Predictors of Substance Abuse Treatment Entry among Rural Illicit Stimulant Users in Ohio,Arkansas,and Kentucky

Abstract

Illicit drug use in the rural United States is increasingly common, yet little is known about drug users’ treatment-seeking behaviors. This study identifies predictors of substance abuse treatment entry over 24 months among 710 illicit stimulant users in rural areas of Ohio, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Active users of powdered cocaine, crack cocaine, and/or methamphetamine (MA) were recruited using respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed structured interviews at baseline and follow-up questionnaires every 6 months for 24 months. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The paper is informed by the Anderson-Newman Model. Overall, 18.7% of the sample entered treatment. Ohio or Kentucky residence, perceived need for substance abuse treatment, higher Addiction Severity Index (ASI) legal problem composite scores, prior substance abuse treatment, and tranquilizer use were positively associated with treatment entry. Nondaily crack cocaine users and marijuana users were less likely to enter treatment. The findings can help inform rural substance abuse treatment program development and outreach.

Keywords

Cocaine crack drug abuse treatment methamphetamine rural substance abuse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sexton

R L

, Carlson

R G

, Leukefeld

C G

and Booth

B M

. 2006. Methamphetamine use and adverse consequences in the rural southern United States: an ethnographic overview. J Psychoactive Drugs SARC Suppl., 3: 393–404.

Booth

B M

, Kirchner

, Fortney

, Ross

and Rost

. 2000. Rural at-risk drinkers: correlates and one-year use of alcoholism treatment services. J Stud Alcohol., 61: 267–277.

Weisner

and Matzger

. 2002. A prospective study of the factors influencing entry to alcohol and drug treatment. J Behav Health Ser Res., 29: 126–137.

Hser

, Maglione

, Polinsky

and Anglin

M D

. 1998. Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. J Subst Abuse Treat., 15: 213–220.

Siegal

H A

, Falck

R S

, Wang

and Carlson

R G

. 2002. Predictors of drug abuse treatment entry among crack-cocaine smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend., 68: 159–166.

Heckathorn

. 1997. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Probl., 44: 174–199.

Heckathorn

. 2002. Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral sampling of hidden populations. Social Probl., 49: 11–34.

Andersen

R M

. 1995. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. J Health Soc Behav., 36: 1–10.

Ware

J E

, Kosinski

, Dewey

J E

and Gandek

. 2001. How to Score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey, Lincoln, NE: QualityMetric.

10.

McLellan

A T

, Kushner

, Metzger

, Peters

, Smith

, Grissom

, Pettinati

and Argeriou

. 1992. The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat., 9: 199–213.

11.

Allison

P D

. 1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Sage University Papers, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-046

12.

Allison

P D

. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

13.

SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8, vol. 3, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

14.

Adair

E BG

, Craddock

S G

, Miller

H G

and Turner

C F

. 1995. Assessing consistency of responses to questions on cocaine use. Addiction, 90: 1497–1502.

15.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Treatment Facility http://www.findtreatment.samhsa.gov

16.

Derived from: Office of National Drug Control Policy. 2006. Inventory of State Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Activities and Expenditures, Washingon, DC: Executive Office of the President. Publication No. NCJ 216918

17.

Sexton

R L

, Carlson

, Leukefeld

and Booth

. 2008. Barriers to drug abuse treatment in the rural South: Preliminary findings from Arkansas and Kentucky. J Psychoactive Drugs., 40: 1–29.

18.

McAuliffe

and Dunn

. 2004. Substance abuse treatment needs and access in the USA: interstate variations. Addiction, 99: 999–1014. 2004

19.

Rowland

and Lyons

. 1989. Triple jeopardy: rural poor and uninsured. Health Serv Res, 23: 975–1004.

20.

Quintero

, Peterson

and Young

. 2006. An exploratory study of socio-cultural factors contributing to prescription rug misuse among college students. J Drug Issues, 36: 903–932.

21.

Zule

W A

and Desmond

D P

. 2000. Factors predicting entry of injecting drug users into substance abuse treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 26: 247–261.

22.

Appel

P W

, Ellison

A A

, Jansky

H K

and Oldak

. 2004. Barriers to enrollment in drug abuse treatment and suggestions for reducing them: opinions of drug injecting street outreach clients and other system stakeholders. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse, 30: 129–153.

23.

Falck

R S

, Wang

, Carlson

R G

, Krishnan

L L

, Leukefeld

and Booth

B M

. 2007. Perceived need for substance abuse treatment among illicit stimulant drug users in rural areas of Ohio Arkansas and Kentucky. Drug Alcohol Depend, 91: 107–114.

24.

Pringle

J L

, Emptage

N P

and Hubbard

R L

. 2006. Unmet needs for comprehensive services in outpatient addiction treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat, 3: 183–189.