Background: This study investigates whether residential exposure to tobacco outlets (i.e., convenience stores and other stores selling tobacco) is associated with attitudes towards smoking among a sample of urban, primarily African American, adolescent smokers. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data for 197 adolescents were integrated with spatial data on tobacco outlets via subject home addresses. Ordinal regression was employed to test hypotheses that closer proximity to, and higher concentrations of, tobacco outlets are associated with higher measures of intention to continue to smoke in the future, weaker self-efficacy related to stopping smoking, and more accepting social norms related to smoking, while controlling for characteristics of age, gender, family and peer smoking contexts, and level of nicotine dependence. Moderation by age and gender was also investigated. Results: Higher residential tobacco outlet density is significantly associated with a greater intention to smoke in the next 3 months, a lower readiness to stop smoking, and a greater likelihood of accepting a cigarette from a friend. Residential proximity to a tobacco outlet is significantly associated with a greater intention to smoke 5 years on. Evidence of a relationship between exposure to tobacco outlets and social norms related to smoking was not found, nor was there evidence for moderation of these relationships by age or gender. Conclusions: These results suggest that among urban adolescents who currently smoke, higher residential exposure to tobacco outlets is associated with greater predisposition towards future smoking and lower self-evaluation of the ability to stop smoking.
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General.Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General.Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.
3.
RobertsonL, McGeeR, MarshL, HoekJ. A systematic review on the impact of point-of-sale tobacco promotion on smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17:2–17.
4.
CantrellJ, PearsonJL, Ansesetti-RothermelA, XialH, KirchnerTR, ValloneD. Tobacco retail outlet density and young adult tobacco initiation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18:130–137.
5.
AdamsML, JasonLA, PokornyS, HuntY. Exploration of the link between tobacco retailers in school neighborhoods and student smoking. J Sch Health. 2013;83:112–118.
6.
HenriksenL, FeigheryEC, SchleicherNC, CowlingDW, KlineRS, FortmannSP. Is adolescent smoking related to the density and proximity of tobacco outlets and retail cigarette advertising near schools?Prev Med. 2008;47:210–214.
7.
JohnsM, SacksR, RangeM, KansagraSM. Exposure to tobacco retail outlets and smoking initiation among New York City adolescents. J Urban Health. 2013;90:1091–1101.
8.
McCarthyWJ, MistryR, LuY, PatelM, ZhengH, DietschB. Density of tobacco retailers near schools: effects on tobacco use among students. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2006–2013.
9.
Lipperman-KredaS, GrubeJW, FriendKB. Local tobacco policy and tobacco outlet density: associations with youth smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50:547–552.
10.
NovakSP, ReardonSF, RaudenbushSW, BukaSL. Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:670–676.
11.
LoomisBR, KimAE, BuseyAH, FarrellyMC, WillettJG, JusterHR. The density of tobacco retailers and its association with attitudes toward smoking, exposure to point-of-sale tobacco advertising, cigarette purchasing, and smoking among New York youth. Prev Med. 2012;55:468–474.
12.
NormanP, ConnerM, BellR. The theory of planned behavior and smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1999;18:89–94.
13.
WakefieldM, KloskaDD, O'MalleyPM, . The role of smoking intentions in predicting future smoking among youth: findings from Monitoring the Future data. Addiction. 2004;99:914–922.
14.
BranstetterSA, BlosnichJ, DinaG, NolanJ, HornK. Gender differences in cigarette smoking, social correlates and cessation among adolescents. Addict Behav. 2012;37:739–742.
15.
SuX, LiL, GriffithsSM, GeoY, LauJTF, MoPKH. Smoking behaviors and intentions among adolescents in rural China: the application of theory of planned behavior and the role of social influence. Addict Behav. 2015;48:44–51.
16.
ChoiWS, GilpinEA, FarkasAJ, PierceJP. Determining the probability of future smoking among adolescents. Addiction. 2001;96:313–323.
17.
FrickRG, KleinEG, FerketichAK, WewersME. Tobacco advertising and sales practices in licensed retail outlets after the Food and Drug Administration regulations. J Commun Health. 2012;37:963–967.
18.
PollayRW.More than meets the eye: on the importance of retail cigarette merchandising. Tob Control. 2007;16:270–274.
19.
SlaterSJ, ChaloupkaFJ, WakefieldM, JohnstonLD, O'MalleyPM. The impact of retail cigarette marketing practices on youth smoking uptake. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:440–445.
20.
WakefieldM, GermainD, HenriksenL. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase. Addiction. 2008;103:322–328.
21.
PaynterJ, EdwardsR. The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:25–35.
22.
WakefieldM, GermainD, DurkinS, HenriksenL. An experimental study of effects on schoolchildren of exposure to point-of-sale cigarette advertising and pack displays. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:338–347.
23.
WatkinsKL, ReganSD, NguyenN, . Advancing cessation research by integrating EMA and geospatial methodologies: associations between tobacco retail outlets and real-time smoking urges during a quit attempt. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(Suppl 2):S93–S101.
24.
MasonMJ, CampbellL, WayT, . Development and outcomes of a text messaging tobacco cessation intervention with urban adolescents. Subst Abus. 2015;36:500–506.
25.
FagerstromKO.Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav. 1978;3:235–241.
26.
HanT, AlexanderM, NiggebruggeA, HollandsGJ, MarteauTM. Impact of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation: a longitudinal observational study in two English cities. Health Place. 2014;27:45–50.
27.
JohnstonLD, O'MalleyPM, BachmanJG, SchulenbergJE. Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2011.
28.
Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA). Readiness Ruler. Albuquerque, NH: CASAA; 1995.
GilmanSE, RendeR, BoergersJ, . Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: an intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e274–e281.
31.
ValenteTW, UngerJB, JohnsonCA. Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:323–329.
32.
MennisJ, MasonMJ. Social and geographic contexts of adolescent substance use: the moderating effects of age and gender. Soc Netw. 2012;34:150–157.
33.
ReitzelLR, CromleyEK, LiY, . The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:315–320.
34.
WatkinsKL, ReganSD, NguyenN, . Advancing cessation research by integrating EMA and geospatial methodologies: associations between tobacco retail outlets and real-time smoking urges during a quit attempt. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16:S93–S101.
35.
HenriksenL, FloraJA, FeigheryE, FortmannSP. Effects on youth exposure to retail tobacco advertising. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:1771–1789.
36.
MennisJ, MasonMJ. People, places, and adolescent substance use: integrating activity space and social network data for analyzing health behavior. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2011;101:272–291.
