This article argues for a specifically female appropriation and reshaping of the epic tradition in the wake of Darwin's On the Origin of Species. Based on an analysis of Mathilde Blind's The Ascent of Man and Louisa Sarah Bevington's ‘Unto this Present’, it will show how this ‘female evolutionary epic’ responds to and counteracts Social Darwinist narratives of competition and struggle by emphasizing forces of (maternal) gestation, co-operation and sympathy in the development of life on earth. In doing so, these poems anticipate Peter Kropotkin's notion of ‘mutual aid’ as the primary factor in evolution.
AmigoniDavid, and ElwickJames, eds. 2011. Victorian Science and Literature: The Evolutionary Epic . London: Pickering & Chatto.
2.
ArmstrongIsobel.1993. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics . London: Routledge.
3.
ArmstrongIsobel, and BristowJoseph. 1998. “
Introduction. ” In Nineteenth-Century Women Poets: An Oxford Anthology , edited by ArmstrongIsobel, and BristowJoseph, xxiii–xli.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AverySimon.2000. “
‘Tantalising Glimpses’: The Intersecting Lives of Eleanor Marx and Mathilde Blind. ” In Eleanor Marx (1855-1898): Life, Work, Contacts , edited by StokesJohn, 173–187.
Aldershot: Ashgate.
5.
BevingtonLouisa Sarah.1879. Key-Notes . London: Kegan Paul & Co.
BirchKaty.2013. “‘Carrying Her Coyness to a Dangerous Pitch'’: Mathilde Blind and the Darwinian Sexual Selection. ” Women: A Cultural Review 24 (1): 71–89. doi: 10.1080/09574042.2012.751166.
8.
BlindMathilde.1886. Shelley's View of Nature Contrasted with Darwin's . London: Richard Clay and Sons.
9.
BlindMathilde.1889. The Ascent of Man . London: Chatto & Windus.
10.
BowlerPeter J.1976. Fossils and Progress: Paleontology and the Idea of Progressive Evolution in the Nineteenth Century . New York: Science History Publications.
11.
BrownSusan.2003. “
‘A Still and Mute-Born Vision’: Locating Mathilde Blind's Reproductive Poetics. ” In Victorian Women Poets , edited by ChapmanAlison, 123–144.
Cambridge: Brewer.
12.
CahmCaroline.1989. Kropotkin and the Rise of Revolutionary Anarchism 1872-1886 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DentithSimon.2006. Epic and Empire in Nineteenth-Century Britain , 27–31.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DeutscherPenelope.2004. “The Descent of Man and the Evolution of Woman. ” Hypatia 19 (2): 35–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01287.x
15.
DiedrickJames.2016. Mathilde Blind: Late-Victorian Culture and the Woman of Letters . Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
16.
DominguesJackie Dees.2000. “
Louisa Sarah Bevington. ” In Nineteenth-Century British Women Writers: A Bio-Bibliographical Source Book , edited by BloomAbigail Burnham, 27–31.
Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
17.
DownesJeremy M.1997. Recursive Desire: Rereading Epic Tradition . Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
18.
EddyBeth.2010. “Struggle or Mutual Aid: Jane Addams, Petr Kropotkin, and the Progressive Encounter with Social Darwinism. ” The Pluralist 5 (1): 21–43. doi: 10.5406/pluralist.5.1.0021
19.
“epic, n. and adj.”. OED Online. 2022 December. Oxford University Press. (Accessed December 13, 2022).
20.
FerrettiFederico.2019. Anarchy and Geography: Reclus and Kropotkin in the UK . London: Routledge.
21.
FunkWolfgang.2017. “‘Happy Amicable Co-Operation’: Mutual Aid, Anarchism and the Image of the Bee in the Work of Louisa Sarah Bevington. ” European Journal of English Studies 21 (1): 61–75. doi: 10.1080/13825577.2016.1274539
22.
GambleEliza Burt.1894. The Evolution of Woman: An Inquiry Into the Dogma of Her Inferiority to Man . New York: Putnam's Sons.
23.
GeddesPatrick, and Arthur ThomsonJ.. 1889. 1908. The Evolution of Sex. 1889 . London: Walter Scott.
24.
GirónÁlvaro.2003. “Kropotkin Between Lamarck and Darwin: The Impossible Synthesis. ” Asclepio; Archivo Iberoamericano De Historia De La Medicina Y Antropologia Medica 55 (1): 189–214. doi: 10.3989/asclepio.2003.v55.i1.94
25.
GrahamColin.1998. Ideologies of Epic: Nation, Empire and Victorian Epic Poetry . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26.
GrothHelen.1999. “
Victorian Women Poets and Scientific Narratives. ” In Women's Poetry, Late Romantic to Late Victorian , edited by ArmstrongIsobel, and BlainVirginia, 325–351.
Houndmills: Palgrave.
27.
HamlinKimberley A.2014. From Eve to Evolution: Darwin, Science, and Women's Rights in Gilded Age America . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
HawkinsMike.1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860-1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HolmesJohn.2009. Darwin's Bards: British and American Poetry in the Age of Evolution . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
30.
Hotz-DaviesIngrid.2001. The Creation of Religious Identities by English Women Poets from the Seventeenth to the Early Twentieth Century: Soulscapes . Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
31.
HrdySarah Blaffer.1981. The Woman That Never Evolved . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
HughesLinda K.2010. The Cambridge Introduction to Victorian Poetry . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HuxleyThomas H. (1888) 1895. “
The Struggle for Existence in Human Society. ” Ch. 5 In Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays . London: Macmillan.
34.
KinnaRuth.1995. “Kropotkin's Theory of Mutual Aid in Historical Context. ” International Review of Social History 40 (2): 259–283. doi: 10.1017/S0020859000113227
35.
KropotkinPeter.1902. 1989. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution . Montrèal: Black Rose Books.
36.
LaPorteCharles.2006. “Atheist Prophecy: Mathilde Blind, Constance Naden, and the Victorian Poetess. ” Victorian Literature and Culture 34: 427–441. doi: 10.1017/S1060150306051254
37.
LightmanBernard.2009. Victorian Popularisers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
O'ConnorRalph.2009. “From the Epic of Earth History to the Evolutionary Epic in Nineteenth-Century Britain. ” Journal of Victorian Culture 14 (2): 207–223. doi: 10.3366/E1355550209000794
39.
QuintusJohn Allen.2012. “Louisa Sarah Bevington's Letters to Ethel Rolt Wheeler: A Catechism in Communist Anarchy. ” Anarchist Studies 20 (1): 80–88.
40.
RichardsonAngelique.2003. Love and Eugenics in the Late Nineteenth Century: Rational Reproduction and the New Woman . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
RudwickMartin J.S.2005. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
RudyJason R.2006. “Rapturous Forms: Mathilde Blind's Darwinian Poetics. ” Victorian Literature and Culture 34: 443–459. doi: 10.1017/S1060150306051266
43.
Shpayer-MakovHaia.1987. “The Reception of Peter Kropotkin in Britain, 1886-1917. ” Albion 19 (3): 373–390. doi: 10.2307/4050466
44.
SpencerHerbert.1864. The Principles of Biology . London: Williams and Norgate.
45.
SpencerHerbert.1874. “Psychology of the Sexes. ” The Popular Science Monthly 4: 30–38.
46.
TateGregory.2017. “Poetry and Science.” In The Routledge Research Companion to Nineteenth-Century British Literature and Science , edited by John Holmes and Sharon Ruston, 101–114.
London: Routledge.
