Can Assessment Reactivity Predict Treatment Outcome among Adolescents with Alcohol and Other Substance Use Disorders?

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are two-fold: to examine first, if the change from positive to negative alcohol and any other substance use status from baseline assessment to the onset of the first session (i.e., pre-treatment phase) occurs in adolescents, that is, Assessment Reactivity (AR); second, whether AR predicts treatment outcome. Participants were 177 adolescents with alcohol and other substance use disorders (AOSUD) in a 9-weekly group sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. Drug urinalysis results at baseline assessment, first and last session and self-report for alcohol use were used as outcome measures. Participants showed a highly significant shift to non-use of both alcohol and of other substances from intake assessment to first session and from first to last session. Alcohol and substance use at first session predicted use at last session. This is the first study in youth asserting Assessment Reactivity as a valid construct during the pretreat-ment phase. AR should be considered in any analysis targeting treatment outcomes.

Keywords

Adolescent alcohol use disorder substance use disorder treatment outcome assessment reactivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Office of Applied Studies. 2005. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2002. Discharges from substance abuse treatment services, Rockville, MD: SAMHSA.

Dennis

M L

and Kaminer

. 2006. Introduction to special issue on advances in the assessment and treatment of adolescent substance use disorders. Am J Addict, 15(suppl 1): 1–3.

Miller

W R

and Sanchez

. 1994. Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change, Edited by: Howard

and Nathan

51–81. IN University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults

Epstein

E E

, Drapkin

M L

, Yusko

D A

, Cook

S M

, McCrady

B S

and Jensen

N K

. 2005. Is alcohol assessment therapeutic? Pretreatment change in drinking among alcohol-dependent women?. J Stud Alcohol, 66: 369–378.

Clifford

P R

and Maisto

S A

. 2000. Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol, 61: 787–793.

Project MAT CH Research Group. 1998. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol, 59: 631–639.

Chung

and Maisto

S A

. 2006. Relapse to alcohol and other drug use in treated adolescents: Review and reconsideration of relapse as a change point in clinical course. Clin Psychol Review, 26: 149–161.

Battjes

R J

, Gordon

M S

, O'Grady

K E

, Kinlock

T W

and Carswell

M A

. 2003. Factors that predict adolescent moti-1, vation for substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat, 24: 221–232.

Hser

Y I

, Grella

C E

, Hubbard

R L

, Hsieh

S C

, Fletcher

B W

and Brown

B S

. 2001. An evaluation of drug treatments for adolescents in 4 cities. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 58: 689–695.

10.

Winters

K C

, Stinchfield

R D

, Opland

, Weller

and Latimer

W W

. 2001. The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. Addiction, 95: 601–612.

11.

Sobell

L C

, Agrawla

, Sobell

M B

, Leo

G I

, Cunningham

J A

and Young

L J

. 2003. Responding to an advertisement: A critical event in promoting self-change of drinking behavior. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy. 2003.