We submit our recent systemic democratic peace research to the control variable doctrine of James Lee Ray, as codified in his 2003 treatise. In particular, we seek to determine whether international institutions intervene in the relationship between the democratic community's strength and the use and effectiveness of third party conflict management, whether hegemony is a competing explanation of third party settlement, and whether our extant model is robust when several control variables are specified. Two important conclusions are reached: (1) the democratic community's strength and institutional vitality promote third party mediation and its success, regardless of hegemonic might and other controls; and 2) Ray's teaching is properly understood as an exhortation for scholars to more carefully consider the theoretical role of each control variable and its proper treatment in statistical models, not as an edict banning the use of control variables.
Achen, C.H.2002. Towards a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science5: 423-450.
2.
Achen, C.H.2005. Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science22: this issue.
3.
Blalock, H.M. Jr.1964. Causal inference in non-experimental research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press .
4.
Clarke, K.A.2005. The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science22: this issue.
5.
Crescenzi, M.J.C., and A.J. Enterline.1999. Ripples from the waves? A systemic, time-series analysis of democracy, democratization, and interstate war. Journal of Peace Research36: 75-94.
6.
Crescenzi, M.J.C., and K.M. Kadera.2004. Autocratic Failure, Democratic Community, and War. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association in Chicago, Illinois , September 2-5.
7.
Fortna, V.P.2004. Peace time: Cease-fire agreements and the durability of peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Gates, S., T.L. Knutsen, and J.W. Moses.1996. Democracy and peace: A more skeptical view. Journal of Peace Research33: 1-10.
9.
Gleditsch, N.P., and H. Hegre.1997. Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution41: 283-310.
10.
Hensel, P.R.2001. Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly45: 81-109.
11.
Hensel, P.R., S. McLaughlin Mitchell, and T.E. Sowers II.2004. Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues in the WesternHemisphere. Working paper available at www.icow.org.
12.
Ho, D.E., K. Imai, G. King, and E.A. Stuart.2004. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Working paper, available at http://gking.harvard.edu/files/matchp.pdf .
13.
Ikenberry, G.J.2001. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
14.
James, P., E. Solberg, and M. Wolfson.1999. An identified systemic model of the democracy-peace nexus. Defence and Peace Economics10: 1-37.
15.
Kadera, K.M., M.J.C. Crescenzi, and M.L. Shannon.2003. Democratic survival, peace, and war in the international system. American Journal of Political Science47: 234-247.
16.
King, G., R.O. Keohane, and S. Verba.1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Leamer, E.E.1983. Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review73: 31-43.
18.
Leamer, E.E., and H.B. Leonard.1983. Reporting the fragility of regression estimates. Review of Economics and Statistics65: 306-317.
19.
Levine, R., and D. Renelt.1992. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review82: 942-963.
20.
Maoz, Z.1996. Domestic sources of global change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Marshall, M.G., and K. Jaggers.2000. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-1899. Dataset Users Manual. Available at http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity.
22.
Mitchell, S.M.2002. A Kantian system? Democracy and third-party conflict resolution . American Journal of Political Science46: 749-759.
23.
Mitchell, S.M., S. Gates, and H. Hegre.1999. Evolution in democracy-war dynamics . Journal of Conflict Resolution43: 771-792.
24.
Mitchell, S.M., K.M. Kadera, and M.J.C. Crescenzi .2005. Practicing democratic community norms: Third party conflict management and success. Working paper available at http://saramitchell.org.
25.
Oneal, J.M., and B. Russett.2005. Rule of three, let it be? When more really is better. Conflict Management and Peace Science22: this issue.
26.
Oneal, J.M., and B. Russett.1999. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885-1992 . World Politics52: 1-37.
27.
Pagan. A. R.1990. Three Econometric Methodologies: A Critical Appraisal . In Modeling Economic Series, ed. C. W. J. Granger.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 97-120.
28.
Pevehouse, J.2002a. Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization. International Organization56: 515-549.
29.
Pevehouse, J.2002b. With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science46: 611-626.
30.
Rasler, K., and W. Thompson.2004. The democratic peace and a sequential, reciprocal, causal arrow hypothesis. Comparative Political Studies37: 879-908.
31.
Ray, J.L.2003. Explaining interstate conflict and war: What should we control for? Conflict Management and Peace Science20: 1-31.
32.
Ray, J.L.2005. Constructing multivariate analyses (of dangerous dyads) . Conflict Management and Peace Science22: this issue.
33.
Russett, B., and J.M. Oneal.2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.
34.
Sala-I-Martin, X.X.1997. I just ran two million regressions. American Economic Review87: 178-183.
35.
Shannon, M.2005. The democratic community and the expansion of international organizations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa, Ames.
36.
Singer, J.D., S. Bremer, and J. Stuckey.1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers , ed. B. Russett.Beverly Hills: Stage, 19-48.
37.
Starr, H.1992. Why don't democracies fight one another-Evaluating the theory-findings feedback loop. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations14: 41-59.
38.
Starr, H., 2005. Cumulation from proper specification: Theory, logic, research design, and nice laws. Conflict Management and Peace Science22: this issue.
39.
Thompson, W.1996. Democracy and peace: Putting the cart before the horse ? International Organization50: 141-174.
40.
Walter, B.2001. Committing to peace: The successful settlement of civil wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Zinnes, D.1980. Three puzzles in search of a researcher: Presidential address. International Studies Quarterly24: 315-342.
