). Is visual information integrated across saccades.Perception & Psychophysics34, 139–48.
57.
RaynerKPollatsekA (1992). Eye-movements and scene perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie46, 3342–376.
58.
RensinkRA (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes.Visual Cognition7, 1–317–42.
59.
RensinkRA (2000b). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing.Vision Research40, 10–121469–1487.
60.
RensinkRAO'ReganJKClarkJJ (1995). Image flicker is as good as saccades in making large scene changes invisible.Perception24, Suppl26–27.
61.
RensinkRAO'ReganJKClarkJJ (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science8, 5368–373.
62.
RensinkRAO'ReganJKClarkJJ (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions.Visual Cognition7, 1–3127–145.
63.
ShepherdMFindlayJMHockeyRJ (1986). The relationship between eye-movements and spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology38A, 475–491.
64.
SimonsDJ (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail.Psychological Science7, 5301–305.
65.
TatlerBWGilchristIDRustedJ (2003). The time course of abstract visual representation.Perception32, 5579–592.
66.
TatlerBWWadeNJ (2003). On nystagmus, saccades and fixations.Perception32, 2167–184.
67.
WadeNJTatlerBWHellerD (2003). Dodgeing the issue: Dodge, Javal, Hering and the measurement of saccades in eye movement research.Perception32, 7793–804.
