By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names

Abstract

The nominal competitor effect suggests that, when a person has two names associated with them, recall of either name is more difficult than if they just had one name. Drawing on a connectionist framework, this effect could arise either if multiple names were represented as being connected to a single person identity node (PIN), or if multiple names were represented as being connected via one-to-one links to multiple PINs. Whilst the latter has intuitive appeal, results from two experiments support the former architecture. Having two names connected to a single PIN not only gives rise to a nominal competitor effect (Experiment 1), but also gives rise to a familiarity enhancement effect (Experiment 2). These empirical results are simulated using an extension of Brédart, Valentine, Calder, and Gassi's (1995) connectionist architecture, which reveals that both effects hold even when the association of both names to the PIN is unequal. These results are presented in terms of a more complete model for person recognition, and the representation of semantic information within such a model is examined.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brédart

(1993). Retrieval failures in face naming. Memory 1, 4 351–366.

Brédart

Valentine

Calder

Gassi

(1995). An interactive activation model of face naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A, 2 466–486.

Burton

Bruce

(1992). I recognise your face but I can't remember your name: A simple explanation?. British Journal of Psychology 83, 45–60.

Burton

Bruce

(1993). Naming faces and naming names: Exploring an interactive activation model of person recognition. Memory 1, 457–480.

Burton

Bruce

Johnston

(1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology 81, 361–380.

Hanley

(1995). Are names difficult to recall because they are unique? A case-study of a patient with anomia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A, 487–506.

Hanley

Cowell

(1988). The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces. Memory & Cognition 16, 545–555.

Harris

Kay

(1995). I recognize your face but I can't remember your name: Is it because names are unique?. British Journal of Psychology 86, 345–358.

Levelt

WJM

(1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Lewis

Anderson

(1976). Interference with real world knowledge. Cognitive Psychology 8, 311–335.

11.

McClelland

(1981). Retrieving general and specific information from stored knowledge of specifics. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 170–172).

12.

Semenza

Zettin

(1988). Generating proper names: A case of selective inability. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5, 711–721.

13.

Sergent

(1986). Microgenesis of face perception. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. W. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 17–33)

Dordrecht, Netherlands:

Nijhoff.

14.

Valentine

Hollis

Moore

(1999). The nominal competitor effect: When one name is better than two. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 749–754)

Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

15.

Yarmey

(1973). I recognise your face but I can't remember your name: Further evidence on the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition 1, 287–290.

16.

Young

Ellis

Flude

(1988). Accessing stored information about familiar people. Psychological Research 50, 111–115.

17.

Young

Hay

Ellis

(1985). The faces that launched a thousand slips: Everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. British Journal of Psychology 76, 495–523.

18.

Young

McWeeny

Ellis

Hay

(1986). Naming and categorizing faces and written names. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 38A, 297–318.